• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the much lower level of strike incidence in Britain in recent years. Are strikes 'withering away' as a feature of British industrial relations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Debbie Hardy 15/05/02 Account for the much lower level of strike incidence in Britain in recent years. Are strikes 'withering away' as a feature of British industrial relations? Strikes are often seen as workers most powerful weapon in a dispute because of the financial loss imposed upon the employer. They can generally be defined as a 'collective withdrawal from work by employees intended to modify employer behaviour'. The official definition of a strike in Britain are those lasting at least a day and involving at least ten workers, unless a total of 100 or more striker days is involved. Strikes are counted by the Employment Department, which uses reports from Unemployment Benefit offices, returns from some public sector organisations and newspapers and other sources, to identify stoppages. There are three main measures of strikes: the number of separate stoppages; the number of workers involved; and the number of days 'lost'. The number of recorded strikes was larger decade by decade in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. The upward trend peaked in 1970 at 3906 strikes and by 1979 the number had fallen to 2080. But both the other two measures of strike activity - the number of workers involved and working days lost - were historically high in the 1970s. In the 1980s the decline in the number of strikes speeded up and there were major reductions in the other two measures of strike activity. ...read more.

Middle

Not only would the collaborative culture of 'beer and sandwiches at 10 Downing Street' end - a frontal attack to smash the militants' section of the trade unions would be launched. The Thatcher government saw its polices in the origins in the New Right, with its emphasis on the free working of markets and the need to minimise state interferences. As union bargaining strength was considered to stem from immunities in relation to industrial action and the 'coercive poor' of the closed shop these became central targets to the government's legislative programme. A policy of enterprise 'confinement' was pursued in restricting the scope of lawful industrial action. Immunities were seen by the government as unique 'privileges' putting trade unions 'above the law', and were narrowed significantly by successive pieces of legislation. As part of the government's step-by-step approach, the stream of Acts of Parliament since 1980 in dealing with trade unions altered the legal position of strikers and their unions. Over powerful unions were, in the eyes of the Conservative Party, too ready to use strikes to get their way: 'strikes are too often a weapon of first rather than last resort' (Conservative Party Manifesto, 1979). Strikes had become for the Conservative Party, the symbol of the abuse of their power by trade union. The 1982 Act on strikes made key alteration in the law, which severely reduced trade union immunity from legal action. If the unions were to avoid losing immunity, they would have to give up certain types of strike action. ...read more.

Conclusion

'Pendulum arbitration' (forced choice) is often seen as a solution but it is of limited value in practice. It is not good for multi issue disputes and is unhelpful for long-term relationships. The main reasons for the decline in strike activity then since 1979 appear to have been economic rather than the result of legislation. Rising unemployment between 1979 and 1986, and again between 1989 and 1993, reduced the willingness of employees to take strike action. This was accompanied by a significant restructuring of the economy, with a decline in strongly unionised and more strike prone traditional industries and a growth in poorly unionised and less strike prone service industries. Although strikes are much less frequent by any measure say than in the 1970s, they don't appear to be withering away. They still remain an important weapon for employees to put pressures on their employers. Recently, in Britain strikes have become more popular in the public services, eg in rail services. Furthermore, with Tony Blair following to a large extent the free market ideology of Thatcher, less regulation for workers may mean workers feel a greater need for strikes over pay and conditions. In conclusion therefore, various causes of the reduction of strike levels have acted in combination. Economic pressures, the changing distribution of employment and organisation change within the firm exerted the most clear cut effects. Changes in the law may have had a less direct influence, though it is hard to disentangle their effects from wider political forces. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. Explain fully and clearly the importance of negotiation within industrial relations to resolve disputes

    The objectives are: > Negotiate with the government. > To make a stand via strike. The teachers went on strike on the 26th of November and also earlier this year in March. There is an example of this in Appendix 1.

  2. Employee Relations and Trade Union Recognition Within The Catering Sector.

    * Lack of industrial influence e.g. the ability of other trade unionist to paralyze society. * Lack of a union specifically catering for hotel workers needs. The workforce has little confidence in a union which does not seem to be tailored for their needs. They feel that the support is very limited and non specific.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    They tried not to buy new machinery or improve mines, as this would eat away at their profits. In 1920 mine owners told miners their wages would be reduced. The miners decided to go on a strike with the other members of the tripe alliance (the National Union of Railway Men and the Transport and General Workers Union).

  2. Select any ONE U.K.trade union. Explore their current levels of membership, and services for ...

    department within organisation during the 1990's. Evidence shows that the decline in trade union coincided with the increased development of the HRM practices and new forms of organisational work schemes, Guest (1989) concluded, "that HRM is incompatible with pluralist industrial relations"8.

  1. Describe and analyse the key developments in British industrial relations over the past 20 ...

    In 1984 the most powerful and most militant union went on strike. It was the miners union led by a Marxist, Arthur Scargill. Thatcher had predicted and prepared for the strike; by stockpiling coal at power stations and so the effects of the strike on the economy were minimised.

  2. "Management strategy towards collective bargaining is now characterised by decentralisation and flexibility" Discuss.

    Firms have tried to internalise employee management and foster internal labour markets to create systemic loyalty and performance through career trajectories and time related perks. Decentralisation it is argued enables management to be flexible to firm specific needs. Management can therefore have greater control on their costs and can tie

  1. Conflict at work: Industrial Disputes

    This way, the Police Federation is content and furthermore doesn't require any more financial input on the Home Secretary's part. This dispute sees no side of the battle on the winning team. The Home Office are livid at the fact that the Police Federation have slapped them in the face

  2. What were the main effects of the 1979-1997 Conservative governments’ reforms to collective ...

    Membership of trade unions was, it can now be see, at an all time high. However, all this was to change once the Conservatives came to power under Margaret Thatcher in 1979. According to Farnham, (1999, p215) "...[the change in State policy] had considerable implications for public policy on employee

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work