• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the rejection of the "democratic experiment" by the independent Southeast Asia states.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Account for the rejection of the "democratic experiment" by the independent Southeast Asia states. Throughout the Southeast Asian region, a wide range of political doctrines, compromises and institutions were tried, modified, rejected or opposed by the governments of Southeast Asia. Although democracy was adopted by many governments in the 1940s and early 1950s, with the exception of Malaysia and Singapore, it could be noted that most Southeast Asian states had made the gradual shift to authoritarianism by the end of 1980s. This therefore indicated the rejection of the democratic experiment. This rejection could be mainly attributed to the incompetence of democratic leaders, pre-colonial political system that favoured collective institutions and to the rise of military regimes. This essay aims to examine the reasons why democracy failed in Southeast Asia by first examining how the incompetence of democratic leaders had largely contributed to the eventual collapse of democracy; then it will go on to examine the challenges faced by democratic leaders; how pre-colonial political systems that favoured collective institutions made it difficult for democracy to thrive in Southeast Asia; as well as how many Southeast Asian countries succumbed to the imposition of military regimes justified in the name of national interest had all led to the rejection of democracy. ...read more.

Middle

Sukarno's playboy lifestyle gave him a collection of diseases, causing him to age rapidly. In 1965, Sukarno faltered in the middle of a speech and had to be helped from the platform before the eyes of shocked thousands. The display of weakness by the Sukarno gave rise to the rebellion of many, and the military had to intervene several times. Gradually, people no longer support democracy as much as respect for the military leaders who were quick to put down any dissent. Furthermore the governments that faced unfavourable circumstances such as challenges to central authority including ideological differences, communist and ethnic insurgencies were generally unsuccessful in implementing democracy in their countries. The limited amount of unity that was shown while the Indonesians were fighting the Dutch disappeared after the war was replaced by petty bickering between political factions. Some were divided along the religious lines between those who wanted an Islamic state and secular state. Between 1949 and March 1957 there were seven governments each trying to maintain internal security and develop the economy; this eventually paved the way for Suharto, a military general to stage a coup to take over from Sukarno and implement an authoritarian regime. In Burma, opponents of the U Nu regime rose up everywhere starting with two communist factions. ...read more.

Conclusion

When the liberal democratic governments failed to provide political stability and economic growth, the military, which have been lurking in the background for some time after independence, pounced to the front to assume political control. However, not all states rejected democracy as noted in Malaya and Singapore, where ethnic issues and communist threats were dealt with before given independence, which thrived under democracy. When Malaya was given independence in 1957, the country was almost free from communist influence except some communist guerrilla fighters in the Thai-Malaya border. When emergency was over in 1960, the country was firmly in the hands of the alliance party, a coalition government dominated by the united Malay national organization (UMNO), Malayan Chinese party (MCP) and the Malaya Indian congress (MIC). Similarly in Singapore, the communist influence was reduced to the minimum after operation Coldstore in 1963 before Singapore merged with Malaysia. The 1964 racial riots were also effectively dealt with before Singapore gained independence from Malaysia in 1965. In countries where the communist threat and ethnic insurgencies were prevalent, democracy would usually not survive for long after independence as the governments were usually fighting hard against these forces besides pushing back the military, which harboured the ambition of taking over the civilian governments. On the other hand, democracy usually work best in countries like Singapore and Malaysia, where these divisive issues were settled by the colonial master before they were given independence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    is that of a Western man saving an Indian widow from the pyre. This combines civilised morality and ideals of courage with a dark undercurrent of sexual longing which sums up the contradictions of the stereotype. Another crucial incidence of doubleness is perhaps the opening to hybridity itself.

  2. Democracy in Colonial Wethersfield, Connecticut

    According to Document M, their legal process was moving more towards a Democratic way. By having a Company of men deciding on the decisions of the wrongdoings in the town based on their majority vote. Their actions seem fair to the majority but yet there still remains that biased feelings

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    They were direct democracies, in which all citizens could speak and vote in assemblies that resembled New England town meetings. Representative government was unknown and unnecessary because of the small size of the city-states (almost never more than 10,000 citizens).

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    force in a democratic city-state where he could reach the masses sitting in the assembly. The weakening of the Council gave strength to such men. Hence we see that soon Athens was supporting the democracy at home by enforcing tyranny on her allies.

  1. Nigeria Country Study

    Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, when regarding the relationship between citizens and state, the interests of the rulers and the dominant economic class are paramount. Therefore, enforcement of the laws and maintenance of social order, which promote the interests of the rulers to the detriment of the majority of the

  2. Are democracies more likely to be peaceful than authoritarian states?

    Newly motivated work forces easily meet their production goals. If the leader of a dictatorship is a competent one the country can rise to hold a great amount of international power, as demonstrated by the Soviet Union. Building up the military is an important step to gain power.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    "The first attribute of the sovereign prince therefore is the power to make law binding on all his subjects in general and on each in particular. But to avoid any ambiguity one must add that he does so without the consent of any...All the other attributes and rights of sovereignty

  2. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    In this sense, by embracing the notion of grand coalition, consociationalism can be said to be 'democratic'15. There is, however, evidence to suggest that in practice the principle of 'grand coalition' does not adhere closely to the benchmarks of democracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work