• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

science resistance gcse

Extracts from this document...


Concluding coursework

How I supported my evidence to support my hypotheses

In this project I had 2 hypotheses that I had to try and prove. The first was boys are taller than girls and the second hypothesis was the taller you are the bigger feet you have. I have proved both these hypotheses are true. My hypotheses are supported by graphs and discussions to show what the graphs are about and how they support my hypothesis. I have interpreted my findings so it is easily seen what the graph is trying to say and how it effects my hypothesis, if it supports my hypothesis or not. The interpretations go into more detail about what the graph is trying to tell you.

Improvements I could make on my coursework

I could of improved on my project by having a bigger sample, which would of made even more accurate results in the graphs and help support my hypotheses even more accurately. Other improvement I could of made was to investigate more hypotheses which would of meant more calculations which would show I no how to do more advance mathematics.

...read more.


Weaknesses of my coursework

The weaknesses in my coursework were the limitations that I had. Like the sample size had to be between 30 and 40 people which is not a very big sample size with might of made my results a little inaccurate instead if I had a bigger sample size I could have been a lot more accurate. Another limitation was the fact I only could have 2 hypotheses, if I used more than 2 hypotheses I could of proved a lot more about the selected population. Time was a big limitation in this project that meant we had to have a small sample size so we could get results from it quickly. If we had more time we could have had a bigger sample size and made the project more accurate. The sample used was only from one year in one school, if we used a different year in a different school the results could have been different this could If we looked at other students in other years or in different areas that could of helped to support the hypotheses more strongly.

...read more.


There is one way that I could have been more accurate with my results and that would be to have a bigger sample size. This would make my results more accurate as it would be taking results of a lot more people which means its more accurate in saying what it would be like for a large sum of people but if you have a small sample size the results may not reflect the large sum of people which makes the sample inaccurate. I think the population having information about kids from other years and schools to make it a more general sample to be more accurate. The way the sample could have been better is if it was bigger to gain more accurate results

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. Statistics coursework

    Male 103 4 4 4 12 7 Male 100 4 4 4 12 7 Male 107 5 5 5 15 7 Male 101 4 4 4 12 7 Male 88 3 3 3 9 7 Male 105 4 5 5 14 7 Male 100 4 4 4 12 7 Male

  2. Maths GCSE Statistics Coursework

    1.69 68 F 2.00 69 F 2.00 74 F 1.45 78 F 1.63 79 F 1.65 82 M 1.70 84 F 1.28 85 M 1.75 87 F 1.20 93 F 1.50 101 F 1.45 103 M 1.24 110 M 1.35 111 F 1.35 116 F 1.10 117 M 1.63 120

  1. Is there a Correlation between GCSE Mathematics and English Literature scores?

    152 5 3 74 5 4 156 1 3 78 1 2 158 0 1 80 6 5 162 6 4 I am now going to plot these results on a Scatter graph so I can easily see whether the data has a Correlation.

  2. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    This is a relative low percentage which means from the mean there doesn't seem to be much error for the line. For the angle the mean is 624.24/33 which equals 18.92%. This means that from the mean you can see that from the year 11 data, they were better at estimating the length of the line.

  1. GCSE Mathematics Coursework: Statistics Project

    Now the number of pupils required from each year group is calculated, the pupils may be selected at random, to create an unbiased sample. To do this, I will use a calculator. Each Year group's data is on a separate Excel worksheet, so it is a question of using the

  2. Estimating the length of the line and the size of the angle

    This is stratified sampling. Below is a table showing how I have worked this out. Set No. Of Pupils Total No. Of Pupils (in yr 11) Total No. Of Pupils being asked No. Of Pupils being asked 1 30 120 20 =(B2/C2)*D2 2 29 120 20 =(B3/C3)*D3 3 25 120

  1. I am investigating how well people estimate the length of a line and the ...

    20% of 110= 22. I will therefore take 22 samples. Estimate Error % error 32 1 3 30 3 9 25 8 24 45 12 36 45 12 36 45 12 36 45 12 36 45 12 36 45

  2. Comparative Newspaper Project

    My method ensures that the same numbers of sentences are counted, and the randomness ensues fairness amongst which articles and adverts are looked at, and which are not. Calculating Distribution Measurements: See separate sheet - Distribution for Telegraph See separate sheet - Distribution for Sun Mean (Telegraph): =21.5 Mean (Sun):

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work