• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The two articles for comparison are Google will not remove anti-Islam film from YouTube following White House request for review ,published on September 15th, 2012 from FoxNews.com, and from CTVnews.ca, published September 16th

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Media Study A Comparitive Analysis Chelsey Fonger 200321736 Dr. F Volker Greifenhagen RLST 100 October 4th, 2012 Comparative Media Analysis Those in the business of media publishing have an extremely delicate job. No matter what you publish, someone will agree, while others will read in disgust, or simply not care. Writers for newspapers and news outlets have a densely diverse crowd of people to please, all wanting to hear about the latest drama, violence and worldly decisions happening in their home towns, and around the globe, while touching on certain topics, and staying clear of others. Religion is often a touchy subject when being presented to the public eye. If we lived in a world of nontheistic readers, journalists would have a much easier job, but unfortunately, the human race is chalk full of opinionated people, who have their own pre-set ideas about religion in all its forms. In comparing these pieces of journalism we can separate words of judgement and true fact, revealing the opinionated societies of the world. The two articles up for comparison are titled ?Google will not remove anti-Islam film from YouTube following White House request for review? ,published on September 15th, 2012 from FoxNews.com, and from CTVnews.ca, the very same story was published September 16th, titled ?Google refuses to take down anti-Muslim clip?. ...read more.

Middle

The situation being explained is defined at a ?refusal? by some parts, resulting in ?restrictions? for others, which again gives a negative outlook on the rest of the article to follow. Unlike the first article, the opening in this piece does not use specific names of countries being restricted; it instead uses the clever word play of ?certain countries?, to avoid offending anyone. The violence that has resulted because of Google?s choices is not exactly defined in the title or opening, but is instead foreshadowed by the use of words like ?restricting? and ?anti-Muslim?, which both suggest a negative vibe, that will be explained later in the article. Language The language used in both articles is extremely negative, with the words ?refuses?, ?raging?, and ?restricted? being repeated several times. These words are just the tip of the ice berg that, which reveals more use of strong, harsh words and sentences regarding YouTube?s ?standards? and ?guidelines? for uploading videos. There are not so much stereotypes made in either article, but more so generalizations of groups of people and their actions. As we have previously discussed, using the term ?Middle East? to describe the Muslim citizens in Egypt, India, Libya and surrounding countries is neither correct or polite. ...read more.

Conclusion

The constraints on the foxnews.com article followed these guidelines. The writer was very opinionated, and made sure to place all comments made by American political figures in a positive light. These constraints somewhat revolved around the political party of the United States, and Google?s opinions on the matter. As far as economic restraints go, no matter which way the story is sold, controversy will be made, and the story will sell, so there was not much of a constraint in that area. Impact The coverage from these two articles has mixed attitudes towards religion. They avoid the topic of religion, while making sure that it is seen as a serious subject. The fact that there is no ?religious? section on any of these news sites even more expresses the awkwardness publishers feel when talking about the subject of religion and religious controversies and scandals. The story itself suggests that competing religions bring nothing but problems, and while most religions are about keeping the peace and worshiping God?s will, the people of these articles are not acting peaceful, and are creating a false illusion of what religion really is, which is highlighted in news media articles like these two. Religion is not supposed to be about competing to be superior and engaging in violence, yet a reader would assume so after reading pieces like these. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Internet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Internet essays

  1. In assessing the competitive position of a large online trader, we would use the ...

    So it would limit Amazon's choice of financing and ability to expand the business. No Touching Experience Although Amazon would provide distinct searching and shopping experience to internet users, it prohibited the touching experience. Unlike retail shop, Amazon's customers would have no physical touch with the products so they could not trial or test them before making purchase decision.

  2. This essay critically discusses the social issue of homelessness and its impact on young ...

    or people sleeping in tents away from campsites who might be homeless but could be tourists, or people sleeping in derelict buildings are not necessarily sleeping rough and that they should not be included unless they are clearly bedded down at the time of the count.

  1. Terrorism is the unconventional use of violence for political gain.

    Terrorists need publicity and, surely, the journalists must be aware of what is the intension of terrorist doing something, the journalist must know what was the purpose of any action and what every carelessly written/said word may lead to. Experts say terrorists have learned to adapt their methods and messages as the media have evolved.

  2. The 3D animation being created is about a house on fire. It consists of ...

    The viewers likely to watch this video are children aged between three and ten. Their intelligence would be low as they are young. They would have knowledge of fire trucks and what fire trucks do so the movie would be entertaining for them.

  1. Evaluation of Two Commercial Multimedia products. oth products are professional animations which have ...

    In this animation user has to get involved in the story as it asks the user to click on different objects. This gives the user some control. Below is the screen shot of scene in which user has been asked to click on the rock to see what is under the rocks.

  2. Does the exposure to violence in the media cause increased levels of aggression and ...

    Reflective of the violent minded society today, regardless if you are on the good team or the bad team, you perceive yourself as the good one and everyone else as enemies to kill. The inclusion of technology such as headsets makes killing people more realistic than killing a computer; it is a person with a voice.

  1. Stop Blaming the Internet. There is an increasing amount of blame being placed on ...

    Males gives incredible statistics which prove that deviance among adults towards children greater than deviance attributed to the electronic media. He says how the Institute for Alternative Media emphasizes, 'the average American child will witness 200,000 acts of [TV] violence' by the time that child graduates from high school"(4).

  2. To what extent can sources published on the internet help historians of crime overcome ...

    computer when you go to view the sources, so the internet is diverse as well as accessible. For example if as a crime historian I wanted to read some old court cases from France, Then instead of having to learn a completely different language to my own I could just

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work