• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A small, unpopular party whose success was due solely to the determination of the leader to seize power" Examine this assessment of the Bolshevik party's success in the USSR 1917-1924.

Extracts from this document...


"A small, unpopular party whose success was due solely to the determination of the leader to seize power" Examine this assessment of the Bolshevik party's success in the USSR 1917-1924. This assessment of the party is based around one of many views on how the Bolsheviks gained power and consolidated their rule. This particular assessment focuses on the "brutalisation" of the party and Lenin's constant concessions in the face of danger despite contending his ideology. The Bolsheviks came to power in October 1917, after the capture of the Winter Palace; the consolidation of their rule included the calling of a constituent assembly, signing of the Brest-litovsk and the introduction of the NEP after War Communism. What I now have to analyse, is the validity of each point in the above assessment, was the party small? Or unpopular? And if so why? Firstly the size of the party has to be considered, before the February revolution the party's size in comparison with other parties was relatively little. The largest parties were those who directly contended the Tsarist regime in towns and villages, one party in particular was the Social Democratic party, as written by Susan Hasler (1989) ...read more.


During the Konstradt revolt the Bolsheviks lost popularity "July Days" saw the popularity of the Mensheviks raise as they countered the revolutionary mobs from the Konstradt naval base. However during the Kornilov coup Bolshevik intervention protected Kerensky from an "overthrow" regaining their popularity. By October the Provisional Government had lost so much support that a drunken takeover of the Winter Palace could not even be constrained. The Bolsheviks, during their reign were not the most popular party, in the Constituent Assembly, with Social Democrats gaining twice as many votes as the Bolsheviks. As written by Eugine Frazer (1984) "The bread queues grow longer every day and often, after standing for hours on end there is nothing left" Popularity, especially in the urban areas, was declining. This unpopularity, links to Lenin's success, he began to make concessions for the people, increasing his power and maintaining hold on power. He made himself more popular by ending the war, giving peasants the land they needed and giving the people a Constituent Assembly. ...read more.


concentrate large forces in any one location," This shows the determination of Lenin, to defeat opposition and maintain power, if we link this to the Constituent Assembly, we could say some sides in the "Whites" were better suited to govern the country, in particular the Social Democratic Party. Other views are also considerable, the Soviet view sees the events of October as a popular rising, which contends the view of unpopularity, and also contends the need to "seize power" as, in this view, many supported Lenin's right for power. I conclude that the assessment is false, although parts do correspond to the state of the party, at certain times; it is not generalisable of the events from 1917-1924, I agree the Bolshevik party was small, yet it grew as it's power became established, I agree that, at times the party was unpopular, but when It counted the people supported the "Reds" and as for their success, it cannot be based solely on Lenin's determination, but many other factors such as the weakness of opposition, conditions within Russia, and attitudes of the people. By Zak Smith L6AMO Words: 1087 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    people of purely Spanish descent. Obviously, the fact of interbreeding diluted the substratic binary which was the justification for so much of coloniality's repressive action. Interbreeding has a form of mirror-image in diaspora: the penetration of the metropole by substantial numbers of colonial 'other.'

  2. "Ideology played relatively small role in the revolutions of 1848" Discuss.

    When the information of the outburst of the revolution came to Austrian Empire, manifestations, organised mainly by students, began. On the 13th of March there were street-fights in Vienna. Matternich, who was highly influential in Hapsburg Monarchy, fled in fear of riots.

  1. The strategic retreat of NEP (New Economic Policy), Lenin said, was forced on the ...

    were effectively outlawed from this time on. Lenin's eagerness to crush actual or potential opposition was startlingly demonstrated in a secret letter to the Politburo of 19 March 1922 in which he urged his colleagues to seize the opportunity offered by the famine to break the power of the Orthodox Church.

  2. Describe and account for the decline of the Green Party

    I believe however, that this picture of the British Green Party is misleading. The questions that should be asked are, why did the British Green Party achieve such a remarkable result and why did it fail to build on it's 1989 success?

  1. Free essay

    The emerge of Alliance 90

    Citizenship is traditionally concerned with the way individuals behave in the public sphere, but the private acts associated with day-to-day lifestyles have public implications, so ecological citizenship must include the private sphere. 3. It is associated with virtues that enable citizens to meet their obligations; in particular, the social justice

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    (Wynia, 1998, pp214 - 282) The political structure that was formed after 1891 had noticeable and real prospects, but, what emerged was two structures. There was the constitutional arrangement which added legitimacy by enfranchising those who lived in the towns (middle classes)

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    counter to its goals (for example, signing the "nine-plus-one" agreement and choosing Alexandr Rutskoi as his running mate, and adopted an aloof campaign stance that deprived Democratic Russia of the leadership it needed to prevent it from fragmenting along internal fault lines (Urban 1993).

  2. Explain why these policies (State Capitalism, War Communism and the N.E.P) aroused opposition within ...

    They did not want Lenin to be the same and because State Capitalism was similar to what had happened when the Tsar had been in power they believed that change would not be coming. However things changed slightly when War Communism was introduced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work