• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Statistical Analysis of a Survey concerning A "Monorail"

Extracts from this document...


James Perry

Monorail Coursework

For this piece of coursework I am going analyse an article from The Southampton Guardian. The article has the heading “ You throw out monorail idea”. It tells us about a recent survey the paper had done and shows the results of it.

The survey asked people to write into the newspaper and give their views on the monorail. This survey was not very successful as it only attracted 48 replies. In my opinion this is a poor sampling method. I believe this as it relied on people replying to the newspaper with there views and not many people would take the time or effort to do this. Only people with very strong views on the situation would do so.

The paper uses the heading “You throw out monorail idea” which suggests that the population of Southampton rejected the idea where as only 48 people replied which is not a big enough sample.

...read more.


Systemic - this type of sampling is often used in production lines. Items are selected at regular intervals, e.g. every 5th house. This again may not guarantee a representative sample but appears to be better than random sampling.

Stratified - this type of sampling is used to ensure that the sample is representative. This means that it ensures it has the right proportions as a population, for example, a population may be divided into social class, this is done by the type of job done. This can also be done asking different age groups which can be done at random. When doing a survey using social class as the stratified sample the range of jobs can be divided up like this. Professional - engineers, scientists, doctors, Intermediate - managers, teachers, Skilled non  manual - clerks cashiers, Skilled manual - lorry drivers, printing workers,

...read more.


Overall I would say the newspaper always set out to show the monorail was not wanted. It seems a bias view of the monorail because of how they describe the results. Even though the newspaper only got 48 replies which is a number significantly lower than even half the population of Southampton, the paper states “You throw out monorail idea”. “You” suggests a whole population not merely 48 people. The sampling technique in my opinion would never get many replies as it relies on people to reply. In today’s society not many people have the time to reply or even can be bothered to reply. Only people with a very strong opinion on the situation would reply.

In conclusion I believe the newspaper provided a bias view on the situation and should have used a better sampling technique which would of provided better and clearer results.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. The mathematical genii apply their Statistical Wizardry to Basketball

    Assumptions that I am making to allow the model to work are that the trials are: * Identical: The factors are exactly the same. This provides a fair test and is a property of the geometric distribution. * Independent: The trials are not affected by the previous trial.

  2. Statistics coursework

    IQ Frequency Cumulative Frequency Percentage of total 60<IQ<70 0 0 0 70<IQ<80 0 0 0 80<IQ<90 4 4 10.53 90<IQ<100 7 11 28.95 100<IQ<110 23 34 89.47 110<IQ<120 4 38 100 120<IQ<130 0 38 100 130<IQ<140 0 38 100 - IQ of boys in year 11 (Table 6)

  1. Probability of Poker Hands

    For example, we can have a flush with spades, diamonds, clubs and hearts. Number of ways to choose cards without restriction: In order to find the probability, we must use the formula P(A)= N(A)/N(S), where N(A) is the number of outcomes in which even A can occur and N(S)

  2. Statistics: Survey of Beijing and China during the SARS storm

    Until the anaphase, the factor moves northward to Beijing. It is the reason Beijing becomes the biggest disaster area. March and April are not the climax months of the SARS storm. But I predict it has a normal distribution of death number.

  1. Data Analysis of American House Price

    As table 4 shows the proportion of houses with a pool are in ascending order with the number of township: township 1 has the lowest percentage and township 5 has the highest. This could be a coincidence. However, on the overall distribution, township 4 has the highest percentage of houses

  2. &amp;quot;The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    For the year 9 line estimates, was 0.99, which means that the results are very compact compared to the mean, which shows that many pupils estimated very close to the mean, showing that the year 9's were better at estimating the line's length.

  1. Identifying Relationships -Introduction to Statistical Inference.

    group of the total sample to be replicated in each of the hotel types. Accepts package tours * Type of Hotel Crosstabulation Type of Hotel Total Class 1 Luxury Class 2 Medium Class 3 Basic Class 4 B and B Accepts package tours Yes Count 5 2 14 25 46 % within Type of Hotel 71.4% (51.4%)

  2. maths coursework sampling

    in the table that encloses information on year 10 and year 7 of the data, one of the student of year 7 (student 88) has given an estimate of area F as 1,000,000, which is an impossible figure. 2. In many cases, incorrect information is not recorded, but instead wrong data is provided to give people collecting the information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work