• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13

OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C3 Coursework                Raoul Harris

C3 Coursework

Change of sign (decimal search)

Finding a root of an equation with graphical illustration

f(x)=x3-7x2+2x+1

This is graph of y=x3-7x2+2x+1

The graph shows that roots of f(x)=0 exist in the intervals [-1,0]; [0,1]; [6,7]

We shall test for a root in the interval [6,7]

 x f(x) 6.0 -23 6.1 -20.289 6.2 -17.352 6.3 -14.183 6.4 -10.776 6.5 -7.125 6.6 -3.224 6.7 0.933

This means that x=6.65±0.05

x=7 (0d.p.)

 x f(x) 6.60 -3.224 6.61 -2.81992 6.62 -2.41327 6.63 -2.00405 6.64 -1.59226 6.65 -1.17787 6.66 -0.7609 6.67 -0.34134 6.68 0.080832

This means that x=6.675±0.005

x=6.7 (1d.p.)

 x f(x) 6.670 -0.34134 6.671 -0.29924 6.672 -0.25711 6.673 -0.21496 6.674 -0.17278 6.675 -0.13058 6.676 -0.08835 6.677 -0.04609 6.678 -0.00381 6.679 0.038498

This means that x=6.6785±0.0005

x=6.68 (2d.p.)

 X f(x) 6.6780 -0.00381 6.6781 0.000419

This means that x=6.67805±0.00005

x = 6.678 (3d.p.)

Failure of the decimal search

Two of the roots of f(x)=0 where f(x)=5x3-20x2+2x-0.05 could not be found with this method. This is because they are so close together that there is no sign change between f(0) and f(0.1). The graph on the next page shows the graph of y=f(x)

Middle

Finding the remaining root

The other root can be found using x1=-2.

 xn f(xn) f'(xn) x1 -2 -2.12500 30.27344 x2 -1.92981 -0.87732 10.43071 x3 -1.84570 -0.29110 4.65311 x4 -1.78314 -0.05792 2.98408 x5 -1.76373 -0.00339 2.64527 x6 -1.76245 -0.00001 2.62496 x7 -1.76244 0.00000 2.62488 x8 -1.76244 0.00000 2.62488

x=2.62488 (5d.p.)

Failure of the Newton-Raphson method

The method fails for the same function if x1=0

 xn f(xn) f'(xn) x1 0 0.60317 -0.14172 x2 4.25600 1.05148 -0.02495 x3 46.40573 1.00046 -0.00002 x4 Value could not be found 1.00000 0.00000

The value diverges, despite the starting value being close to the root. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below:

Fixed point iteration with x=g(x)

Finding a root

f(x)=x5-4x+3

The graph of y=f(x):

We shall rearrange the equation into the form x=g(x) to find roots of f(x)=0.

0= x5-4x+3

x5=4x-3

x=(4x-3)1/5

xn+1=(4xn-3)(1/5)

We shall take a starting value of x1=-1.

 x1 -1 x2 -1.47577 x3 -1.54849 x4 -1.55848 x5 -1.55983 x6 -1.56001 x7 -1.56004 x8 -1.56004

x=-1.56004 (5d.p.)

Graphical illustration

The graph below shows the lines y=x and y=g(x). The lines intersect at the roots of f(x)=0.

The importance of the magnitude of g’(x)

For a root of f(x)

Conclusion

The Newton-Raphson method is more difficult to automate because f'(x) must be found. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x).

Fixed point iteration with x=g(x) can be carried using programs like Autograph. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations.

Overall the change of sign method is the easiest as it is purely numerical calculation. Newton-Raphson is the second simplest because it fails far less often than x=g(x).

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

5 star(s)

3(x+h)� - x� = 3(x� +3x�h + 3h�x+h�) -3x� = 3h(3x� +3hx + h�) = x + h - x h h 3(3x� +3hx + h�) = 9x� + 9hx +3h� = 9x�* - "h" limits to 0. axn value gradient function x3 3x2 2x3 6x2 3x3 9x2 This pattern

2. MEI numerical Methods

Formula used for spreadsheet: Proof of root: Another way to check the root is to check the upper and lower bounds of the interval in which my root lies in. The interval in which the root has to lie in is, 0.4797310065 < x < 0.4797310075 (this is due to the error being � 0.0000000005, as explained later)

1. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

In other words if the gradient is greater than 1 then iteration is not found due to the sequence diverges instead of converges. This can be shown by When, and .its modulus value (0.625) is smaller than 1 therefore this iteration is working properly and converges to root.

2. Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

rate, for the values close to 1 and less than one---slow rate and for the values bigger than one---divergence which implies the presence of failure. In sum, the method will eventually converge to a root k, given that the absolute value of the slope of k------ is less than 1.

1. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

As the figures show blow: x x=(2x�+3x�-2)/5 n g'(x) 0 -0.4 0 0 -0.4 -0.3296 1 -0.288 -0.3296 -0.349140895 2 -0.26516 -0.3491409 -0.343884402 3 -0.27269 -0.3438844 -0.345312735 4 -0.27075 -0.34531273 -0.344925628 5 -0.27129 -0.34492563 -0.345030617 6 -0.27114 -0.34503062 -0.345002148 7 -0.27118 -0.34500215 -0.345009868 8 -0.27117 -0.34500987 -0.345007774 9 -0.27117 -0.34500777

2. Numerical Methods coursework

To work with formulae in Excel is easier than using the calculator and saves a lot of time. It is more accurate as well, using values accurate to 15 decimal places.

1. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

In addition, being a second order polynomial means that as the number of strips (n) double the absolute error should be multiplied by (1/22). Therefore, I would expect the absolute error of M32 to be (1/22) of the absolute error of M16.

2. C3 Mei - Numerical Methods to solve equations

The function has a repeated root; therefore the decimal search will fail to find the root. The two diagrams above show that there is a root present, however, as there is a double root, decimal search has failed. x f(x)

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to