• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

Investigate the three different numerical methods used to solve equations.

Extracts from this document...


Solving Equations by Numerical Methods Introduction In this coursework I am going to investigate the three different numerical methods used to solve equations. These include the change of sign method, Newton Raphson method and the Rearranging method. To carry out the investigation I will explain how each method works, using an example of a working equation in each case. I will also show when each of the methods will not work with other equations. I will then compare all three of the methods. Change of sign method Decimal search and Interval bisection are both ways of finding an interval where there is a change of sign. The change of sign can be found on a graph when the line crosses the x-axis. Wherever there is a change of sign there will be a root. These two methods find the interval where the root lies. Decimal Search To find the roots using decimal search, the y-values must be found, using the values of X from 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, all the way up to 1. When a change of sign occurs, this means there is a root lying here. Once the root interval to 1 decimal place has been found, it must then be found to 2 and 3 decimal places and so on to the required number of places. ...read more.


n Xn Xn+1 1 -2 -8.6 2 -8.6 877.8978571 3 877.8978571 -3417800597 4 -3417800597 1.99623E+29 5 1.99623E+29 -3.97741E+88 6 -3.97741E+88 #NUM! 7 #NUM! #NUM! After entering my formula into the spreadsheet, the table confirms what the graph displayed. The curve of the equation is too steep on both sides of the root. When a tangent is drawn at -2 it crosses the x-axis way past the root at -8.6 and so it is diverging away from the root. This confirms that the Newton Raphson method will not find the roots in this case. Rearranging Equations If you use any f(x) equation and rearrange it into the form x = g(x) the point on the graph f(x) where y = 0 (The root) is the same x-value as the point where y = g(x) crosses the line y = x. To find the roots, I need to find the point where the line y = g(x) crosses the line y = x. I will put in an estimate value of x (X0) and it will lead to a better estimate (X1). I have chosen the equation f(x) = x3-3x+1 This can then be rearranged into the form: 3x = x3+1 x = (x3+1) ...read more.


From the table it can be concluded that the Newton Raphson method is the quickest of the three as it shows convergence very quickly each time. The decimal search is the slowest by far of the three methods. It can take around 25 steps to home in on the root. At first the Rearrangement and Newton Raphson methods appear to be the most difficult to use, since the formulas must be calculated before hand. Once the formula has been calculated and inputted for the first estimate, after this it is very simple. When using a spreadsheet it can then just be dragged down until it produces convergence. Even including the calculations needed for the Newton Raphson and rearrangement method, they still prove to be far quicker than either of the change of sign methods. The main advantage of the change of sign method over the other 2 methods is that it is easy to find all of the roots to almost any equation. Overall I would say that the Newton Raphson method is the most efficient of the three. Although there is some preparation before using the method, it still ends up being the quickest. Pure Mathematics 2 Coursework Michael Hatt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    Here is the proof: Newton Raphson method This method works by plotting the f(x) on a graph and visually looking at between what two points the root is (in single units such as 1 or 5 or 9). Then we draw a tangent at that point on the graph. E.g.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    4.001 768.768288 768.5761 3 243 3.1 277.0563 357.492 3 243 3.01 246.256236 327.2508 3 243 3.001 243.324162 324.3241 2 48 2.1 58.3443 111.132 2 48 2.01 48.96722403 97.44721 2 48 2.001 48.09607202 96.14407 1 3 1.1 4.3923 15.972 1 3 1.01 3.12181203 12.36361 1 3 1.001 3.012018012 12.03604 x x4

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    People spent more from 1982to end of 1980s for they faced less uncertainty. Therefore, uncertainty, which represent by U, also should be included into the consumption function. Thus the function has been modified as followed: ?ct=c0+c1?yt+c2st-1+c3?t+c4HPt+c5Ut fits the equation to the data, we can gain the equation s follow: DLC

  2. Am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can't be solved algebraically

    I am confident that I can have this root to four decimal places giving error bounds. Therefore the root is x = 1.467443089= 1.46745 + 0.00005 Results from other two roots x0 = 0 x1 =0.334026333 x2 =0.615299538 x3 =0.348013325 x4 =0.334012999 x5 =0.334026363 x6 =0.334026364 x7 = 0.334026364 x1=

  1. C3 Coursework: Numerical Methods

    The x=g(x) method uses the gradient of the equation to find estimates of the roots. Each iteration from the starting point gives a better estimation of the root. To use the x=g(x) method the equation is first written in the form x=g(x)

  2. C3 Mei - Numerical Methods to solve equations

    x f(x) 0 -0.61962 -0.1 -0.48442 -0.2 -0.35482 -0.3 -0.23682 -0.4 -0.13642 -0.5 -0.05962 -0.6 -0.01242 -0.7 -0.00082 -0.8 -0.03082 -0.9 -0.10842 -1 -0.23962 The table clearly shows that decimal search has failed to find the root as there is no sign change and f(x)

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    of excel; I should be able to produce a formula on excel for the secant method thus making this method suitable for this equation. False position method: The false position method is similar to the secant method in the sense that it uses a straight line to approximate the function of the area of interest.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    or -0.54113([-1, 0]) or 0.82868([0, 1]). Hence g?(root) in the interval [0, 1]= -1.4617 As g?(x) < -1, we can expect that the iteration to diverge away from the root in a cobweb fashion. This can be shown on the graph above, and therefore this must be correct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work