• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sequences and series investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sequences and series investigation By Neil

In this investigation I have been asked to find out how many squares
would be needed to make up a certain pattern according to its sequence.
The pattern is shown on the front page. In this investigation I
hope to find a formula which could be used to find out the number
of squares needed to build the pattern at any sequential position.
Firstly I will break the problem down into simple steps to begin
with and go into more detail to explain my solutions. I will illustrate
fully any methods I should use and explain how I applied them to
this certain problem. I will firstly carry out this experiment on
a 2D pattern and then extend my investigation to 3D.


The Number of Squares in Each Sequence


I have achieved the following information by drawing out the pattern and extending upon it.

Seq. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. Of cubes 1 5 13 25 41 61 85 113




I am going to use this next method to see if I can work out some sort of pattern:



Sequence Calculations Answer
1 =1 1
2 2(1)+3 5
3 2(1+3)+5 13
4 2(1+3+5)+7 25
5 2(1+3+5+7)+9 41
6 2(1+3+5+7+9)+11 61
7 2(1+3+5+7+9+11)+13 85
8 2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13)+15 113
9 2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13+15) +17 145




What I am doing above is shown with the aid of a diagram below;

If we take sequence 3:

2(1+3)+5=13

2(1 squares)
2(3 squares)
1(5 squares)

The Patterns I Have Noticied in Carrying Out the Previous Method


I have now carried out ny first investigation into the pattern and
have seen a number of different patterns.

Firstly I can see that the number of squares in each pattern is an odd number.

...read more.

Middle


3. 18 -5
4. = 13
The formula when applied to sequence 3 appears to be
successful.

Sequence 5:
1. 2(52) - 10 + 1
2. 2(25) - 10 + 1
3. 50 - 10 + 1
4. 50 - 9
5. = 41
Successful

Sequence 6:
1. 2(6
2) - 12 + 1
2. 2(36) - 12 +1
3. 72 - 12 + 1
4. 72 - 11
5. = 61
Successful

Sequence 8:
1. 2(8
2) - 16 + 1
2. 2(64) - 16 + 1
3. 128 - 16 + 1
4. 128 - 15 5. = 113
Successful
The formula I found seems to be successful as I have shown on the
previous page. I will now use the formula to find the number of squares in a higher sequence.

So now I wil use the formula 2n
2 - 2n + 1 to try and find
the number of squares contained in sequence 20.

Sequence 20:

2 (20
2) - 40 + 1
2(400) - 40 + 1
800 - 40 + 1
800 - 49
= 761

Instead of illustrating the pattern I am going to use the method
I used at the start of this piece of coursework. The method in which
Iused to look for any patterns in the sequences. I will use this
to prove the number of squares given by the equation is correct.
As shown below:

2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13+15+17+19+21+23+25+27+29+31+33+35+37) + 39 = 761

I feel this proves the equation fully.




Using the Difference Method to Find an Equation to Establish
the Number of Squares in a 3D Version of the Pattern



Pos.in seq. 0 1 2 3 4 5
No.of squar. -1 1 7 25 63 129
1st differ. 2 6 18 38 66
2nd differ. 4 12 20 28 36
3rd differ. 8 8 8 8



So therefore we get the equation;
anƒ + bn
2 + cn + d

We already know the values of 'n' (position in sequence) in the
equation so now we have to find out the values of a, b, c, and d.

If n = 0 then d = -1 and if n = 1 then d = 1

I can now get rid of d from the equation to make it easier to find
...read more.

Conclusion


was a quadratic. This can be proven through the fact that the 2nd
difference was a constant, a necessary element of any quadratic
and also the fact that the first value has to be squared. This can
also be proved by illustrating the equation on the graph, creating a curve.
I have also established that the top triangular half of the 2D pattern
always turns out to be a square number.
If we now look at the 3D pattern, the equation I achieved for it
has turned out to a cubic equation. This can be proven through the
constant, again a necessary characteristic of any cubic equation
and also the fact that its 1st value must be cubed and its second
squared. If we drew a graph we would get a ccurved graph in which
the line falls steeply, levels off and then falls again.
The Differentiation Method developed by Jean Holderness played a
very important role in this investigation. It helped us to gain
knowledge of any pattern and anything that would help in the invetigation,
giving us our constant, but most importantly it gave us the equation
on which to base our solutions.

It was:
an2 + bn + c

This proved very helpful.

To find our equation we then substituted in different values which
we could find in our differentiation table.

I have concluded that both the equations proved to be very successful.
Therefore the equations are:

For the 2D pattern the equation is;
2n
2 - 2n + 1

For the 3D pattern the equation is;
_(nƒ) - 2n
2 + 2Y(n) - 1

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. 2D and 3D Sequences Project Plan of Investigation

    We then take the summation (å) of these odd numbers and multiply them by two. After doing this we add on the next consecutive odd number to the doubled total. I have also noticied something through the drawings I have made of the patterns.

  2. Sequence & Series

    with 25 terms are 29 and 179. Find the sum of the series and the common difference. a=29, l=179 and n=25, therefore. Rearranging the formula to make d the subject, we obtain. 9. The sum of the first four terms of an A.P. is twice the 5th term.

  1. The open box problem

    11.5 0 This table shows that the maximum volume lies between 3.5 and 4.5 so I will now draw another table that will take a closer look at it. X 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 V 1011.5 1016.1 1019.572 1022.048 1023.516 1024 1023.524 1022.112

  2. Numerical Solutions of Equations.

    or x = -1.2146 ?0.00005. When x = (-1.2146 + 0.00005) = -1.21455, y = 7.73 x 10-4 (positive) When x = (-1.2146 - 0.00005) = -1.21465, y = -1.54 x 10-5 (negative) This method is demonstrated graphically below. The pink lines show the Newton-Raphson iteration process.

  1. Triminoes Investigation

    The only numbers used on the card are 0, 1, and 2. Trimino For 0, 1, 2 Largest Number 2 Number of cards 10 Sum of the cards 30 These are there results for 0, 1, 2 but I have to find out about future numbers until 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  2. 2D and 3D Sequences Project

    Firstly I can see that the number of squares in each pattern is an odd number. Secondly I can see that the number of squares in the pattern can be found out by taking the odd numbers from 1 onwards and adding them up (according to the sequence).

  1. Mathematical Investigation

    Based on the observation that varying values of "a" only changes the amplitude, therefore it can be easily conjectured that the waves are stretched vertically, while the X-intercepts remain the same, according to |a|. Part II Investigate the graphs of y=sin (b�x)

  2. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    I only got its range, -0.66514 < root of the equation used < -0.66513. So, I decide to get their error bound by: Average of the upper and lower error bound = = Upper Error Bound = Lower Error Bound = The Error Bound of the root of this equation

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work