• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24

In this piece of coursework, I will use three different methods (Change of Sign, Newton-Raphson, and the Rearrangement Method) to find the roots of a series of different equations. The number of roots found differs from method to method.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Colin Tebbett

Pure Mathematics 2: Coursework Assessment

In this piece of coursework, I will use three different methods (Change of Sign, Newton-Raphson, and the Rearrangement Method) to find the roots of a series of different equations.  The number of roots found differs from method to method.  A comparison of the three methods will be made at the end of the report.

Change of Sign Method

Equation:        x3 + x2 - 2x + 3 = 0

Using the above equation, the function f(x) = x3 + x2 - 2x + 3 may be generated.

This may be expressed in graphical form (see page 2)

This may be solved using the method of Interval Bisection (see page 3)

image00.jpg

<--------Interval------->

Mid Point

Height at A

Height at B

Height at M

Curve

a

b

Mid Point

f(a)

f(b)

f(m)

y=x^3+x^2-2*x+3

-3

-2

-2.5

-9

3

-1.375

-2.5

-2

-2.25

-1.375

3

1.171875

-2.5

-2.25

-2.375

-1.375

1.171875

-0.005859375

-2.375

-2.25

-2.3125

-0.005859375

1.171875

0.606201172

-2.375

-2.3125

-2.34375

-0.005859375

0.606201172

0.306060791

-2.375

-2.34375

-2.359375

-0.005859375

0.306060791

0.151584625

-2.375

-2.359375

-2.3671875

-0.005859375

0.151584625

0.073235035

-2.375

-2.3671875

-2.37109375

-0.005859375

0.073235035

0.033781111

-2.375

-2.37109375

-2.373046875

-0.005859375

0.033781111

0.013984211

-2.375

-2.373046875

-2.374023438

-0.005859375

0.013984211

0.004068256

-2.375

-2.374023438

-2.374511719

-0.005859375

0.004068256

-8.94099E-04

-2.374511719

-2.374023438

-2.374267578

-8.94099E-04

0.004068256

0.001587443

-2.374511719

-2.374267578

-2.374389648

-8.94099E-04

0.001587443

3.46763E-04

The root 'x' can be seen to be in between

-2.374511719

and

-2.374267578

ie.

-2.374511719

<    x    <

-2.374267578

An estimate for the root is x=

-2.374389648

±

1.22070E-04

or

-2.3744

(correct to 4 decimal places)

The Change of Sign Method can, however, fail when certain equations must be solved.

...read more.

Middle

2.409090909

2.936232156

12.41115702

2.172510859

X3

2.172510859

0.39126991

9.159410291

2.129793053

X4

2.129793053

0.011815313

8.608055342

2.128420465

X5

2.128420465

1.20350E-05

8.590521025

2.128419064

X6

2.128419064

1.25322E-11

8.590503134

2.128419064

X7

2.128419064

-1.77636E-15

8.590503134

2.128419064

An estimate for root 'c' is

2.128419064

or

2.12842

(correct to 5 decimal places)

Error bounds for ‘c’

The value found in the spreadsheet above for root ‘c’ is 2.12842 (5 d.p.)

Because this value is to 5 decimal places, the error boundaries are as follows:

2.128415        <        c        <        2.128425

We can check that this is correct using the Change of Sign Method (Interval Bisection) as described above (see page 11).

<--------Interval------->

Mid Point

Height at A

Height at B

Height at M

Curve

a

b

Mid Point

f(a)

f(b)

f(m)

y=x^3-5*x+1

2

3

2.5

-1

13

4.125

2

2.5

2.25

-1

4.125

1.140625

2

2.25

2.125

-1

1.140625

-0.029296875

2.125

2.25

2.1875

-0.029296875

1.140625

0.530029297

2.125

2.1875

2.15625

-0.029296875

0.530029297

0.244049072

2.125

2.15625

2.140625

-0.029296875

0.244049072

0.105808258

2.125

2.140625

2.1328125

-0.029296875

0.105808258

0.037865162

2.125

2.1328125

2.12890625

-0.029296875

0.037865162

0.00418669

2.125

2.12890625

2.126953125

-0.029296875

0.00418669

-0.012579434

2.126953125

2.12890625

2.127929688

-0.012579434

0.00418669

-0.00420246

2.127929688

2.12890625

2.128417969

-0.00420246

0.00418669

-9.40741E-06

2.128417969

2.12890625

2.128662109

-9.40741E-06

0.00418669

0.002088261

2.128417969

2.128662109

2.128540039

-9.40741E-06

0.002088261

0.001039331

The root 'x' can be seen to be in between

2.128417969

and

2.128662109

ie.

2.128417969

<    x    <

2.128662109

An estimate for the root is x=

2.128540039

±

1.22070E-04

or

2.12854

(correct to 5 decimal places)

The Newton-Raphson Method can, however, fail when certain equations must be solved.  Below is an example:

Equation:        5 – 1/((x – 1)2 + 0.2)) = 0

Function:        f(x) = 5 - 1/((x – 1)2 + 0.2))

This cannot be solved using the Newton-Raphson Method because the gradient of the tangent at the starting point is very shallow.  Therefore the method makes the tangent diverge away from the root.

The function expressed in graphical form is shown on page 13.

An attempt to solve the equation using the Newton-Raphson Method is shown below:

If y = 5 – 1/((x – 1)2 + 0.2))

Then dy/dx = (50 * (x - 1)) / (5x2 – 10x + 6)2

Estimates:

...read more.

Conclusion

The Newton-Raphson method, however, took 30 steps and still was not fully finished.  This is time-consuming and unnecessary.

The Rearrangement Method took 10 steps in order to prove success or express failure.  It also involved the use of manual calculations, which are relatively slow when compared to the use of a spreadsheet.

Thus, the Change of Sign method was the easiest and quickest method to use.

The Hardware available plays a large part in the ease of each method.  A computer helps greatly, as complex and repetitive calculations can be done easily.  This is helpful in all three methods, as may be seen above.

Graphical calculators can also make the methods easier to complete.  Methods that are graph-intensive, such as the Rearrangement Method, can either be completed or checked using a graphical calculator.

Other Hardware can also be used, however, these are generally large, specialised machines that are specifically designed to find the root to complex equations.

The Software available also can make different methods a lot easier.  Spreadsheets (using Microsoft Excel) and Graphs (predominantly drawn using Autograph) can be incorporated into text documents (Microsoft Word) quickly and clearly, and thus reference can be made to them throughout a report.  Difficult equations (such as that used in Rearrangement 2 in the Rearrangement Method) can be differentiated using Derive, which is helpful as it saves time and prevents mistakes.  Therefore, the software available plays a large part in the ease of which each method can be completed.

        -  -

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    E.g. if the root is between 1 and 2, then you draw a tangent at x= 1 point on the graph. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent.

  2. Methods of Advanced Mathematics (C3) Coursework.

    than one or less than one then the route would fail as I have already mentioned. If I were to rearrange the equation into the form of y=(x^5+4)/2 to try and find the same route the iterations seem to diverge to other routes because of the constants of the method I have mentioned above.

  1. Numerical Methods Coursework

    This assumption was made according to the theory above. The table below gives an example to justify the allegation. M 0.789805463368892 Differences Ratio of M 0.782352643183880 0.007452820185012 Differences M 0.780527752410573 0.001824890773307 0.244859090653576 T 0.760344588945630 T 0.775075026157261 0.014730437211631 T 0.778713834670571 0.003638808513309 0.247026511231876 T 0.77962079354057 0.000906958870001 0.249246110831069 This shows that doubling the number of stripes is four times as close to the exact value.

  2. Numerical Methods coursework

    Therefore the "error multiplier" is 0.25. The Trapezium Rule is a "second order method". Error in the Midpoint Rule The error connected to the Midpoint Rule is the same as the error as in the Trapezium Rule. That means that halving h or doubling n will reduce the error by a factor of 0.25.

  1. Sequences and series investigation

    2(n -1) (n - 1) + 2n - 1 2) 2(n2 - 2n + 1) + 2n - 1 3) 2n2 - 4n + 2 + 2n - 1 4) 2n2 - 2n + 1 Therefore my final equation is: 2n2 - 2n + 1 Proving My Equation and Using

  2. Borders Coursework

    8 27 64 125 +7 +19 +37 +61 +12 +18 +24 +6 +6 General equation for Cubic sequences: an3 + bn2 + cn + d To find 'a' in the formula: a= 3rd difference in sequence 3rd difference in cubic sequence So: 8/6 = 4/3 =1?

  1. Numerical solutions of equations

    the point of intersection between y = x and y = g(x) = (-4x2+2)1/5 is between x = 0 and x = 1. Like before, I will take my starting value of x (x1) to be 0.5. The same process of substituting values of x into the iterative formula, as in the last Rearrangement is carried out here.

  2. Fixed point iteration: Rearrangement method explained

    Hence -1 < g?(x) < 1. If I was to zoom into the point of intersection: I can see that the gradient of g(x) is below 1 because it is not as steep as y = x at any point through the intersection.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work