• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

maths pure

Extracts from this document...


MEI PURE 2 COURSEWORK SOLUTION OF EQUATIONS BY NUMERICAL METHODS 1. Change of Sign Method This method makes use of the fact f(x) changes sign at a root of an equation. f(x) must be a continuous function i.e. it must not have any asymptotes or other breaks in it. Once an interval in which f(x) changes sign is located, we know that that interval contains a root. It is best to sketch the diagram of f(x) first so that we can see how many roots the equation has and their approximate positions. Decimal Search The equation that will be investigated here is f(x) = 4x3+5, a diagram of which is shown below. From the graph we can see that there is only one root. Zooming in, as shown below, we can also see that this root lies between X=-1 and X=-2 Taking increments in x of 0.1 within the interval [-2, -1] and working out the value of the function f(x) = 4x3+5 for each one and then seeing where the sign changes will enable the narrowing down of the interval. x -2 -1.9 -1.8 -1.7 -1.6 -1.5 -1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 f(x) -27 -22.4 -18.3 -14.7 -11.4 -8.5 -6.0 -3.8 -1.9 -0.3 1 The values calculated in the table above have only been given to 1 decimal place as we are only looking for a change in sign at this stage. ...read more.


will be very small. This will result in x2 not being close to the root. The values that are being computed may converge but it may be that they are converging towards a root other than the one we are trying to locate. 3. Rearranging f(x) = 0 in the form x = g(x) When trying to solve an equation f(x) = 0 by an iterative method, we first rearrange f(x) = 0 into a form x=g(x). The iteration formula is then? xn+1 = g(xn) The equation that will be looked at here is x3-3x-5=0, the graph of which is illustrated below. As can be seen above there is a root close to x=2. Rearranging the equation x3-3x-5=0 gives x = 3?(3x+5) Using the formula? xn+1 = 3?(3x+5) and starting with x0 = 2, the results for successive iterations are as follows: X0 2 X1 2.223980091 X2 2.268372388 X3 2.276967161 X4 2.278623713 X5 2.278942719 From this we can conclude that the root of the equation is 2.279 to 3 d.p. The convergence of a root such as this is often described as a staircase approach; why this is can be seen from the diagram below: The successive steps taken to approach the root is like that of a staircase with the values of xn approaching from one side. ...read more.


The rearranging method can be tedious in the sense that once the equation is rearranged, it has to be checked each time by differentiating and using an approximate value for the root. Again, similar to the Newton-Raphson method, if the rearranged function is a large, complex one a significant amount of time may be spent on the calculus part and with this method there is the added uncertainty that even when the function is differentiated it may not be suitable i.e. it may produce a diverging sequence. The use of SPA Software Omnigraph, Microsoft Excel and my Casio graphical calculator was beneficial for all three methods. Graphs could be easily plotted so that approximate values for boundaries could be seen and calculations were speeded up by the use of formulae functions. Although the use of software and hardware benefited all three methods it is perhaps the change of sign method that was speeded up most as virtually all the calculation with regards to this technique could be done by Excel/Graphical calculator. The other two techniques required differentiation which had to be done by hand. However, if the equation is a simple one that can be differentiated easily, the Newton-Raphson method, once programmed onto a computer is undoubtedly the quickest and reaches a high degree of accuracy in a relatively short amount of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    Using this formula, the next 5 values of x and the gradient are: 4 256 1280 5 625 3125 6 1296 6480 7 2401 12005 8 4096 20480 9 6561 32805 General proof - (x+h)5 - x5 = x^5 + 5x4h + 10x�h� + 10x�h� + 5xh4 +h5 - x5

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    and yt =log (Yt), ct is the elasticity of consumption respect to income. Another consumption function can be gained from the same data. It is: LC=+0.7504+0.9383*LY The R2 in this case is 0.996608. Compare with the first equation's R^2, which is 0.99624, this more close to unity.

  1. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    to T128 is much quicker than calculating the real value. This is how the values of T above T128 are calculated in my spreadsheet. It must be noted that the assumption being made is that the ratio of gaps (table 1.0)

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    One thing to note is the amount of iterations for the bisection method compared to secant and false position, bisection has a lot more iterations. As a result the value of K is a constant when the first order of convergence is used.

  1. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    The more decimal place the more accurate the answer of the root is. X Y -0.69 -0.050563533 -0.68 -0.029629888 -0.67 -0.009507116 -0.66 0.009848393 -0.65 0.028477721 -0.64 0.046419535 -0.63 0.063710194 -0.62 0.080383854 -0.61 0.096472572 Tbl DS-03: Step 3 X Y -0.669 -0.007537736 -0.668 -0.005575983 -0.667 -0.003621818 -0.666 -0.001675197 -0.665 0.000263921 -0.664

  2. Change of sign method.

    I chose to start looking trying to find the roots for the equation: 3(x/2)3-4(x/2)+1.5=0 so I plotted the graph of y=3(x/2)3 -4(x/2)+1.5 in autograph. I can see that there are three roots to my equation, in the intervals [0, 1], [1, 2], [-2, -3].

  1. The Gradient Fraction

    This graph will be at a minimum curve. When a curve is at a minimum it always encompasses a gradient which goes from a negative to a positive. y=x2 is a minimum curved graph. Results x Gradient 3 6.54 4 8.33 -2 -4.44 From this graph, the results achieved are not absolute accurate, this is due to the graph plot.

  2. Mathematics Coursework - OCR A Level

    The black line shows the method converging and coming closer and close to the solution. x-value x-y 0.31 0.31 0.2225 0.08751 0.2621 0.03965 0.245 0.01714 0.2526 0.007625 0.2493 0.003356 0.2508 0.001485 0.2501 0.0006553 0.2504 0.0002896 0.2503 0.0001279 0.2503 5.65E-05 0.2503 2.495E-05 0.2503 1.102E-05 0.2503 4.869E-06 0.2503 2.151E-06 0.2503 9.501E-07 0.2503

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work