• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Solve the equation: X3- 5X-5 = 0. This equation cannot be factorised nor solved algebraically therefore it must be solved through interval bisection.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Interval Bisection.

## Solve the equation:  X3– 5X-5 = 0. This equation cannot be factorised nor solved algebraically therefore it must be solved through interval bisection.

To calculate the approximate position of the roots and the number of roots I used Omnigraph to sketch the graph (below shows where the graph crosses the x-axis).

## This is the root I want to find and shows how the solution lies between 2.6 and 2.7  [f (X) = X3 – 5X - 5]

X0 = 2.6   f (X0) =  -0.424

X1 = 2.7   f (X1) = + 1.183

As f(X0)< 0 and f(X1) > 0 it shows that the solution must lie between X0 and X1, thus creating an error bound  2.6 < X < 2.7.

In order to reduce the error bound and ultimately find the solution I set-up a table of values for  X and f(X) using Excel.

Middle

0.001199

1

2.62734375

11

2.6273926

0.0004319

1

2.62734375

12

2.6273682

4.837E-05

1

2.62734375

13

2.627356

-0.000143

-1

2.62736816

14

2.6273621

-4.75E-05

-1

2.62736816

15

2.6273651

4.335E-07

1

2.62736206

16

2.6273636

-2.35E-05

-1

2.62736511

After 16 literations it gives the answer of 2.627 to 3 d.p or 2.627 +/- 0.0005. Therefore it can be said that that 2.627<X<2.628.

• ## As the sign of (X) when its equal to 2.627 is negative

i.e. 2.627 3 – 5*2.627  - 5 =  -0.00573

• And the sign of (X) when it equals 2.628 is positive

i.e. 2.628 3 – 5*2.628  - 5 =  -0.00998

To give an example of an equation that cannot be solved using this method is an equation that follows two main points:

1. It must be an equation that just touches the x-axis but doesn’t cross the axis i.e. X4 (shown on omnigraph below). 1. Must not touch the x-axis at the origin- therefore the graph of X4 needs to be ‘shifted’ either left or right i.e. (X-7)4   [shown below on omnigraph]. Conclusion

An example of this is: X3-3X2+X+1 = 0. The diagram below shows that the gradient of the curve X3-3X2+X+1 = 0 although is not too steep to allow the Newton Raphson method to calculate the value of the root but highlights how the solution lies close to a maximum point on the graph. It is also clear that by using excel to create a spread sheet, as used to calculate the solution for: 2X4- X3 + 3X2-2 = 0, shows how the tangent and therefore the answer moves further away and doesn’t give a correct solution.

 Newton raphson n X(n) 0 0.5 1 1.2 2 0.991489 3 1.000001 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1.  5 star(s)

I shall try and investigate this. 3x� x y second value x second value y gradient 4 48 4.1 50.43 24.6 4 48 4.01 48.2403 24.06 4 48 4.001 48.024003 24.006 3 27 3.1 28.83 18.6 3 27 3.01 27.1803 18.06 3 27 3.001 27.018003 18.006 2 12 2.1 13.23

2. ## Best shape for gutter and further alegbra - using Excel to solve some mathematical ...

By using algebra I can find ? at which the optimum capacity exists. Angle to give Optimum capacity; =w2 sin ? = 0 Cos ? = 0 ? = 90� Semi-Circular cross-section l = ? x r l = ?

1. ## Finding the root of an equation

Because of the nature of the answer when given to five significant figures, the amount of error is +0.000005.

2. -128 -54 -16 -2 0 2 16 54 128 y -128 -54 -16 -2 0 2 16 54 128 'y=2x3' solved by the 'Increment Method' This is another cubic graph, but it is more complex than 'y=x3' Graph on next page Results x Gradient 1 6.06 2 24 3 54

1. ## maths pure

For this particular rearrangement, g(x)= 3?(3x+5): g?(x) = (3x+5)-2/3 = 1/(3x+5)-2/3 With x0 = 2 g?(2) =0.202 and because? ?g?(2) ?< 1, the sequence converges. Situation where Iteration Fails to Converge to required root. The equation x3-3x-5=0 can be rearranged so that x = (x3-5)/3.

2. ## In this coursework I will be looking at equations that cannot be solved algebraically

between the integer bounds [2, 3], and it seems there may be roots between [5, 6] but it is not clear. Using decimal search, I have calculated the integer values for x from [2, 6] x y 2 -6.24 3 1.98 4 2.101 5 0.1214 6 2.042 This table shows

1. ## Investigate the relationships between the lengths of the 3 sides of the right angled ...

6 + b = 8 B = - 6 B = 2 Substitute A =2 and B = 2 into equation 1. I am doing this to find what C is worth. A + B + C = 4 2 + 2 + C = 4 4 + C = 4 C = 0 F (n)

2. ## Examining, analysing and comparing three different ways in which to find the roots to ...

I then took this a stage further, and did the decimal search to 2 decimal places. The results were: 4.1 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.2 -3.58 -3.22 -2.87 -2.51 -2.14 -1.78 -1.41 -1.04 -0.67 -0.29 0.09 The result here was an interval between [4.19, 4.2], and so I then went further, to 3 decimal places. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 