To investigate how varied types of leadership can affect sports performance.

Authors Avatar

Josh Melling

Leadership

I am going to discuss how varied styles of leadership can affect sports.  I will look into individual, racket and team sports. I will apply my knowledge to show how leadership can prove to be detrimental in the success and failure of the sporting world. Leaders in sport are closely linked to the triumphs and disasters of their team or individual sportspersons. Sir Alf Ramsey will forever be remembered for winning the world cup in 1966 with England. Where as Michael Hagan, the coach of Eric Moussambani, better known as Eric the Eel, will always be linked to the heroic failure that took place at the Sydney Olympics in 2000.

           Triumph                 and                 Disaster.

There are several key points that make a good leader.

  • Providing direct teaching and training in the technical aspect of new skills.
  • Ensuring strategies are in place for engaging in competition.
  • Focusing on strengths and overcoming player’s weaknesses.
  • Managing the communication process to ensure all are on ‘the same page’.
  • Engaging hearts and minds of athletes in sport.

Coaches and leaders approach to teaching and managing have to differ across sports. The world famous manager Sir Alex Ferguson is very much an autocratic leader. His decisions are final in the team and players don’t get an input. What he says goes. Sir Alex has had disagreements with high profile players such as David Beckham and Ruud Van Nistelrooy. This has lead to Beckham now playing in America for L.A Galaxy and Van Nistelrooy in Spain for Real Madrid. Meanwhile Sir Alex is still firmly in charge at Old Trafford pursuing further trophies to add to his already impressive record.

Join now!

In racket and individual sports there will be a much more personal relationship with the player and the coach. A democratic leader will be in favour more than an autocratic leader in one to one situations. However Andy Murray’s ex coach Brad Gilbert was more of an autocratic leader. This method has been proved successful in a way that Murray is the British number 1 and ranked 11th in the world. Now Murray is up there with the best and earning a great deal of money he can afford to sack his coach and pay for a leader who he will ...

This is a preview of the whole essay