• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matt Coles        Centre Number – 40120        Candidate Number - 3135

Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

For my coursework, I am going to solve equations that cannot be solved analytically. This is when the equation would have been solved by using the quadratic formula, completing the square or by factorising it. The equations used will be solved numerically and there are three methods that I will be using:

  • The Change of Sign method
  • The Newton-Raphson method
  • The Rearrangement method

Method 1: The Change of Sign Method

The first method that I will be using is the Change of Sign method. The equation that I will be solving is y=x3+3x2-2x-1. To do this, I will be drawing the function of                 f(x)=x3+3x2-2x-1.

Root α

Root β

Root γ

To solve this equation using the Change of Sign method, I will be using the Decimal Search on Microsoft Excel.Firstly, I started by entering the equation into Autograph to get a sketch of the graph.

...read more.

Middle

After that, I moved in closer, entering -3.5 to -3.49 (in 0.001’s) with the formula in the column next to it. This gave me the answer as to where the change of sign was – between -3.491 and -3.49.

Finally, I entered the numbers between -3.491 and -3.49 (in 0.0001’s) into Excel. This showed me that the change of sign was between         -3.4909 and -3.4908.

This is now up to 5 sig.fig. meaning that I have found the answer with the error bounds on the left hand side. The error bounds show that this works as there is a change of sign.

FAILURES

This method fails in two ways – when there is a repeated root or there are two roots within consecutive integers. To show how this method fails, I am using the equation x3+x2-5x+3=0. To do this, I will be drawing the function of f(x)= x3+x2-5x+3.

Method 2: The Newton-Raphson Method

Root α

Root β

...read more.

Conclusion

Root β. The red line is the function of f(x)=x3-7x2+x+3 and the blue lines are the sliding tangents.The third root I have chosen to use is Root γ. Below is the Excel spread sheet with f(xn) and its derivative, f’(x) shown.

Root γ

On the left is the equation that shows the sliding tangent of the Newton-Raphson Method in a graphical form forRoot y. The red line is the function of f(x)=x3-7x2+x+3 and the blue lines are the sliding tangents.  Root γ = 2.4023 (5 sig.fig.).This root has error bounds

FAILURES

y=2x3-3x2-6x+4

Root γ

Method 3: The Rearrangement Method

The third method that I am using is the Rearrangement Method. For this method, I will be using a different function to the other two. The equation I will be using for the Rearrangement method is y=x3+2x2-2x-2. This means that the function I will be using is f(x)= x3+2x2-2x-2.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    I will need to try this, however, with 2 more cases, to find a respective pattern between all of them. With the next method, I shall use solely the table/increment method to find respective gradients. It is perhaps not a preferred method to algebraic proof.

  2. Best shape for gutter and further alegbra - using Excel to solve some mathematical ...

    The mode can be seen from the bar chart. As the numbers in the frequency column change the pupils will be able to see the mean being recalculated and the bar chart adjusting itself to the new values.

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    the upper bounds and lower are two opposite signs the root must lie within the range of values of the interval. As K varies As we proved above, if K = 1 the root is 0.479731007. However what if K, was 2, 3 etc, could a pattern be distinguished, the

  2. Numerical solutions of equations

    the other two methods- the Decimal Search method and the Newton-Raphson method. I will start off with the Decimal Search method. From the graph 0=x5+4x2-2, I can see that the root lies between x = 0.5 and x = 1 x f(x)

  1. Mathematical equations can be solved in many ways; however some equations cannot be solved ...

    Therefore, at the root, 0<g'(x) <1 and so the method is successful. From the table we can see that two values match to 5 significant figures. U7 and U8 agree to 5 significant figures giving a value of -3.4115.

  2. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

    -9.36675E-07 1.269758 1.26976 -9.36675E-07 3.80883E-06 1.269759 1.43609E-06 This is a bisection failure. As the graph shows, we can't solve the other roots. We can only find one root, so the failure exists. Newton-Raphson Method: First of all, I am trying to estimate the root, and I start to work with tangents to find a more accurate estimation.

  1. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

    bound is 2.8 and the function of the upper bound is 1.74() and they have no sign change due to it has an asymptote between 1 and 2 therefore there is no sign change and this method will fail when it is not continuous function.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    At last, I can see that Newton Raphson converges to a value near to -3.5269. Error Bounds We need to use the change of sign method to trap the root between two solution bounds I evaluate f(-3.52695) and f(-3.52685): f(-3.52685)=-0.00051 f(-3.52695)=0.000193 This change of sign shows that the root must be between these two values.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work