• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matt Coles Centre Number â 40120 Candidate Number - 3135 Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods For my coursework, I am going to solve equations that cannot be solved analytically. This is when the equation would have been solved by using the quadratic formula, completing the square or by factorising it. The equations used will be solved numerically and there are three methods that I will be using: 1. The Change of Sign method 2. The Newton-Raphson method 3. The Rearrangement method Method 1: The Change of Sign Method The first method that I will be using is the Change of Sign method. The equation that I will be solving is y=x3+3x2-2x-1. To do this, I will be drawing the function of f(x)= x3+3x2-2x-1. Root α Root β Root γ To solve this equation using the Change of Sign method, I will be using the Decimal Search on Microsoft Excel.Firstly, I started by entering the equation into Autograph to get a sketch of the graph. ...read more.

Middle

After that, I moved in closer, entering -3.5 to -3.49 (in 0.001âs) with the formula in the column next to it. This gave me the answer as to where the change of sign was â between -3.491 and -3.49. Finally, I entered the numbers between -3.491 and -3.49 (in 0.0001âs) into Excel. This showed me that the change of sign was between -3.4909 and -3.4908. This is now up to 5 sig.fig. meaning that I have found the answer with the error bounds on the left hand side. The error bounds show that this works as there is a change of sign. FAILURES This method fails in two ways â when there is a repeated root or there are two roots within consecutive integers. To show how this method fails, I am using the equation x3+x2-5x+3=0. To do this, I will be drawing the function of f(x)= x3+x2-5x+3. ...read more.

Conclusion

and its derivative, fâ(x) shown. Root β On the left is the equation that shows the sliding tangent of the Newton-Raphson Method in a graphical form for Root β. The red line is the function of f(x)=x3-7x2+x+3 and the blue lines are the sliding tangents. The third root I have chosen to use is Root γ. Below is the Excel spread sheet with f(xn) and its derivative, fâ(x) shown. Root γ On the left is the equation that shows the sliding tangent of the Newton-Raphson Method in a graphical form for Root y. The red line is the function of f(x)=x3-7x2+x+3 and the blue lines are the sliding tangents. Root γ = 2.4023 (5 sig.fig.).This root has error bounds FAILURES y=2x3-3x2-6x+4 Root γ Method 3: The Rearrangement Method The third method that I am using is the Rearrangement Method. For this method, I will be using a different function to the other two. The equation I will be using for the Rearrangement method is y=x3+2x2-2x-2. This means that the function I will be using is f(x)= x3+2x2-2x-2. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    As an example I have used to demonstrate it is the f(x) = x5 + 6x2 - x + 4 Below is how the graph looks like : When I re arrange the equation in the form of x= g(x), it turns out to be this: When I plot this

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    - x (x+h) - x 2(x²+ 2hx + h²) - 2x² + 3(x5 + 5x4h + 10x³h² + 10x²h² + 5xh4 +h5) - 3x5 h h = 2x² + 4hx + 2h² - 2x² + 3x^5 + 15x4(h) + 30x³h² + 30x²h² + 15xh4 +h5 - 3x5 h h = (4x + 2h)

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    Therefore, even the best consumption functions, which discussed above should be used with care. Abstract The project has attempted to Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy and explain economic theories by using statistical techniques. The first part of the project provides a brief introduction about the importance of consumption prediction in the economy and aims of this project.

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    is: As k-> ? then ? -> 0 In other words as the value of K increases, the value of ?(the root) decreases. The graph appears to have some form of geometric progression if we look at the graph. In order for it to be a geometric progression it must have a common multiple.

  1. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

    And also I am impressed how they work out the roots. However, there are differences in the speed of convergence and the ease of use. Therefore, I am going to compare three methods how they work. Afterwards, I am going to compare the speed of convergence and ease of use with available hardware and software.

  2. Analyse the use of three methods which are called the: change of sign, Newton-Raphson ...

    we knew the region of the root, otherwise it would have taken 10 repetitions. Every time the method is repeated the root becomes accurate to another decimal place. Therefore the convergence is linear, of magnitude 10. After n iterations the root can be said to be: a ± 5x10-n (where

  1. C3 Coursework: Numerical Methods

    His is because as with like the Change of Sign method it takes many calculations, in the case of x=g(x), iterations, to find the roots. The fast numerical method appears to be the Newton Raphson method; this is because it takes the fewest number of iterations to find a root.

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    At last, I can see that Newton Raphson converges to a value near to -3.5269. Error Bounds We need to use the change of sign method to trap the root between two solution bounds I evaluate f(-3.52695) and f(-3.52685): f(-3.52685)=-0.00051 f(-3.52695)=0.000193 This change of sign shows that the root must be between these two values.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work