• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

According to Henry David Thoreau "that government is best which governs not at all" do you agree with him?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

According to Henry David Thoreau "that government is best which governs not at all" do you agree with him? Henry David Thoreau's a controversial theorist writing against the backdrop of 19th Century America. As an advocate of individual freedoms and limited government, Thoreau's work can be seen as a rejection of the social and political inequalities, in particular the culture of slavery, rife throughout the US at this time. Thoreau believes that all individuals should have the right to follow their conscience and that when the state restricts the conscience of any group or individual, it is the responsibility of all how are aware to speak out against this. These ideas prove the framework around which Thoreau builds his utopia view of the state, in which the rights and beliefs of all members of society are upheld at all times. Whilst few would disagree with Thoreau's rejection of slavery and call for expanded social and political freedoms, it is important to emphasis the idealistic, at times illogical and ultimately unattainable nature of his theory. Thoreau proposes that governments tend towards perversion and abuse, before the expression of the will of the governed. ...read more.

Middle

In other words Thoreau envisages the ideal state as that which does not infringe upon the inner beliefs of any of its citizens. Thoreau is not suggesting anarchy but instead a vision in which governments constantly strive to remove those features which conflict with the conscience of its members. Whilst Thoreau's argument at first sight appears appealing due to its emphasis upon individual freedom from restraint it is also highly idealistic. The complexity and size of modern state makes it impossible for all citizens to articulate their particular grievance with the political establishment effectively. Additionally, even if the state were able to see before it the conscience of all its citizens, it would still be impossible to reconcile the vast plurality of religious, political and economic convictions that exist within the modern state. This point is illustrated by Marx in his work in 'Marx-Engels reader' on 'the Jewish question' in which he argues that a Jew living within a Christian state can never be free as long as he remains a Jew, for his interests will inherently clash with those of the Christian state because they hold different moral convictions, for Marx this situation is reconciled via ...read more.

Conclusion

Weber's conception of the state is not without problems, this however is not our subject matter, and instead Weber's work is useful as it exposes the unworldly idealism contained within Thoreau's theoretical vision of the state. Thoreau's struggle against the suppression and torture of the US slave trade during the Mexican war is commendable; however the theory he used to reject slavery is not as appealing. Within today's political climate the rights and freedoms of citizens are surprised in a far more limited way than was the case when Thoreau wrote. However it is still nothing but fanciful to imagine that all citizens could follow their conscience without irreconcilable conflicts arising that in their resolution will have a winner and a loser. Whilst it is clear that government are always potentially and often actually corruption and that the freedoms of some individuals will be restricted by the state, at least on some issues. Rather than seeking to remove these inherent problems of rule it is preferable to argue that the state should ensure that no individual, minority or majority group should be able to dominate the political agenda at all times. This grounds Thoreau's desire to maximise freedom of ones conscience from coercion within the world of modern politicians. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - There are several strengths of this piece. It is articulately written, explaining Thoreau's key beliefs intelligently, and evaluating them in comparison to other political ideas and events. Where this essay could be improved is with greater use of primary supporting material instead of paraphrasing. The conclusion only really addresses the question implicitly.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 15/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is war Inevitable?

    His forces committed numerous atrocities during the war, including the systematic genocide of an estimated six million Jews, known as the Holocaust, as well as various other groups of people.

  2. Government and Politics Personal Statement

    Managing the finances of the company was a valuable experience, learning how money should be dealt with carefully and allocated precisely where it is needed.

  1. Compare and contrast the UK and US political parties and their party systems

    The democratic party is more economically liberal(or pro-government intervention in economy)while the Republican Party was more economically conservative(or laissez faire)

  2. Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

    There are of course fundamental differences between the positive and negative concepts of liberty, one being their views on factors that are external or internal to a person.

  1. Nationalism. Where do nations come from? Are they natural or artificial formations?

    As a reaction to the first approach the second approach was envisaged and is called the instrumentalist or modernist approach, which by contrast, emphasizes that nations are artificial, manipulated and constructed phenomenon that only occur as a result of social and economic changes (Gellner, 1964).

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Locke also defends the principle of majority rule and the separation of legislative and executive powers. In the Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke denied that coercion should be used to bring people to what the ruler believes is the true religion and also denied that churches should have any coercive power over their members.

  1. Define hegemony and explain its significance for Global World Order. (15)

    A state with hegemonic status such as the USA currently is certainly seen as the installer of New World Order. This is certainly conceivable, pressure is usually put on hegemonic state to act in the event of crisis. Whether it be a crisis in close proximity to the state itself or whether the crisis is in another continent.

  2. What were the most important factors in the rise of the modern state?

    Looking at a map of Europe at around 1500, one sees that the region is divided into hundreds of small states with unclear borders causing difficulties for the king in terms of being able to oversee the land. This system was the source of economic and social chaos and as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work