• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government.

Extracts from this document...


A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government First we must define what Liberal Democracy actually is. From the Oxford companion to politics Liberal Democracy is described as "A system of rule embracing elected officers who undertake to represent the interests or views of citizens within the framework of the rule of law. Representative democracy means that decisions affecting a community are taken not by its members as a whole but by a group of people whom 'the people' have elected for this purpose. In the arena of national politics, representative democracy takes the form of elections to congresses, parliaments etc ...," (Democracy, The Oxford Companion to Politics). Basically what is being said here is that "Decisions are made after consultation with the group," (Leadership Styles, Between Ourselves). On a larger scale, that the citizens construct a large part of the goings-on in government. A Liberal Democracy has a number of features. There should be free, regular and competitive elections of representatives at all levels, in order to provide for accountability of the governors to the governed. There should be acceptance of the legitimacy of government, and respect for the rights of individuals and of minorities, often codified in a formal bill of rights. There should be opportunities for public participation in politics, and particularly through a broad range of pressure groups - this is called pluralism, a system in which all interests are represented and have access to government. ...read more.


Therefore there has to be a system of law and institutions which protect individual freedom. Anarchy cannot protect freedom. Democracy is the best known means of achieving that protection through collective institutions, but if it produces simply the tyranny of the majority it is not Liberal Democracy. 1.3 Constitutional protection of minority rights and barriers to the oppressive use of majority power are essential elements of Liberal Democracy, which is the antithesis of the socialist concept of democratic centralism. In many cases the lowest possible level for a decision is the level of the individual, and what is sought is to keep decision-making at that level if possible. Where that is not possible, if a decision can be taken at the level of a small local community, it should be taken there, rather than at national or supra-national level. 1.4 Equally; because some decisions have to be taken at the national, European or global level in order to be effective - for example in safeguarding peace, assuring human rights or protecting the environment - there need to be democratic institutions capable of taking decisions at that level. 1.5 The freedom of the individual is, however, limited or non-existent if he or she is prevented by economic deprivation, lack of education, disadvantage or discrimination from exercising choices about how to live or from participating in the democratic process. ...read more.


Creating a society which is liberal is part of the contest of ideas within society: liberal democracy is a system which allows people to live together in freedom and peace whether or not they share the same ideas. 1.10 Social and economic inequalities are a key issue in debates on political principles. When equality is pursued as a goal, it also tends to lead to the belief that the central state has the power to achieve it and must be trusted to do so, whatever the cost in liberty. Many of the most repressive regimes of the twentieth century amassed state power claiming that it was necessary to promote equality. 1.11 Rights and freedoms conflict with each other. The right to free speech can conflict with the right of minorities or even majorities not to be the subject of campaigns to stir up hatred. Religious freedom can be in conflict with a desire to protect young people from oppressive pressures to conform to particular life styles, whether by extreme cults or by traditions such as arranged marriages if they become forced marriages. Taxation restricts the rights of those who believe that they should not be paying towards things to which they are deeply morally opposed, such as military expenditure or abortion. 1.12 Liberalism as a philosophy provides no automatic answer to these conflicts of rights: indeed, its belief in democratic and constitutional procedures recognises their existence and provides mechanisms for their resolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    of years and are not the fault of democracy and if anything it is democracy that is preventing these long time enemies going to war. Realists have raised the question as to how "democratic peace" theorists can be sure that a world of democratic states would never experience war when such a world has never existed.

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Adam Smith was capitalist and believed the individual should be able to choose. Smith favoured a 'laisser-faire' market which translated meant a free market economy. Smith wanted minimal government interference, this meant getting rid of such things as apprenticeship rules, monopolies, tariffs and duties.

  1. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    Liberals stress the importance of nation states cooperation with to prevent conflict. This is evident in contemprary politics, for example in the case of the development of nuclear weapons in Iran, The United Nations stepped in providing a resolution instead of the US taking the matter into their own hands.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    It is not clear whether these cases fall under Mill's theory as involving harm to others or not. b) Harm and Political Speech: One area deserves particular note, the area of political speech. Some political demonstrations and speech can cause social unrest.

  1. Would a world of democratic states prevent war?

    following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington on September 11th 2001, is to remove the Taliban, the current rulers of Afghanistan and replace them with a democratic governing body. The third assumption made by President Clinton in his 1994 speech, was that with every nation following the democratic system of government that America's own security would be ensured.

  2. Political Parties, Role and Ideology/Policies Qa (i) Ideology is the core fundamental beliefs ...

    Inequality is now accepted, but there are measures to prevent too much inequality. As one can see, New Labour has dramatically shifted from Old Labour. It has not completely abandoned its core beliefs, but it has modified them so that they appear more appealing to the general public.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    In this case there will certainly be a need for some type of coercive force to protect one's property. The idea of minimal government with the purpose of only protecting property is a good one as people are not as dangerous as Hobbes believed but would still need some type of regulation and enforcement of property laws.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Although this new cooperative relationship between the executive and a coalition in the legislature may appear to have the potential to promote party system formation, this is not the case. Part of the strength of the pro-government forces is due to Putin courting individual leaders in the KPRF to weaken the party's ability to oppose him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work