• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Codified Constitution?

Extracts from this document...


Politics 'There is no convincing case for a written constitution in Britain' A constitution establishes the rules and principles that govern an organisation. Constitutions are found in many political organisations in government at several levels; in political parties, pressure groups and trade unions. A constitution distributes power within the political system and defines the limits and rights of the government and its citizens. It also defines the nature of citizenship and describes the sovereign territory governed by the constitution. Furthermore, a constitution should define relationships with external bodies and establish how the constitution itself can be amended. Britain's constitution is flexible, meaning policies can be altered via the law making process. This signifies more power for government as it is easier to change laws as they are seen as less fundamental. Our constitution is also unitary, meaning Parliament and Westminster make the laws for all of the UK. ...read more.


This is easier for citizens to understand as well as people in power, as there may be fewer loopholes and it will be easier to draw conclusions on future laws and policies. It is said that the most successful democracies base their institutions on a written constitution, so surely it would be a good idea to join them. However, the reason our constitution has not changed over the centuries, as many other counties constitutions have (e.g. America, Germany, etc), is that the UK has been so stable and worked well over these years of change. The governing leaders of many nations, such as France and Germany, have been forced to alter their constitution to a written one in response to popular revolt or war. It seems that existing arrangements have worked well in practice in the UK and has served Britain well for centuries. Because of this, many people have felt the system should not be tampered with and modified. ...read more.


Moreover, the separation of powers means that government cannot have too much power as the executive, legislature and judiciary do not allow one part to have too high a concentration of power. The judiciary watches over the separation of powers, thus halting an undue concentration of power in one of the three forms of power. Yet, although this stops the executive having too much power, it could be said that this gives the judiciary too much power, therefore proving a written constitution is needed. A written constitution could elucidate the respective powers of government and Parliament. Hence, boosting the ability of government to hold ministers accountable and increasing power of Parliament to scrutinise said ministers on behalf of UK citizens. In conclusion, although a written constitution would make things simpler to understand, an unwritten conclusion means it is easier to amend laws and policies in addition to the constitution itself and even though an unwritten constitution can prove too much power in one place, our constitution has never failed us so why would it be in need of repair? ?? ?? ?? ?? Leah Waterfield ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. priministers power

    o Blair has given his former 'boss' Lord Irvine a central role in his government, not only as Lord Chancellor but as a central policy-maker, for example, Irvine chaired the Cabinet Committee on devolution. o The Restraints on Prime Ministerial Power : Evidence o Most new Prime Ministers feel constrained

  2. What, If Anything, Would Be Achieved By The United Kingdom Adopting A Codified Constitution?

    To embrace a codified constitution would also impose great inflexibility upon the UK. Society is ever changing and consequently, as a response to these changes, the rules governing society need to evolve, thus, by cementing the rules by which a nation must follow by, would stall evolution.

  1. Should Britain adopt a written constitution?

    Moreover, with a written constitution, the people?s rights are clearer and this extinguishes the fear of not knowing their rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 only offers partial protection but if it is in the constitution, it clears the air and there is more certainty in identifying the rights of the people.

  2. Should the UK have a codified constitution?

    So I agree more strongly with the argument for keeping the uncodified constitution. Those in favour of keeping the constitution as it is also argue that the traditional elements of government, such as the House of Lords and the Monarchy, moderate the decisions made by the government and the House of Commons.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work