• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

maths pure

Extracts from this document...


MEI PURE 2 COURSEWORK SOLUTION OF EQUATIONS BY NUMERICAL METHODS 1. Change of Sign Method This method makes use of the fact f(x) changes sign at a root of an equation. f(x) must be a continuous function i.e. it must not have any asymptotes or other breaks in it. Once an interval in which f(x) changes sign is located, we know that that interval contains a root. It is best to sketch the diagram of f(x) first so that we can see how many roots the equation has and their approximate positions. Decimal Search The equation that will be investigated here is f(x) = 4x3+5, a diagram of which is shown below. From the graph we can see that there is only one root. Zooming in, as shown below, we can also see that this root lies between X=-1 and X=-2 Taking increments in x of 0.1 within the interval [-2, -1] and working out the value of the function f(x) = 4x3+5 for each one and then seeing where the sign changes will enable the narrowing down of the interval. x -2 -1.9 -1.8 -1.7 -1.6 -1.5 -1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 f(x) -27 -22.4 -18.3 -14.7 -11.4 -8.5 -6.0 -3.8 -1.9 -0.3 1 The values calculated in the table above have only been given to 1 decimal place as we are only looking for a change in sign at this stage. ...read more.


will be very small. This will result in x2 not being close to the root. The values that are being computed may converge but it may be that they are converging towards a root other than the one we are trying to locate. 3. Rearranging f(x) = 0 in the form x = g(x) When trying to solve an equation f(x) = 0 by an iterative method, we first rearrange f(x) = 0 into a form x=g(x). The iteration formula is then? xn+1 = g(xn) The equation that will be looked at here is x3-3x-5=0, the graph of which is illustrated below. As can be seen above there is a root close to x=2. Rearranging the equation x3-3x-5=0 gives x = 3?(3x+5) Using the formula? xn+1 = 3?(3x+5) and starting with x0 = 2, the results for successive iterations are as follows: X0 2 X1 2.223980091 X2 2.268372388 X3 2.276967161 X4 2.278623713 X5 2.278942719 From this we can conclude that the root of the equation is 2.279 to 3 d.p. The convergence of a root such as this is often described as a staircase approach; why this is can be seen from the diagram below: The successive steps taken to approach the root is like that of a staircase with the values of xn approaching from one side. ...read more.


The rearranging method can be tedious in the sense that once the equation is rearranged, it has to be checked each time by differentiating and using an approximate value for the root. Again, similar to the Newton-Raphson method, if the rearranged function is a large, complex one a significant amount of time may be spent on the calculus part and with this method there is the added uncertainty that even when the function is differentiated it may not be suitable i.e. it may produce a diverging sequence. The use of SPA Software Omnigraph, Microsoft Excel and my Casio graphical calculator was beneficial for all three methods. Graphs could be easily plotted so that approximate values for boundaries could be seen and calculations were speeded up by the use of formulae functions. Although the use of software and hardware benefited all three methods it is perhaps the change of sign method that was speeded up most as virtually all the calculation with regards to this technique could be done by Excel/Graphical calculator. The other two techniques required differentiation which had to be done by hand. However, if the equation is a simple one that can be differentiated easily, the Newton-Raphson method, once programmed onto a computer is undoubtedly the quickest and reaches a high degree of accuracy in a relatively short amount of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    Therefore, my prediction was correct. y=x^4 x y second point x second point y gradient 3 81 3.1 92.3521 113.521 3 81 3.01 82.08541201 108.5412 3 81 3.001 81.10805401 108.05401 4 256 4.1 282.5761 265.761 4 256 4.01 258.569616 256.9616 4 256 4.001 256.256096 256.09602 2 16 2.1 19.4481 34.481

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    There is another method can be used to estimate whether the equation fits the data properly is look at how well the equation predicts consumption. This is done in Figure1. The Figure 1 (a) has two lines, the red line is the actual value, the blue line is the fitted value (predicted value).

  1. Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

    (x+0.1)-0.0008 Consequently, we have got a root of -0.32021 (to five decimal places) between the interval [-1, 0]. The answer obtained in fact is one of the right roots. However, from the graph above, the graph intersects the x-axis three times, thereby giving 3 different roots.

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    multiple formulas in order to satisfy the methods, for more information on the formulas read the sections below where it deeply talks about them and how they were created. Solution to the problem: Method of bisection: To use the method of bisection, we must rearrange the equation so it = 0.

  1. Using Decimal search

    0.9 1 0.2 0.055 -0.06 -0.115 -0.08 0.075 0.38 0.865 1.56 2.495 3.7 Therefore Xn+1 = x - (5x^3-1.5x+0.2) 15x^2-1.5 = 15x^3-1.5x-(5x^3-1.5x+0.2) 15x^2-1.5 = 15x^3-1.5x-5x^3+1.5x-0.2 15x^2-1.5 Xn+1 = 10x^3-0.2 => The Newton-Raphson method for eq'n 15x^2-1.5 5x^3-1.5x+0.2=0 Results are as follows: X 0.3 -0.46667 -0.68847 -0.61736 -0.60540 -0.60507 Xn+1 -0.46667

  2. Analyse the use of three methods which are called the: change of sign, Newton-Raphson ...

    This procedure is repeated until an accurate value for x is obtained. A 1 x 2 =g(A1) 3 =g(A2) 4 =g(A3) 5 =g(A4) 6 Fill down until 2 adjacent values are identical Example I am now going to use the above method for the equation: 5x3-6.5x2-4x+3.15=0 Y=f(x)

  1. 2D and 3D Sequences Project

    2 6 18 38 66 2nd differ. 4 12 20 28 36 3rd differ. 8 8 8 8 So therefore we get the equation; an� + bn<sup>2</sup> + cn + d We already know the values of 'n' (position in sequence) in the equation so now we have to find out the values of a, b, c, and d.

  2. Change of Sign Method.

    follows: The 'new x values' can be seen to be getting further and further apart, i.e. they appear to be diverging. The Fixed Point Iteration method has therefore failed, due to the fact that the successive iterations are diverging from the required interval of [1,2].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work