• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Comparison of two newspaper responses to the aftermath of September the eleventh.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lucy Emily Murphy Language: Media English Coursework A Comparison of two newspaper responses to the aftermath of September the eleventh. September the 11th is a date that will stick in our minds forever. The media response to the attacks was uncontainable and the news of the attacks spread around the world in a matter of minutes. After the attacks George Bush started to suggest attacking Afghanistan, and he started preparing the allied forces. The media started responding with headlines describing the attacks as an 'Apocolypse' and also using words like 'evil.' The attacks triggered a response that had had never been seen before in mankind. I will examine two approaches to the attacking of Afghanistan I will compare the articles "Americans want action. And they're right" written by Harold Evans and the article "How can the U.S bomb this tragic people" by Robert Fisk. In the headline "Americans want action. And they're right", Harold Evans is suggesting that it is morally correct to bomb the Afghanistan's and that it should be done because of the attacks on New York city. ...read more.

Middle

In the picture that is juxtaposed with the headline "How can the U.S bomb this tragic people" there is a sense of war and suffering in everyday life. This photograph suggests that if America did attack, the country would have no means of protection. The photograph is set with two young children climbing on an old army tank, this is suggesting that the apparatus of war have become absorbed into the landscape and has become part of every day life. In the area surrounding the photograph the land is decaying and is destroyed the country is not technologically advanced and that it would not take a lot for America to destroy the entire country. They certainly would not put up a strong competition for the Americans. In both headlines there are two conflicting views as to what to do about Afghanistan. They are both confident and sure as to what they ought to do. For example the headline "and they're right" suggests that he believes that only his view is correct. ...read more.

Conclusion

lot it is also an offensive term that you would remember because the only way to say the phrase 'Demented fanatics' is in a harsh tone of voice. Many people would argue for bombing Afghanistan and many would argue against. There are a lot of conflicting views as to what should be done about either bombing Afghanistan or not. Harold Evans and Robert Fisk have written down their conflicting beliefs trying to get the country to believe what they do, and they have come to their own decisions. I have concluded that the headlines on these particular articles show what the writer believes at the beginning of the article with clear self-explanatory headlines. I have also explained the use of language written down in order to explain clearly what both the writers believe. My comparison of the two articles proves that not only people agreed with the bombing of Afghanistan they also thought it was the morally correct thing to do, however there were a few minority of people that thought it was wrong to bomb a country with such a poor defence mechanism as Afghanistan. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Newspapers & Magazines section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Newspapers & Magazines essays

  1. Newspaper Comparison.

    Also, unlike the other articles, Account A begins by quoting an authoritative source (the governor of Puerto Rico) validating the possibility of an arson attack on the hotel. Many key facts regarding the fire are summarised in the this opening paragraph the hotel is located as the "beachfront" in "San Juan" (the capital)

  2. Textual Analysis and Comparison

    in a balanced viewpoint, giving a better representation of views and is more accurate to the intention of the EU. The article also has a further representation of views surrounding the issue and invites a number of leading authorities to give their opinion on the matter such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

  1. English Language Article Comparison

    This straight away says something about the way that The Express deals with news stories and The Sun, even though they are both tabloids. In fact the similarities between these articles (even though one is in a tabloid and one in a broadsheet)

  2. Magazine Reveiw and Comparison

    follow gossip and are interested with celebrity news. Also the articles in 'OK!' magazine are different then the articles in 'Now' magazine. This shows the different audiences the magazines are focused on. The language in 'Now' is informal. "Liz: Brand now bod" Like in 'OK!'

  1. Newspaper Comparison

    A difference between the front pages is that the Daily Mail has two pictures whereas the Daily Star has none. The two pictures are of arrested footballers and they are both looking towards the text in the centre, which invites people to read it.

  2. Analyse the Sun's Newspaper leading article on the day after the terrorist attack on ...

    This heading is also exaggerated to creating drama and excitement to stimulate the interest of the reader. Below the sub heading in a picture of some of the people caught up in the accident. This is eye catching and is reinforcing what is being said in the text.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work