• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

Pure 2 coursework - Decimal Search Method

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Pure 2 coursework

Decimal Search Method

In order to find the root of the function f(x)=3x3-7x2-11x+17, the decimal search method was used. This is the process whereby a table of values is constructed that show whether the value of f(x) with certain values of x is positive or negative. By zooming in on the places where the value of f(x) switches from positive to negative (or vice versa), values for the root of this function can be found.

x

f(x)

-4

-243

-3

-94

-2

-13

-1

18

0

17

1

2

2

-9

3

2

4

53

5

162

From this table, it is clear that there are roots where f(x)=0 when values of x lie between -2 and -1, 1 and 2, and 2 and 3. By concentrating on the interval of [1,2], the rot can be found to  a greater level of accuracy.

x

f(x)

1

2

1.1

0.423

1.2

-1.096

1.3

-2.539

1.4

-3.888

1.5

-5.125

1.6

-6.232

1.7

-7.191

1.8

-7.984

1.9

-8.593

2

-9

It is now clear that the root lies somewhere inside the interval of [1.1, 1.2]

x

f(x)

1.1

0.423

1.11

0.268193

1.12

0.113984

1.13

-0.03961

1.14

-0.19257

1.15

-0.34488

1.16

-0.49651

1.17

-0.64746

1.18

-0.7977

1.19

-0.94722

1.2

-1.096

The root is in the interval [1.12, 1.13]

x

f(x)

1.12

0.113984

1.121

0.098597

1.122

0.083216

1.123

0.067841

1.124

0.052472

1.125

0.037109

1.126

0.021753

1.127

0.006403

1.128

-0.00894

1.129

-0.02428

1.13

-0.03961

The root is somewhere inside the interval [1.127, 1.128]. It is required that the root be found to 3 decimal places. Therefore it is necessary to know the value of f(x) when x=1.1275

x

f(x)

1.1275

-0.00127

...read more.

Middle

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

1.44528

This table shows that the function has a root of 1.44528 ± 0.000005

x

xn+1

5.00000

6.07407

6.07407

5.76048

5.76048

5.72064

5.72064

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

5.72001

This table shows that the function has a root of 5.72001 ± 0.000005

Failure of Newton-Raphson Method

The Newton-Raphson method can fail to find the root of a function, as in the following example. The function is f(x)=20-((x-3)2+0.05)-1

It is clear from simply looking at the function that one root is going to be x=3. However, if the Newton-Raphson method is used, the following data is obtained

x

xn+1

3.4000

2.5600

2.5600

3.6320

3.6320

0.7936

0.7936

109.3000

As can be seen on the diagram below, these figures are clearly divergent, which means that xn+1 is further from the root than xn, and so are no use in finding the root of the function.

image00.png

Fixed Point Iteration

This method to find the roots of a function is done by rearranging the function f(x) into the form x=g(x). This can be explained with an example. If the expression xn+1=0.8+2.6/xn is used to create a large table of values for xn+1, it is found that after x50 and x51 are both 2.061324773. This means that xn+1 converges on this figure. If we let the limit L=2.061324773, then L satisfies the equation L=0.8+2.6/L and therefore L2-0.8L-2.6=0 and therefore L is a root of f(x). The function that I will be finding the roots of is f(x)=x3-4x2-7x+11. In order to find the roots, the equation f(x)=0 must be rearranged into the form x=g(x). Therefore, g(x) = (x3-4x2+11)/7

Now, xn+1=xn3-4xn2+11  is used to generate a table of values for xn, the results

  7

are as follows:

x

xn+1

2

0.428571

0.428571

1.477718

1.477718

0.784603

0.784603

1.288657

1.288657

0.928207

0.928207

1.193349

1.193349

1.000443

1.000443

1.142541

1.142541

1.038553

1.038553

1.115115

1.115115

1.058957

1.058957

1.100278

1.100278

1.069938

1.069938

1.092252

1.092252

1.075859

1.075859

1.087912

1.087912

1.079056

1.079056

1.085566

1.085566

1.080782

1.080782

1.084299

1.084299

1.081714

1.081714

1.083614

1.083614

1.082218

1.082218

1.083244

1.083244

1.08249

1.08249

1.083044

1.083044

1.082637

1.082637

1.082936

1.082936

1.082716

1.082716

1.082878

1.082878

1.082759

1.082759

1.082846

1.082846

1.082782

1.082782

1.082829

1.082829

1.082795

1.082795

1.08282

1.08282

1.082801

1.082801

1.082815

1.082815

1.082805

1.082805

1.082812

1.082812

1.082807

1.082807

1.082811

1.082811

1.082808

1.082808

1.08281

1.08281

1.082809

1.082809

1.08281

1.08281

1.082809

1.082809

1.082809

1.082809

1.082809

...read more.

Conclusion

Of the three methods, it is clear that the method that is the slowest to converge on the root is the decimal search method. The quickest to converge is the Newton-Raphson method, closely followed by the fixed point iteration. However, although both iteration methods can find the root correct to several decimal places very quickly, there is more initial work in order to start using these methods than there is for the decimal search. Formulae must be rearranged or new formulae constructed in order to begin the search. Also, a lot of the speed of the two iteration methods is due to the ability of a computer to quickly do repeat calculations many times over. They are well suited to the use of computers whereas the decimal search method is relatively slow even with the use of computers, as it would take a human to spot the change in sign that determines the next set of calculations.

Finally, there is no reason why the decimal search method could fail when used in conjunction with an graph plotted accurately by calculator or computer to determine the rough approximations of the roots, whereas with the other two methods there are functions where it is impossible to obtain an estimate of the roots.

Paul McKay        Page         09 May 2007

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    8.120601 12.0601 2 8 2.001 8.012006001 12.006001 1 1 1.1 1.331 3.31 1 1 1.01 1.030301 3.0301 1 1 1.001 1.003003001 3.003001 Gradient Function - x x2 3x2 1 1 3 2 4 12 3 9 27 4 16 48 Points Gradient 1,1 3 2,8 12 3,27 27 4,64 48

  2. Change of Sign Method.

    As the turning point of the graph was within the chosen interval, the Newton-Raphson method has failed. Comparison of Methods I shall now select one of the previously used equations and apply the other two numerical methods to find the root.

  1. Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

    Then the process is repeated, as shown in graph 2 The gradient of the tangent at (x1, f(x1)) is f'(x1). Since the equation of a straight line can be written y-y1 = m(x-x1), The equation of the tangent is y-f (x1)

  2. Different methods of solving equations compared. From the Excel tables of each method, we ...

    0.00977173 0.68750000 -0.00091797 0.70312500 0.00791229 0.69531250 0.00327038 0.00441513 0.68750000 -0.00091797 0.69531250 0.00327038 0.69140625 0.00112058 0.00209417 0.68750000 -0.00091797 0.69140625 0.00112058 0.68945313 0.00008753 0.00101928 0.68750000 -0.00091797 0.68945313 0.00008753 0.68847656 -0.00041864 0.00050275 0.68847656 -0.00041864 0.68945313 0.00008753 0.68896484 -0.00016641 0.00025309 0.68896484 -0.00016641 0.68945313 0.00008753 0.68920898 -0.00003965 0.00012697 0.68920898 -0.00003965 0.68945313 0.00008753 0.68933105 0.00002389 0.00006359

  1. The method I am going to use to solve x−3x-1=0 is the Change ...

    The graph of this function and the calculations are below: I want the root that the arrow is pointing ,the root lies between x=0 and x=1. x f(x) 0 0.1 0.1 0.0715 0.2 0.016 0.3 -0.0425 The root is between x=0.2 and x=0.3, and I am going to zoom the graph in to see I am correct or not.

  2. The Gradient Fraction

    If you round the values up and down to their lowest terms and highest terms, they will equal to the following: x=2: 7.82 (round up to 8) the 2 has been multiplied by 4. x=3: 12.41 (round down to 12)

  1. decimal search

    of where the root lies. Then new values of x are obtained by taking increments of 0.01 within the second interval, these values are again substituted into the f(x) until there is a change of sign, this will give an even closer interval of where the root lies.

  2. maths pure

    -0.04 -0.03 -0.01 0.003 The above calculations show us that the root lies in the interval [-1.078, -1.077]. From this we can conclude that the root to f(x) = 4x3+5 is ?1.0775 +/- 0.0005. Error Bounds The change of sign method automatically provide bounds, the two ends of the interval,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work