• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Numerical Methods Coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Paul Koleoso        30083490

For this coursework, I am going to use knowledge of numerical methods to produce an approximation to an area which does not have an analytic solution.

Problem .    I would be finding the approximation of the integral on the graph between the shaded portion of the graph above which is from 0 to 1 using numerical integration.

This problem was chosen because it cannot be integrated by any analytical method, therefore approximation method would be used. Due to this I suggest that this problem will be appropriate for numerical solution.

Strategy

To solve this problem, I am going to use knowledge of numerical integration studied in the Numerical Methods textbook.

Numerical integration is a method used to approximate an area under the graph. According to syllabus on NM module, the approximate methods of definite integrals may be determined by numerical integration using;

1. Mid – point rule
2. Trapezium rule
3. Simpson’s rule

Since there are lots mathematical functions which can not be integrated in real life, an alternative approach to these problems are to sub-divide the area under the graph into strips or shapes such as rectangles which approximately covers the area.

Middle

= k ²   =   This means that halving h, or equivalently doubling n will reduce the error by a factor of = 0.25. Since the absolute error is proportional to h². It is a second order method.

Also trapezium rule is similar to the mid- point rule. Error is also proportional to h². Therefore this also means halving h, or equivalently doubling n will reduce the error by a factor of = 0.25. Since the absolute error is proportional to h². It is a second order method.

Viewing error in terms of differences and ratio differences

When the values for the number of strips double, the ratio difference between successive estimates is the same.

Conclusion

The problem specified . can also be written as ³.                            Microsoft Excel might find it complicated to solve square roots. So I suggest error might have occurred, therefore affecting the validity of my result.

For example; )² -   If I had more time I could have increased the accuracy of my result by finding the real answer and not using extrapolated values to find “M16”, “T32” ,“M32”and “T64”, as this could have improved the validity of my result and therefore making my answer to the solution more accurate by producing the solution to a higher degree of significant figures. Also to improve the validity of my result Simpson’s rule could have been used. This is because in Simpson’s rule error is proportional to , which means it is a fourth order method  and also when you halve the width of the strip or you equivalently doubled the number of strips, this would reduced the absolute error with a scale factor of 0.0625.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1. ## MEI numerical Methods

the formula described above we would have an approximation of the root closer to the real root X(3), then I would use x(2) and x(3). The secant method always uses the two most recent approximations of the root. I will produce an answer to 9 significant figures by the use

2. ## Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

of this equation have been find by method of rearrangement to form and it is. To compare and contrast three methods I have to find this root again by using other method and see which method gives a better result, less time consuming and ease of use with available hardware and software.

1. ## Best shape for gutter and further alegbra - using Excel to solve some mathematical ...

best cross section to use for a gutter to carry the maximum water capacity is a semi circle. 2) Using Excel; it will take 21 months to clear the debt. Of which that last month is a small payment under �70.

2. ## Numerical Methods coursework

To work with formulae in Excel is easier than using the calculator and saves a lot of time. It is more accurate as well, using values accurate to 15 decimal places.

1. ## Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

f(??? ?f(??) > the area of the underneath the curve in figure 1.0 is thus h f(??) + h f(??????h f(??) + h f(??? ???h f(??) > this can be generalised to Mn= h [f(??) + f(?????(??) + f(???????????f(?n)] Note that Mn is dependent on the number of rectangles.

2. ## C3 Coursework: Numerical Methods

The able shows that there is change of sign from 0.752 to 0.753. This means that the root of the equation must lie between 0.752 and 0.753. Our estimate of the root is with a maximum error of � 0.0005.

1. ## Numerical integration coursework

Trapezium rule The trapezium rule is very similar to the mid-point rule in that it also divides the area up into strips; however the difference is that instead of using rectangles trapeziums are used, as shown.

2. ## C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

34 0.87936 -0.00019 The root lies between 0.87938 and 0.87939 So to 4 d.p. the root has value 0.8794. 35 0.87937 -0.00012 36 0.87938 -4.00E-05 Secondly, I will use Newton Raphson method to find the same root in the interval [0, 1]: First of all, I need to rearrange the equation x³+3x²–3=0 to the formulae of Newton Raphson ( ) • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 