• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Evaluate The Relationship Between Team Cohesion and Performance in Competitive Sport.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically Evaluate The Relationship Between Team Cohesion and Performance in Competitive Sport. Within sports performance or sports situations, groups are visible to any level, whether they are competitive, spectative, administrative or managerial. Bass (1960) defined a group as a collection of individuals whose existence as a collection is rewarding to the individual. This may ultimately be associated with sporting success when placed in a sporting situation, however socialisation may be the reward gained from any spectators. It could be therefore important to distinguish a team from a group, Weinberg and Gould (1999) highlighted that a team shows more obvious interaction than that of a group. Furthermore Weinberg and Gould (1999) suggested that a collective identity is a distinguishing characteristic for teams. Such examples may come as team names, reputations or rankings. A team although has to survive and work together in order to establish success. The force that holds the team together was described as cohesion. Many definitions have been put forward to describe this concept. Festinger (1950) described it as the resultant forces, which are acting upon members to remain within the group. Cohesion can be defined on two determining factors: Task cohesion and Social cohesion. Weinberg and Gould (1999) addresses task cohesion as the degree to which members work together to achieve common goals, i.e. winning a match or championship, or simply meeting pre set goals. Whereas social cohesion is the degree to which members of a group like each other or interact with each other (Weinberg and Gould, 1999). ...read more.

Middle

Eisler and Spink supported the belief that the cohesiveness of a team around a task may influence to an extent the perceived psychological motivation in a neutral or a positive situation. In translation towards sporting environments and the predicted cohesion-performance link may be effected by motivational factors. This was backed up by Widmeyer and Williams (1991) who found that member satisfaction was the major determinant of both task and social cohesion amongst golfers. Williams and Widmeyer (1991) highlighted that motivation of individuals may also be a problem that has to be addressed. The motivation problems may arise from the perception of the task. Perception of the task ahead may possible influence cohesion and also the individuals perception of cohesiveness may be related to an adherence issue factor (Prapvessis and Carron, 1997) such an adherence issue may be more applicable in the formation stages of a group. However problems with perception of cohesiveness may be that of an expectancy effect, which may underestimate any challenges to cohesion (Dirks, 2000). However personal factors may also include such factors as anxiety, which to an extent may be detrimental to performance. (Weinberg and Gould, 1999) Prapavesis and Carron (1996) found that C.S.A.I (Competitive State Anxiety Inventory) A-state responses were a consequence of cohesion. It must be addressed that some individuals do not just participate for the success, they may participate for the social for the enjoyment and although this may possibly cast doubts over the sources of cohesion, but as Donnelly (1994) ...read more.

Conclusion

This was pointed out, as it was unknown when the effects of cohesion on performance would be noted or become difficult to highlight specific changed when using a correlation system, which is often adopted during many tests. Although a more recent study by Li and Harmer (1996) proposed that the GEQ has adequate factorial validity for measuring group cohesion. Li and Harmer had acted upon claims by Schultz et al., (1994) that the GEQ was an invalid measurement tool for group cohesion. In conclusion it has been shown that an effect for the cohesion-performance linkage does exist, (Mullen and Cooper, 1994) although the extent to which has been discussed (Grieve et al., 2000). It was also found that the relationship between cohesion and performance may have been effected by such factors as suggested by Carron (1982). Problems arising from a causality effect were discussed and it still remains unclear as to which variable actively effects the other. Other limitations regarding administration of the questionnaire for measurement of cohesion have been discussed and the validity of the G.E.Q has been discussed (Brawley, 1990). Overall it may be concluded that research still remains open to the full extent of the relationship. For future research in this area, the causality effect should be investigated and also authors should attempt to move away from correlational studies, to try and establish more viable results. Research should also be encouraged to examine further the differences between group types (interacting or coacting). Any further research would therefore enhance the understanding between the link of cohesion and performance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Acquiring, Developing & Performance Skill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Acquiring, Developing & Performance Skill essays

  1. Psychology in Sport: Anxiety, Stress and Sports Performance

    the curve of performance as predicted in the inverted U hypothesis - this change in performance is often due to physiological changes, which include, an alteration in heart and respiration rates, muscular tension and as a result, impaired movement. Due to this response to anxiety, the athlete or performer will

  2. Self analysis of football performance - Comparison to elite model

    machine for abdominal crunches. Circuit training; Stations that improve core stability. Sit ups (lower abdominals), Stomach crunch (upper abdominals) Back extension chest raise Game Situation 11v11 full sided match. 3 touch maximum and can only score after making 20 passes.

  1. PE coursework Chosen Sport Rugby -working on my weaknesses as a fullback

    All this ensures that the ball remains on the ground and that the contact made on the ball is good. Flood also ensures to steady himself when preparing to kick, holding the ball on each side across the side seams and makes certain that the ball is held perfectly upright.

  2. Group performance and Cohesion

    however this proved to be false as the score was lower then that of the collective one, proving that there were further losses once communication and "co-ordination" between the performers was introduced. Motivational losses are also referred to as social loafing.

  1. Free essay

    A2 PE Factors Affecting Performance - Anxiety / Arousal

    These correlations are .80,.75, and .52, respectively. Suggested Uses: Recommended for studying anxiety in research and clinical settings. Sport Competitive Anxiety Test The Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT) was developed by Rainer Martens and co-workers in 1990. They showed that by analyzing your responses to a series of statements about

  2. Barriers Affecting Disabled People in Sport

    People who work in the public sector have to consider the impact of their work on disabled people, and take action to tackle disability inequality. This should means that disabled people have better employment opportunities and do not come across discrimination when using a service.

  1. Applied Sport Psychology - A case study report of a self directed cognitive-behavioural intervention ...

    two weekly measures but if the intervention had continued this would probably have been the case. Reference to table 1 demonstrates although my client was able to visualise and control an image from an external perspective he found it more difficult to use internal imagery and his awareness of mood during the sessions were particularly low.

  2. Self analysis of weaknesses in table tennis - Comparison to elite model 2

    11, ensure that if I move back and touch the barrier the point is lost) This will be continuous forehand push to forehand push rally's; I chose this because this will increase a the consistency of the shot massively, and improve the overall technique of the shot.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work