• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government.

Extracts from this document...


A Report Outlining the Basic Features Of Liberal-Democratic Government First we must define what Liberal Democracy actually is. From the Oxford companion to politics Liberal Democracy is described as "A system of rule embracing elected officers who undertake to represent the interests or views of citizens within the framework of the rule of law. Representative democracy means that decisions affecting a community are taken not by its members as a whole but by a group of people whom 'the people' have elected for this purpose. In the arena of national politics, representative democracy takes the form of elections to congresses, parliaments etc ...," (Democracy, The Oxford Companion to Politics). Basically what is being said here is that "Decisions are made after consultation with the group," (Leadership Styles, Between Ourselves). On a larger scale, that the citizens construct a large part of the goings-on in government. A Liberal Democracy has a number of features. There should be free, regular and competitive elections of representatives at all levels, in order to provide for accountability of the governors to the governed. There should be acceptance of the legitimacy of government, and respect for the rights of individuals and of minorities, often codified in a formal bill of rights. There should be opportunities for public participation in politics, and particularly through a broad range of pressure groups - this is called pluralism, a system in which all interests are represented and have access to government. ...read more.


Therefore there has to be a system of law and institutions which protect individual freedom. Anarchy cannot protect freedom. Democracy is the best known means of achieving that protection through collective institutions, but if it produces simply the tyranny of the majority it is not Liberal Democracy. 1.3 Constitutional protection of minority rights and barriers to the oppressive use of majority power are essential elements of Liberal Democracy, which is the antithesis of the socialist concept of democratic centralism. In many cases the lowest possible level for a decision is the level of the individual, and what is sought is to keep decision-making at that level if possible. Where that is not possible, if a decision can be taken at the level of a small local community, it should be taken there, rather than at national or supra-national level. 1.4 Equally; because some decisions have to be taken at the national, European or global level in order to be effective - for example in safeguarding peace, assuring human rights or protecting the environment - there need to be democratic institutions capable of taking decisions at that level. 1.5 The freedom of the individual is, however, limited or non-existent if he or she is prevented by economic deprivation, lack of education, disadvantage or discrimination from exercising choices about how to live or from participating in the democratic process. ...read more.


Creating a society which is liberal is part of the contest of ideas within society: liberal democracy is a system which allows people to live together in freedom and peace whether or not they share the same ideas. 1.10 Social and economic inequalities are a key issue in debates on political principles. When equality is pursued as a goal, it also tends to lead to the belief that the central state has the power to achieve it and must be trusted to do so, whatever the cost in liberty. Many of the most repressive regimes of the twentieth century amassed state power claiming that it was necessary to promote equality. 1.11 Rights and freedoms conflict with each other. The right to free speech can conflict with the right of minorities or even majorities not to be the subject of campaigns to stir up hatred. Religious freedom can be in conflict with a desire to protect young people from oppressive pressures to conform to particular life styles, whether by extreme cults or by traditions such as arranged marriages if they become forced marriages. Taxation restricts the rights of those who believe that they should not be paying towards things to which they are deeply morally opposed, such as military expenditure or abortion. 1.12 Liberalism as a philosophy provides no automatic answer to these conflicts of rights: indeed, its belief in democratic and constitutional procedures recognises their existence and provides mechanisms for their resolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Since God gave us the earth to use "to the best advantage of life," anyone who lets the land perish and rot has "offended against the common law of nature" (140). Therefore, one can only possess as much land as they can cultivate and use, without wasting anything.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    (From the editor's introduction to Mill's On Liberty, quotation marks surround Mill's words) a) What is a distinct and assignable obligation? A distinct and assignable obligation is where there is someone who has either a right, or a legitimate claim or expectation, which the obligated person is bound to honor.

  1. "How democratic is the UK?"

    This is one of the major problems of our democratic system of government and it is very difficult to change without abandoning a fully democratic system and converting to a democracy of the educated classes.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This neglect stems in part from the tendency, widespread in both the corporate community and management literature, to consider conflict itself as something highly undesirable and potentially pathological and, therefore, as something to be defeated (Hardy and Clegg 1996: 627-8; Pfeffer 1981: 2-9).

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    The blood feud mentioned in section 1 had come to a head when Solon was called to rescue Athens from herself (594 B.C.). The faction supporting Cylon's party and the one behind the Alcmeonids had ripped the city in two.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    Ancient democracy did not presuppose equality of all individuals; the majority of the populace, notably slaves and women, had no political rights. Athens, the greatest of the city democracies, limited the franchise to native-born citizens. Roman democracy resembled that of the Greeks, although Rome sometimes granted citizenship to men of non-Roman descent.

  1. Political Parties, Role and Ideology/Policies Qa (i) Ideology is the core fundamental beliefs ...

    It has also done away with its traditional image of being very close to trade unions; a good example of this is when the RMT Union was kicked out of the party. It has shifted towards the right more and more and some would say that it has abandoned the ideals of true Labour.

  2. What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory (10) Examine and ...

    The above people all believed in utilitarianism, but some philosophers have not, and I will now explain their views. A good valid argument to utilitarianism comes from D. D. Raphael "... let us imagine that the happiness of the whole human race were to be immeasurably increased...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work