• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Portfolio - Stopping Distances

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

image17.pngimage18.png

image00.png


Stopping Distancesimage04.pngimage01.png

When a driver stops her car, she must first think to apply the brakes. Then the brakes must actually stop the vehicle.

The table below lists the average times for these processes at various speeds.

Table 1. average times for these processes at various speeds

Speed (kmh-1)

Thinking distance (m)

Braking distance (m)

Stopping distance (m)

32

6

6

12

48

9

14

23

64

12

24

36

80

15

38

53

96

18

55

73

112

21

75

96

Using this table we can graph two data plots: (i) Speed versus Thinking distance, (ii) Speed versus Braking distance, and (iiI) Speed versus Stopping distance

  1. Speed versus Thinking distance

Table 2. Speed versus Thinking distance

Speed (kmh-1)

Thinking distance (km)

32

0.006

48

0.009

64

0.012

80

0.015

96

0.018

112

0.021

Graph 1. Speed versus Thinking distance

image19.png

This is clearly a linear graph since we can see a straight line. This shows us that the correlation between speed and thinking distance is directly proportional, meaning that as speed increases the thinking distance will also increase. In other words, as the speed of a car increases it takes a longer time for the driver to think about applying the breaks.

Since this graph is linear we can develop a model to fit the data using the equation y= mx+b where m stands for gradient and b stands for the y-intercept.

Steps taken:

  1. First we find the gradient m
...read more.

Middle

table 1 and the function
image47.png

Graph 4. Quadratic model for Speed versus Braking distanceimage02.png

image48.pngimage03.png

However, because it is a quadratic we have to evaluate whether the negatives will be a good fit to represent the data. Below is a graph showing the same graph as above but with an extended window frame.

Graph 5. Quadratic model for Speed versus Braking distance with enlarged window frameimage02.png

image49.pngimage50.pngimage03.png

Here we can see that the plots match well on the right side. However since we cannot have negative speed the model is not a good fit despite that it is a good fit to represent the data on the right.

Having that said, the other option is the power function and it was chosen because it is polynomial and we can eliminate all negative values since the domain is within positive values.

Steps taken to develop power model using GDC:

  1. Insert data into GDC table

image51.png

L1 – Speed
L2 – Braking distance

  1. Use implemented Power Regression for variables L1 and L2

image52.png

image53.png

  1. Insert the information into STAT PLOT

image54.png

  1. Plot data from table

image56.png

Graph 6. Speed versus Braking distance

image57.pngimage02.pngimage03.png

  1. Implement power function into the graph

Graph 7. Power model for Speed versus Braking distance

image58.pngimage03.pngimage02.png

In the end we get a function: image59.pngimage59.png

...read more.

Conclusion

graph 16-17 and graph 19-20. This is because it adds function1 and function2, instead of calculating it algebraically by using equations which depend on the coordinates taken. However, I would say Model B is the best model to represent the data since in graph 18 we can see the function go through every data plot since the data plot is filled by black, whereas in graph 15 the function misses two data plots.

Now that we have a good model to represent the data, it is time to test whether this model would fit further data.

Table 5. New data plots

Speed (kmh-1)

Stopping distance (km)

10

0.0025

40

0.017

90

0.065

160

0.18

Table 6. Speed versus Stopping distance with new data

Speed (kmh-1)

Stopping distance (km)

10

0.0025

32

0.012

40

0.017

48

0.023

64

0.036

80

0.053

90

0.065

96

0.073

112

0.096

160

0.18

Graph 21. Speed versus Stopping time using Model B

image26.pngimage02.pngimage03.png

As we can see the model is a very good fit to represent the data since the function passes through all data plots. However, a more accurate function could be developed by using more data plots.

We also have to consider anomaly results since some things are not accounted for. For example, the friction between the tires and the road, and weather conditions affecting driver’s reaction time which may not fit my model accurately.

With more data plots we can make modifications to the function since all the current data plots fit the function.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    1158.56201 1345.6201 4 1024 4.01 1036.86416 1286.416 4 1024 4.001 1025.28064 1280.6402 2 32 2.1 40.84101 88.4101 2 32 2.01 32.8080401 80.80401 2 32 2.001 32.08008004 80.08004 1 1 1.1 1.61051 6.1051 1 1 1.01 1.05101005 5.101005 1 1 1.001 1.00501001 5.01001 x x4 5x4 1 1 5 2 16

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    There are 3 parameters in this equation. They are LC_1 , LY and constant. T-value are 6.11, 1.92 and 3.63. Where 1.92 is smaller than 2, which means that the coefficient of constant (0.206148) is insignificant in this equation.

  1. Math Portfolio Type II - Applications of Sinusoidal Functions

    The values of the parameters a, b, c, and d to the nearest thousandth are: a = 1.627 b = 0.016 c = 111.744 d = 6.248 The equation that represents the time of sunrise as a function of day number, n, for Toronto through sinusoidal regression is f(n)

  2. Analysing; The Reaction of Hydrogen Peroxide and Iodide ions

    x 100 = 2% Maximum error of 10 cm3 pipette = 0.1/ 10 x 100 = 1% Maximum error of burette = 0.15/25 x 100 = 6.0 x 10-3 % Maximum error of measuring cylinder = 0.5/25 x 100 = 2% Maximum error from apparatus reading = sum of maximum

  1. Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    The first of these should be reflected in ct-1. Rational expectation assumes that any "new" information has no relevance to information available at time t-1 or it would have been included in that calculation so this implies that the consumption function would be as follows: ct=c1ct-1 If we input our

  2. Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

    m would simply be the order of the fringe one considers. However, the value for ? is not given. Still, by shining the laser through a diffraction grating to display its interference pattern on a screen, one may calculate the distance from the grating to the screen L, and the

  1. Investigating the Quadratic Function.

    The expression x2 - 10x + 25 is a perfect square thus x2 - 10x + 25 = (x - 5)2. (b) This particular expression x2 - 10x + 32 is not a perfect square, however it can be broken down to a perfect square (x - h)2 with the

  2. Fractals. In order to create a fractal, you will need to be acquainted ...

    + z0 ever lands outside of the circle of radius 2 centered at the origin, then this orbit definitely tends to infinity. Therefore, 2i does not exist in the Mandelbrot since it quickly leaves the boundary after only one iteration: z0 = 0 z1 = 0 + 2i Enough of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work