• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Michael Moore make his arguments in 'Bowling for Columbine'

Extracts from this document...


How does Michael Moore make his arguments in 'Bowling for Columbine'? The documentary 'Bowling for Columbine' questions the right in America for owning guns. Michael Moore the director puts his arguments into this bias documentary by using various techniques including vox pops, humour, sarcasm, interviews, irony, music, dramatic effects and parallelism to capture the interest of viewers. Bowling for Columbine is about a gun shooting that occurred in America April 20th 1999 when two students in Columbine high School in Littleton Colorado killed 12 classmates and a teacher. These two students fired over 900 bullets and injured many. Bowling for Columbine is an insight of America's society shaken by fear and inequality. Michael Moore uses a range of tactics by making the viewers question gun ownership including parallelism, interviews, music and irony. Michael uses this to manipulate viewers into thinking his arguments is correct. ...read more.


giving Heston the impression Michael is one of them and that that he supports him. Once Michael has won over Heston's trust, Michael asks him tough questions. Michael interviews Charlton Heston and asks why there are so many gun deaths in America. Heston replies by saying it's because of Americas violent history but Michael makes a good counter argument saying that other parts have had violent history like Nazi Germany and the Japanese invasion in China. Michael shows a montage of deaths and bad things that have happened while music plays in the background 'It's a wonderful world' and this gives the viewers support Michaels view and think that gun ownership is wrong and shows the contrast between visuals and sound. This shows the irony that other countries also have brutal histories. Who was to blame for the columbine shooting? Many Americans blamed Marilyn Manson because Marilyn was a morbid singer. ...read more.


Clinton contradicts himself saying America should reduce violence just after the Columbine shooting. This shows America is hypocritical because on April 20th 1999, the American government dropped bombs on schools and hospitals killing hundreds and just one hour later, the Columbine shooting occurred, this suggests Americans are self-centred because 13 people died in the Columbine shootings whereas the American government dropped bombs killing hundreds. Michael shows that Clinton is promoting violence and peace making the viewers feels that Clinton is hypocritical. After the Columbine shootings an uproar of debate came to if Americans should own guns but throughout this documentary, Michael doesn't mention gun responsibility and safety. Michael successfully influences the viewers into his views and makes us question the rights of Americans owning guns. I think Manson's view is the most persuasive and that Michael uses a good range of tactics to win viewers over but then again he only helps his views of the argument, making this documentary not very reliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Television section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Television essays

  1. Francesco O'Leary was born in Kilmarnock Scotland on April the 10th 1901

    O'Leary's Colleague's .the idea of portable energy came in useful to O'Leary so he thought of something that would need this. And it was at the university that he thought of a camera. Where you could take pictures instead of having portraits done.

  2. Television Violence and the Effects on Children

    The chairman of the Canadian Radio-Television Telecommunications Commission has described the debate as trying to find a balance between "rights of artists and entrepreneurs and adult viewers to freedom of expression, and the rights of children to be protected from truly harmful violence."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work