Three or four beheadings into Sleepy Hollow, a harum-scarum take on Washington Irving's venerable tale of love, greed and mysticism in the Hudson Valley, one gets the feeling that perhaps director Tim Burton is working in the wrong film

Authors Avatar

Dan Early

In this issue


Sleepy Hollow

Three or four beheadings into Sleepy Hollow, a harum-scarum take on Washington Irving's venerable tale of love, greed and mysticism in the Hudson Valley, one gets the feeling that perhaps director Tim Burton is working in the wrong film. Piffle to the dozen or so decapitations he eventually oversees here. A movie about the French Revolution would have afforded him the opportunity to behead almost a whole social class. Well, maybe next time. Meanwhile, Burton makes do. What the filmmaker gives up in quantity, he makes up for in devotion to detail. Each artistically rendered lopping-off is more gruesome and terrifying than the last. In every instance, the rolling heads screech to an in your face, center-screen stare; the victim's obscene look of horror confirming the obvious.

Think about it, though: Is perfection in this surgical speciality a worthy pursuit for a director of Mr. Burton's calibre? And more importantly, is the end product worthy of our movie-going time. The short answer to both questions is an unmitigated no. But the pity is, just like Terry Malloy in On The Waterfront, Sleepy Hollow "coulda been sumpin." It "coulda been a contenduh."

Arrogantly dismissing everything but the bare bone basics of the original tale, this rewrite by Andrew Kevin Walker makes the fatal mistake of confusing modernisation for

interpretation. Pandering to what is perceived as the gust populi, he takes the easy way out. It is a short-sighted oversimplification of the artistic process, obviously meant to cash in on the current slice-and-dice craze. But our higher instincts have to believe that a proper reworking of this classic legend that has survived in the national psyche for over 150 years has an essence worth tapping into. That there exists a deep-seated animus, which would not only do the work proud, but, ideally, also find a bigger and better audience than this Philistine version attracts.

Unfortunately, while the risk-taking director has almost always displayed his uniquely bizarre sense of the macabre (Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands), his ruminations here are run of the mill. Though Sleepy Hollow has the trademark hue and trappings of a Burtonesque traipse through the highly imaginative nether world of the mind, the substance beneath the shell doesn't match.

Likewise, something's amiss in the characterisation department. Heretofore, as either director or producer, Mr. Burton has rarely failed to infatuate via his pantheon of ghoulish and ghostly stick figures (The Nightmare Before Christmas) or his darkly drawn cartoonish beings (Batman, Batman Returns). Yet when the screenplay calls for the sort of real humans that populate Washington Irving's semi-mythic saga, he seems at a loss.

In this rendition, when the head count begins soaring in the Sleepy Hollow of 1799, just two days ride north of New York City, Knickerbocker detective Ichabod Crane is sent to find out why. Portrayed by Johnny Depp in an assignment that seems to allude him, the scientific sleuth arrives with all manner of investigatory contraptions. Informing that some of the gumshoeing gizmos are of his own invention, the bright-eyed bloodhound is painted as the spirit of the next century, a rational humanist with a quirky touch of whimsy. A sharp contrast to the superstition-steeped old burghers (all wonderfully cast) who run the village, he is hesitant to believe that Sleepy Hollow's population is being decimated by, of all things, the headless ghost of a Hessian soldier out for revenge. He surmises that the citizenry shares a guilty secret. But what?

Of course, this earliest of American city slickers is in for a country-style education. And along the way, he, er, falls head over heels for Katrina Van Tassel (Christina Ricci), daughter of Baltus Van Tassel (Michael Gambon), the hamlet's wealthiest citizen. As the Dutch damsel is for all intents and purposes betrothed to town heartthrob Brom Van Brunt (Casper Van Dien), this makes for a love triangle which is unenthusiastically mixed in with the greater convolutions at hand.

Join now!

Depp is the outsider, the stranger, the sociologically divergent moral center come to bring reason to the misbehaving folk in the hinterlands, a la Spencer Tracy's one-armed shamus in Bad Day At Black Rock. There is promise. He reminds at first of a young Charlie Chan crossed with a rookie Sherlock Holmes. But when the plot can't decide if it's a gothic romance, a detective tale or a monster movie, Mr. Depp's character sympathetically disintegrates into an equally uncertain entity. As the star of Ed Wood and Donnie Brasco is among this column's favourite young actors, the thespic flub is here noted ...

This is a preview of the whole essay