• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C3 Coursework                Raoul Harris

C3 Coursework

Change of sign (decimal search)

Finding a root of an equation with graphical illustration

f(x)=x3-7x2+2x+1

This is graph of y=x3-7x2+2x+1

image00.png

The graph shows that roots of f(x)=0 exist in the intervals [-1,0]; [0,1]; [6,7]

We shall test for a root in the interval [6,7]

image01.png

x

f(x)

6.0

-23

6.1

-20.289

6.2

-17.352

6.3

-14.183

6.4

-10.776

6.5

-7.125

6.6

-3.224

6.7

0.933

Change of sign indicates root exists in interval [6.6,6.7]

This means that x=6.65±0.05image12.png

x=7 (0d.p.)

x

f(x)

6.60

-3.224

6.61

-2.81992

6.62

-2.41327

6.63

-2.00405

6.64

-1.59226

6.65

-1.17787

6.66

-0.7609

6.67

-0.34134

6.68

0.080832


Change of sign indicates root in interval [6.67,6.68]

This means that x=6.675±0.005

x=6.7 (1d.p.)

image13.png

x

f(x)

6.670

-0.34134

6.671

-0.29924

6.672

-0.25711

6.673

-0.21496

6.674

-0.17278

6.675

-0.13058

6.676

-0.08835

6.677

-0.04609

6.678

-0.00381

6.679

0.038498

Change of sign indicates root in interval [6.678,6.679]

This means that x=6.6785±0.0005

x=6.68 (2d.p.)image14.png

X

f(x)

6.6780

-0.00381

6.6781

0.000419

Change of sign indicates root in interval [6.6780,6.6781]

This means that x=6.67805±0.00005

x = 6.678 (3d.p.)

Failure of the decimal search

Two of the roots of f(x)=0 where f(x)=5x3-20x2+2x-0.05 could not be found with this method. This is because they are so close together that there is no sign change between f(0) and f(0.1). The graph on the next page shows the graph of y=f(x)

...read more.

Middle

Finding the remaining root

The other root can be found using x1=-2.

xn

f(xn)

f'(xn)

x1

-2

-2.12500

30.27344

x2

-1.92981

-0.87732

10.43071

x3

-1.84570

-0.29110

4.65311

x4

-1.78314

-0.05792

2.98408

x5

-1.76373

-0.00339

2.64527

x6

-1.76245

-0.00001

2.62496

x7

-1.76244

0.00000

2.62488

x8

-1.76244

0.00000

2.62488

x=2.62488 (5d.p.)

Failure of the Newton-Raphson method

The method fails for the same function if x1=0

xn

f(xn)

f'(xn)

x1

0

0.60317

-0.14172

x2

4.25600

1.05148

-0.02495

x3

46.40573

1.00046

-0.00002

x4

Value could not be found

1.00000

0.00000

The value diverges, despite the starting value being close to the root. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below:

image04.png


Fixed point iteration with x=g(x)

Finding a root

f(x)=x5-4x+3

The graph of y=f(x):

image05.png

We shall rearrange the equation into the form x=g(x) to find roots of f(x)=0.

0= x5-4x+3

x5=4x-3

x=(4x-3)1/5

xn+1=(4xn-3)(1/5)

We shall take a starting value of x1=-1.

x1

-1

x2

-1.47577

x3

-1.54849

x4

-1.55848

x5

-1.55983

x6

-1.56001

x7

-1.56004

x8

-1.56004

x=-1.56004 (5d.p.)

Graphical illustration

The graph below shows the lines y=x and y=g(x). The lines intersect at the roots of f(x)=0.

image06.pngimage07.png

image08.png

The importance of the magnitude of g’(x)

For a root of f(x)

...read more.

Conclusion

The Newton-Raphson method is more difficult to automate because f'(x) must be found. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x).

Fixed point iteration with x=g(x) can be carried using programs like Autograph. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations.

Overall the change of sign method is the easiest as it is purely numerical calculation. Newton-Raphson is the second simplest because it fails far less often than x=g(x).

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    I shall try and investigate this. 3x� x y second value x second value y gradient 4 48 4.1 50.43 24.6 4 48 4.01 48.2403 24.06 4 48 4.001 48.024003 24.006 3 27 3.1 28.83 18.6 3 27 3.01 27.1803 18.06 3 27 3.001 27.018003 18.006 2 12 2.1 13.23

  2. Numerical Methods coursework

    Therefore the "error multiplier" is 0.0625. The Trapezium Rule is a "fourth order method". Error in terms of differences and ratio of differences The "error multiplier" mentioned in the part above is the same as the ratio of differences on the spreadsheet.

  1. Mathematics Coursework - OCR A Level

    the root as -1.07375 with an error bound of + or - 0.00005 Equation that does not work: The graph below is the graph of y= x4 - 1/3 x + 0.01. Zoom in of graph at point where it crosses x-axis.

  2. Methods of Advanced Mathematics (C3) Coursework.

    0.927512 -2.41 1.052479 -2.4 1.176 -2.5 -0.125 -2.499 -0.11126 -2.498 -0.09753 -2.497 -0.08382 -2.496 -0.07012 -2.495 -0.05644 -2.494 -0.04277 -2.493 -0.02912 -2.492 -0.01548 -2.491 -0.00186 -2.49 0.011751 From this I can see that the route lies between -2.491 and -2.490�0.0005 and is found at 0.011751 � 0.0000005.

  1. Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

    � 1.40 x 10-9 8.44 x 10-7 � 1.40 x 10-9m 100 lines/mm 1st Fringe x = 0.303 � 0.002m, uncertainty = 0.002/0.303 x 100 � 0.660% L = 4.410 � 0.002m, uncertainty = 0.002/4.410 x 100 � 0.045% 0.660% + 0.045% = 0.705% 0.705% of 6.87 x 10-7 �

  2. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

    =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+9 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+9 =(B4+C4)/4 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+9 =IF(G4>0,B4,F6) =IF(G4>0,F4,C6) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+10 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+10 =(B4+C4)/5 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+10 =IF(G4>0,B4,F7) =IF(G4>0,F4,C7) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+11 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+11 =(B4+C4)/6 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+11 =IF(G4>0,B4,F8) =IF(G4>0,F4,C8) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+12 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+12 =(B4+C4)/7 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+12 =IF(G4>0,B4,F9) =IF(G4>0,F4,C9) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+13 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+13 =(B4+C4)/8 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+13 =IF(G4>0,B4,F10) =IF(G4>0,F4,C10) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+14 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+14 =(B4+C4)/9 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+14 =IF(G4>0,B4,F11) =IF(G4>0,F4,C11) =2*B4^3-3*B4^2-8*B4+15 =2*C4^3-3*C4^2-8*C4+15 =(B4+C4)/10 =2*F4^3-3*F4^2-8*F4+15 =IF(G4>0,B4,F12)

  1. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

    it had an error bound of, in other words it had a solution bound of with a maximum error. This method can also be shown graphically by computer: This method can be drawn in software 'autograph'. By using this program the equation can be enter and there is a function

  2. Numerical integration coursework

    Trapezium rule The trapezium rule is very similar to the mid-point rule in that it also divides the area up into strips; however the difference is that instead of using rectangles trapeziums are used, as shown.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work