• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To compare the way three news publications, The Times, The Mirror and Newsweek, an American weekly magazine, reported the same incident, “A Disaster in the Alps”

Extracts from this document...


To compare the way three news publications, The Times, The Mirror and Newsweek, an American weekly magazine, reported the same incident, "A Disaster in the Alps" For this essay, I have been asked to compare three different news reports of the same incident - 'Disaster in the Alps'. On the 3rd of February 1998, a US fighter plane severed the cable of a ski lift in the Italian Alps. A cable car with 20 occupants inside fell to the ground and all were killed. The incident was widely reported in the British and American press, but the three publications I am looking at are; The Mirror, The Times and Newsweek. The Mirror is a tabloid paper. It uses pacy, dramatic language, bold type and pull quotes to report on the incident. The Times is a broadsheet paper. It is known as the establishment newspaper, has a reputation for investigative journalism and uses calm language to report the incident. Newsweek is an American weekly publication. It is in high competition with another American weekly, 'Time', for the highest sales. It downplays the incident as a form of 'anti-Americanism'. Each publication therefore describes the incident in a different way. The Mirror provides facts on the number of people killed and how far they fell. It includes opinions on the height that the plane was flying and interviews people from every angle of the incident - holidaymakers, police, fire and US officials. ...read more.


Words and phrases like 'sliced' and 'ripped apart' also help to do this. The Times reports on the incident in a more controlled manner, but it still shows the horror of the incident. The article provides all the facts without going over the top and does not try to put the blame squarely on the Americans. The article includes all the information that the reader needs for an accurate picture of the incident and the writing is structured so that the reader can fully understand the situation. As The Times is a broadsheet paper the language is also more complex and includes longer sentences. Newsweek's report is very different. The language does not show the horror of the incident, but tries to say that the outcry against low-flying planes is some kind of anti-Americanism. Even the sub-headline says that 'Europe questions America's character'. This all starts to confuse the reader and so does not give an accurate picture of the incident. The words used also try to disagree with the facts of the incident. Words like 'griped' and 'claimed' both suggest that there was nothing wrong and everyone was 'ganging up' against America. The people interviewed in The Mirror's article each give a different perspective on the incident. There are British holidaymakers, who narrowly missed being on the cable car. ...read more.


The Times does not have any American comment, other than the statement by the Pentagon. This means that although the Times' article is largely impartial, it does not give the American view of things. Newsweek's article is weak because it is totally dependent on confusing the reader. If it fails to do this, the reader can see through the article as just a show to try and turn the incident against Europe. It is also weak because it is clouding the truth and not facing up to the facts. The article diverges away from the incident and further and further away into things that have nothing to do with the incident. From looking at these three very different articles on the same incident, I have found that The Mirror is very good at making the reader feel personally involved, a common tactic used in Britsh tabloids, by giving the incident a British feel. From this comparison, I have found that The Times is very good at keeping the incident international and writing about it in a calm manner. I think that The Times sticks to the facts and portrays the incident as it is and does not over complicate it. I think that on the basis of this, Newsweek does not give the reader all of the information that they require for an exact picture of the incident. It changes the focus of the article and does not let the reader get into the incident in detail. It is, in reality, cheating the readers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Newspapers & Magazines section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Newspapers & Magazines essays

  1. My two articles I have chosen to compare are from the 'The Sun' and ...

    Due to this need for emotions most tabloids will be biased particularly 'The Sun'. In the article being analysed 'The Sun' is biased because it displays hate for the kidnapper: "THE Sun today offers a 50,000 reward to catch the beast who snatched Sarah Payne."

  2. The two articles we have looked at for analysis have a common theme - ...

    She sunbathed recklessly for a nice appearance, not thinking about the future; now she is going to lose the opportunity to give her grandchildren all the love she can and she has set them a bad example which might end up affecting them when they grow up.

  1. Comparison of two texts on the Shetland oil disaster.

    Examples of this language are written in the summary. Words and phrases such as 'relentless storms' are used. Facts are also used to give the reader evidence to show that there was a real disaster and that was not just someone's opinion and idea of a disaster.

  2. Comparing news reports - 'Disaster in the Alps'

    'The Mirror' shows anti-Americanism when describing the incident, they use harsh and blunt sentences like 'plunged 300ft to their deaths' and 'a low flying American warplane sliced through the wire'. These types of sentences make the readers think twice about the event being an unstoppable accident.

  1. Media report on magazine

    The case study I had chosen to provide as my research is from the magazine 'UltraFit'. This is because unlike the other 2 magazines, this magazine has an image of both genders, male and female. On the 'Fitness', magazine, the image given only had a female on the front which indicated that it is mainly aimed for women.

  2. 'Disaster in the Alps' - comparing and analysing how the Times, Mirror and American ...

    There are many facts displayed, painting a graphical image that America is at fault, however fails to see that Italy could also be to blame, highlighting a biased view. We can see that maybe America is being belittled for too little investigative work as it says the accident was being

  1. Analysing the language used by different news reports.

    The language the Times uses to get their view across is all true, and includes no bias. It is the most factually informative account; it includes few emotive words and seems more objective. A lot of the facts it gives are followed by how the incident could have been a

  2. Production Report - Magazine

    These are only some of the codes and conventions I found while researching into magazines. Planning the Production As part of my planning I produced some rough early page designs which showed a rouge layout of where things like text and images were to be placed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work