• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

�zge Baloglu Esra K�rpez WLL 13-01-2003 A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies Jean-Jacque Rousseau is the intellectual forerunner of radical socialism, especially the thought of Karl Marx. In spite of different opinions on the issues of state and government, family, religion and civil society, Rousseau's ideas about private property,freedom,equality,division of labor and ideal society greatly influenced Marx's point of view on these issues. Private Property: Both Rousseau and Marx opposed private property. According to Marx, private property is the result of alienated labor. Private property also the means by which the labor is alienated. Namely it is both the cause and the effect of alienated labor. For this reason Marx wanted to change who owned property. He wanted to take all the capitalist property and make it publicly owned. Rousseau too attacked the institution of private property and thought that a society founded on private property, which is legitimized by the social contract, inevitably degenerates into despotism. ...read more.

Middle

State and Government: Rousseau's and Marx's opinions about state and government were not similar.While Marx was against state and government, Rousseau was for them. In Marx's opinion, state is, by definition, nothing more than an instrument of social control used by the members of one class to suppress the members of another and so he thought that state and government limit people's freedom. According to him, without economic classes, there would be no need for a state. State is a coercive power for class domination, therefore, he argued that communist administrative organ would not be a state in itself, because society would be classless and this administration would not exercise coercion. On the other hand, Rousseau does not advocate abolishing the state and government. Instead, he thought that a small state is good for people's self government. Division of Labor: Marx's analysis of the division of labor was remarkably similar to Rousseau's. Both argued that the desire for private property led to the division of labor, and this in turn gave rise to the existence of separate social classes based on economic differences and inequality. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Rousseau ideal society, common well-being rather than individual preference would be the superior. There would be no justification of ownership of goods. And to serve equality would be the first goal of his society. Civil Society: They are not like-minded about the issue of civil society. According to Marx, civil society is a terrible and destructive social system because its social effect is to sever all man's species-ties, substitute egoism and selfish need for those ties, and dissolve the human world into a world of mutually hostile individuals. Therefore, he thought that civil society is the cause of men's problems. On the other hand, for Rousseau, civil society is necessary to transform the individual into an intelligent being and a man. Civil society is essential if men are to exercise and develop their faculties, broaden their ideas and feelings, and uplift their souls. Karl Marx followed in the communitarianism tradition of political authority and obedience pioneered by Jean-Jacque Rousseau. Rousseau set the cornerstone and Marx was architect of the socialistic monument built upon it. The similarities between their ideologies shows how profoundly Marx was influenced by Rousseau. Baloglu 2 Baloglu 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    periodic crises, caused by glutting of markets and accompanied by general unemployment. (Johnston, 1986) Though Marx claimed that capitalism had reached its optimum, it did not fall. Because the future is indeterminate, he could not foresee that efforts might produce the opposite of intentions, ushering in a new form of society significantly different from the old.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    strict control over all levels of education and barred all liberal literature and art from entering Russia; not unlike the regime that the Tsars ruled by. What became apparent after a few years was that power stemmed from the top, just like under the Tsars.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    rights, that is, out of the need for protection of the privacy of property, could not manifest itself publicly through excessive social control. Perhaps Locke's idea is better explained this way. "From privacy of possession, publicity of sovereignty does not follow...'no Man could ever have a just Power over the

  2. Natural Science

    It is this further investigation, the details of it, the knowledge of difficulties, of the general state of knowledge, the recognition of objections that distinguishes "respectable" thinker from the crank".2 In his view science is a religion, for it rests on certain dogmas that cannot be rationally justified.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    84. Were they general or partial strikes? 85. Were they for the object of increasing wages, or were they organized to resist a reduction of wages, or connected with the length of the working day, or prompted by other motives? 86. What were their results? 87. Tell us of the activity of the courts of arbitration.

  2. This essay is aimed to distinguished between what Marx mean by Alienation in relation ...

    that is, must interact with nature and other human beings to make things and effect changes in the world around us? By species being is to be distance from our fundamental nature as productive beings. Now how is this possible?

  1. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    took their place. It is also important to note at this stage the very obvious feature of John Stuart Mill which is his liberalism. Liberalism rests on the concept of freedom, a concept that is the key element to Mill's 'On Liberty' which is an important text to study in order to understand his views on social and economic progress.

  2. What exactly is religion?

    God did not create humanity: humanity creates its Gods. The phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as alienation. Alienation is a situation in which the creations of humanity appear alien, that is, we do not recognise our own hand in their creation and assign to them

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work