• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Performance appraisals are of importance to the organisation, as they often provide the only measure of an individual's contribution and as such the means for identifying either over or under achievement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Running Head: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Performance Management [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Performance Management The basis of the mainstream of performance appraisals within the modern workplace is one person (a manager or executive) rating one more, an intrinsically individual process. There are distinction such as 360 degree appraisals that include the judgment of others such as clientele and peers/colleagues in the process but it is the action of one person transitory judgment upon another that is subjective in nature and the root cause of many of the problems encountered in the research associated with performance appraisals. Performance appraisals are of importance to the organisation, as they often provide the only measure of an individual's contribution and as such the means for identifying either over or under achievement. This information identifies strengths and weaknesses among employees, locating areas for necessary training and development and helps employers implement appropriate reward policies designed to improve the performance of the employees and (as a consequence) the employer (Burns 1996, p.166). They are often also the only means of evaluating the degree of success associated with the various aspects of the recruitment and selection process. "The most fundamental and most difficult problem in any selection research program is to obtain satisfactory criterion for measures of performance on the job against which to validate selection procedures" (Thorndike 2000, p. ...read more.

Middle

Broad distinctions have been made between measures of task proficiency in job performance and what is being called 'contextual performance' (Arvey Murphy 1998). Borman Motowidlo (2003) define task performance as the proficiency with which incumbents perform core technical activities that are important for there jobs and contextual performance as extratask proficiency that contributes more to the organisational, social, and psychological environment to help accomplish organisational objectives. Contextual factors include such aspects as persisting with enthusiasm and extra effort, volunteering to carry out duties not formally part of ones job, and endorsing and supporting organisational objectives. Once what construes 'job performance' has been adequately defined, measurement of said performance needs to occur. Human judgement is subject to many errors and supervisors are often forced to make some subjective judgements. There are a wide range of problems associated with these judgements. Subjectivity opens the door to favouritism, where evaluators act on personal preferences to favour some employees over others and use their power to reward preferred subordinates beyond their true value. Prendergast Topel (1996) found that degree of favouritism was dependent on the incentives offered to the worker, with a stronger correlation between incentive pay and the supervisors' report decreasing reporting accuracy. The effects of favouritism are a deemphasising of incentive pay and bureaucratic rules in pay and promotion decisions where little weight is put on supervisor appraisals and other subjective opinions of performance and excess weight placed on noncorruptible measures such as seniority. ...read more.

Conclusion

Weighting of the objectives then occurs by assigning a relative importance to each of the job elements. Various distinct and measurable levels of performance associated with each job objective are established. When the time for evaluation comes around the employee conducts a self-evaluation prior to the evaluation meeting and the discrepancies form the basis of discussion at the meeting. Research into the relative fairness of performance appraisals and rating systems using concepts of due process and procedural justice, (Folger 2002) has resulted in the development of three characteristics of a due-process appraisal system. These incorporate giving 'adequate notice,' employing organisations should publish, distribute, and explain performance evaluation standards and processes, a 'fair hearing,' a formal review meeting in which an employee is informed of his/her evaluation and 'judgement based on evidence,' raters should apply performance standards consistently across employees, without distortion by external pressures, corruption or personal biases. Despite most performance appraisals being subjective there is increasing optimism regarding the use of supervisory ratings and other 'subjective' appraisal instruments and formats and it is generally recognised that such systems do not automatically translate into rater error or bias and often provide cost effective solutions to the measurement of performance. In light of studies suggesting the relative validity of subjective measures of performance perhaps the one area that organisations could act to improve is the training of managers and supervisors in how to effectively conduct such appraisals (Hubbart 1995). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Acquiring, Developing & Performance Skill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Acquiring, Developing & Performance Skill essays

  1. Pe: Performance Profile Analysis

    I decided to change the amount of pounds I was supposed to lift during this training session. After I completed the weights training session I took part in a little competition my friends had made which was to hold the dumbbells upwards on the side, testing the strength of your

  2. Self analysis of weaknesses in table tennis - Comparison to elite model 2

    A game where we will both serve but there will be a lot of distractions going on in the background which I will need to block out; This will allow me to recreate a gaming situation whilst there are distractions going on.

  1. Justify the concept of performance management and the practical effect in Nasra Group. Identify ...

    3.0 Performance Management - the Practice Nasra aims at providing customer with superior consulting services - those who have been employed would be trained with customer service skills. Employees within the company would gathered on a weekly basis communicating the progress of each task that had been assigned, any new

  2. An analysis and evaluation of pratical investigative assessment.

    Investigative work encompasses a whole range of activities that are centered on helping pupils to learn. It is about encouraging pupils to ask questions and carry out investigations to answer their questions. The cognitive and practical processes of formulating hypothesis, controlling and manipulating variables, making appropriate measurements, interpreting data and

  1. Personal Performance Portfolio for Cricket

    cloth, and aim to pitch in that area. Or, how many times I can hit the off stump. Agreed: I planned that "how many times I can hit the area or the stump in an over". I should be aiming for an 80%+ success rate. Realistically: This task is realistic as it can be done quiet easily, but

  2. Analysing Performance.

    I have learnt four set pieces that involve me and I have performed them during a match and have also succeeded a few times. 14 Strengths I think that I am very committed to the team, confident and reasonably strong.

  1. PPP Action plan 2003.

    Enjoyable: The Training for this will be done solely at training with the team, the players and coach have agreed to help me out as much as possible and think of new ways of getting me to move offensively, as well as running some drills for the whole team, as coach thinks we would all benefit from such drills.

  2. Define personality and how personality affects performance

    Referring to Eysenck theory there are different combinations which can lead to good performance. For example a calm and reliable person playing within an aggressive game will be able to control the game and read it whereas a tough and aggressive person may get to into the atmosphere and are liable to get sent off during play.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work