• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A written constitution, rather than gradual reform, is now essential for the UK to claim to be a modern democracy."

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"A written constitution, rather than gradual reform, is now essential for the UK to claim to be a modern democracy." This essay will look at how a written constitution, according to some, would make Britain a modern democracy and it is therefore essential that the meaning of this phrase is fully understood before it can be explored in sufficient depth. A written constitution would outline the structures and powers of government in broad terms and the relationship between the different parts of government and citizens. Gradual reform, on the other hand, has no written record of the powers of government or a clear relationship between government and citizens; however, these are determined by laws that evolve with the current views and morals of Britain. A modern democracy can be interpreted differently by people and that is a fundamental reason for this conflict of interest. Some people, such as the Liberal Democrats, believe that the constitution would make Britain a 'modern democracy' because the basic principles of Britain would be defined and that there would be no loop holes in the law as to how the government can enforce new proposals. ...read more.

Middle

This is because a referendum could be made mandatory under the written constitution and this would satisfy the Liberal Democrats. The individual rights of citizens could be improved by making government less centralised, thereby making political factors such as taxation, local decision and policies more representative of people in a constituency. A constitution could enforce the empowerment of local government and regional assemblies, such as the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly, and this would make decentralisation mandatory. Lord Hailsham referred to centralisation as "an elective dictatorship" and this clearly portrays some opinion towards the state of our current system of gradual reform. The advantages of decentralisation are that specialisation in certain fields would allow local government to provide better education, healthcare and legal orders, such as the 'anti social order' that can be used in areas of high crime and were public nuisances are. Even on a national scale, decentralisation can occur by setting up specialist areas of government to deal with more complex issue, such as the protection of minorities. Therefore, not only would a written constitution provide equality and fairness in local areas, but it would also improve the efficiency of the government regarding its relation to special areas. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Scottish Parliament building is an example of how costs can sky rocket from their original predicted cost and also the length of time that is required to be extended. An estimated time to fully complete the constitution is ten years, by which time, societies needs will have changed. It would be unachievable for other reasons, such as the issue regarding who would write it. This would be unachievable because conflicts of interest would occur and therefore lengthy debates would delay the process and on some points such as immigration and tuition fees, no agreement could be made. The constitution would need to be flexible, yet definitive and therefore, in the opinion of some, because of the disagreement and mass debates, the constitution could not be flexible due to the fact that it would be difficult to amend and also that it could not possibly be definitive as it would have to be so vague that people reach a common opinion and understanding. Therefore, despite all the other reasons against the constitution, according to some, the written constitution is simply not possible due to the length of time it would require to be put in force and the disagreements that would prevent it from being definitive as a result of the broadness that would bring about any compromise. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    This would not be seen as a step forward democratically for the UK. The arguments for a written constitution are that the government is too powerful. For example the Blair government has such a huge majority the executive is in effect ruling the country and not parliament.

  2. Federalism essay

    Like Germany, the Constitution of the United States is built around the concept of the separation of powers and a system of checks and balances. This Constitution was drawn up in 1787 by the Founding Fathers, to replace the weak confederation that had existed since the Declaration of Independence.

  1. Why Has It proved So Difficult To Reform Campaign Finance

    In doing this, the state hopes to increase the importance of their state in choosing major party presidential candidates. With the onset of this increasing number of states looking to 'front load' there is relatively little time to raise money once the primaries have actually begun.

  2. Should the UK have a written constitution?

    It would also give the UK a chance to get rid of out-of-date parts of its constitution, such as the hereditary monarchy. However this would be very difficult to do as the Queen still has to sign all bills to make them Acts of parliament, and it is doubtful she would sign a bill that would abolish the monarchy.

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Again, this interlinks with the effects of pressure groups building iron triangles. Groups such as those that represent various ethnic Americans are good examples. These can include the American Jewish Congress or the Organisation of Chinese Americans. Critics view such groups as splitting society by accentuating 'me' rather than 'we'.

  2. The Referendum

    It is the only means to legally alter the 1937 constitution that underpins all legislation, and since 1937, a total of twenty-five referendums to amend the Constitution have been held. Seven of which have been rejected. The issues involved have often related to major social issues, including the unique position of the Roman Catholic Church, divorce, and abortion.

  1. US constitution and reform

    The declining importance of the political parties has undermined the traditional coordinating role that parties used to play in easing tensions and bringing members of Congress and the President together. An important issue exists for the American people. It is difficult to identify who is responsible for a particular action or decision.

  2. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    one Constitutions have certain essential characteristics, none of them found in Britain in what in our own opinion might call a consiitution. The British constitution has evolved over many centuries. Unlike the constitutions of America, France and many Commonwealth countries, the British constitution has not been assembled at any time into a single, consolidated document.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work