• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Criticism of the Supremacy of Science.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Criticism of the Supremacy of Science ` There are several different criticisms that have been commonly levelled at science and scientists as a whole. During the course of this essay I shall attempt to identify these criticisms and identify the reasoning behind each of them. The first of these criticisms is that science has been given similar status to a religion. It was commonly thought in the early days of science that science would eventually develop a theory for everything, thereby replacing religion through removing the ambiguous and the incomprehensible parts of life with which religion dealt. In many ways science has replaced religion in the 21st century, as it has become the object of faith and even devotion. A blind faith has been placed in the unquestionable correctness of science and scientific research. It was Emile Durkheim who first advanced the theory that given enough time, science would replace all traditional religions to be replaced by a formal, unquestionable religion based upon science. It is the arrogance of many scientists that leads us to believe that scientific theories are facts, and can be treated as 'truth' replacing religion by explaining the facts behind the creation and existence of the world. ...read more.

Middle

However, this strong criticism of science can be taken even further. Karl Popper put forward the theory that scientific 'facts' of the present day are simply probabilities, and only hold this status until such time as new evidence emerges allowing the theory to be dropped or adapted. Thomas Kuhn took this criticism of scientists even further, he believed that scientists, for the vast majority of the time, went to great lengths to fit their experiments to already existing theories, or when new information was taken into account, and it was simply accommodated by existing theories rather than new theories being created. Kuhn went further in his criticism; he claimed that when new theories were advanced, it was normally due to a competition between two scientists. Eventually, one theory would emerge victorious, however, this emergence, claimed Kuhn, had little to do with the correctness or otherwise of the theory and more to do with the political connections and status of the scientists involved in the battle. Feyerabend takes his criticism of the methodology of science to the extreme and claims that the scientific experiments are not based on observation of facts, but interpretation of what was seen. ...read more.

Conclusion

In fact, scientific supremacy has been taken so far through arrogance that the truth of science, as well as being rarely questioned, has gained the status of religion in our modern society, although science can never explain the human tendency to a belief in a 'God' or a supernatural being, nor can it prove to the contrary. In this, however, I believe we see even more apparently the human desire for something to believe in, and despite its many flaws, for some people, science provides the alternative to a religion. Furthermore, in the attempt to maintain the belief that all scientific theories should be taken as gospel, scientists simply attempt to fit new information into old theories, or when a theory must be disregarded, it is described as 'unscientific'. Scientific theories are also subject to human observation and therefore preconceived ideas, notions and creative thoughts. In this respect therefore, the observations can be made to fit the preconceived ideas. The supremacy of western science over other scientific cultures is also questionable as there are different ways to conduct science. In short, western science has arrogantly given the impression that there is only one true scientific method, that used by western scientists. This arrogance has led western peoples to believe unquestioningly in what scientists say, and those who read it unquestioningly apparently regard all scientific theory as absolutely correct. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    for mankind as dreamers who "who misled the people by elevating them to a sovereignty which they were incapable of exercising".[10] The debate between those who deemed the revolutionary ideas to be scientific and those who considered them a mere dogma continued into the 19th century and were further developed

  2. Marxism Can Only Be Appreciated Retrospectively

    Because of this Marx calls 'value' a product of capitalism because the ideal price (what it's exchange at in the market) and the ways in which it's meant to be used (use value) clearly show the ways the capitalists exploit the workers during the means of production as many of

  1. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    factors that were required, there needed to be a working coalition between the 'urban working classes and industrial bourgeoisie' (Blakeley, 2004), the state would have to get involved in the moving of resources from agriculture to industry and the land owning elites who had controlled the economical, political and societal

  2. What exactly is religion?

    As Feuerbach puts it:"...Thought arises from being - being does not arise from thought." Even religious beliefs, and "sacred texts", require humanity to have existed, and more importantly, formulated the ideas that form any given religion. This is called "materialism" as opposed to "idealism".

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    As Hinsley (1986:121) explains, the recognition of an absolute power was essential if the political community was to escape the disharmony set up by the conflict of new developments with medieval and feudal fetters, and if it was to maintain its security and achieve its social objectives.

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Because if they became egoists, they may sacrifice his interests to improve theirs. So, the total egoist will proclaim universalism or altruism to be the theory to follow, all the time waiting for the chance to take advantage of those who follow his advice.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    each act of taxation, is specifically consented to. In the issue of taxation, Locke slips, without justification, from insisting on the individual's consent to taxation which is consistent to everything thus said to assuming that there exists somewhere some form of institution expression for such a consent which it does not.

  2. Natural Science

    It was the question he asked which gave birth to science, as we know it today. Another Ionian Greek, Anaximenes of Miletus, asked such questions as: "What is matter? What laws govern the transformations which it undergoes?" In seeking answers to these questions, he made systematic observations and conducted experiments;

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work