• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Advantages of a FPTP system.

Extracts from this document...


Asses the advantages and disadvantages of the "first past the post" system of voting. "First past the post" also known as FPTP is the main system of voting in the United Kingdom, used in both general elections and local elections. It works on the basic principle of "plurality", in essence, whoever has the most votes wins, meaning no clear majority is needed. The electorate vote for their choice on MP in their constituency, and after the votes have been counted, a single elected MP will emerge the winner and represent that whole constituency in the House of Commons. However, as with most political systems and theories, it has its clear advantages and disadvantages, as will be explored in this answer. Perhaps its most distinct advantage is its unambiguous simplicity. It is easy to understand and operate. The ballot paper is simple, the people voting only vote once for a single candidate, and thus party, and the subsequent counting of votes is relatively straightforward compared to other alternatives. It also leads to a fairly clear outcome of the election, as the candidate with the most votes secures their particular constituency, and thus the party with the most seats the majority in parliament, and so form the government. ...read more.


The single member constituencies used in UK general elections improve the effective representation of the electorate. One member of parliament is responsible for representing the interests of a single constituency area and all the people within its boundaries. This can lead to a strong bond between MP's and their constituents, which perhaps would not be the case with other multimember seats. It creates a clear single "leader" of that constituency, and whom the constituents know to go to. If there were multiple representatives within a single constituency, the public may not know who to go to in what circumstances, and the roles of the individual representatives becomes blurred. This also encourages MP's to act on behalf of all their constituents rather than on a narrow party line. However, it can easily be argued that the first past the post system of voting is seriously flawed, as following. The principle argument against this style of voting, is perhaps the simplest, it's unfair. The number of seats a party wins is not representatives of the number of votes it receives. ...read more.


This problem also leads to the issue of "safe seats" and thus "wasted votes". In a constituency where a party has such a substantial lead over its nearest rival that there is nigh on no chance of it loosing at the next election, then there is practically no point in people who would vote for the opposition even voting, and none of those votes would eventually count in the long run. Many voters have a constituency MP who is not a member of their chosen political party. This raises the questions about the representation of the views of these votes both at local levels, and in the house of commons and central government. Another significant problem with FPTP is that it allows only 1 candidate per party per constituency, leading to a fairly limited choice of representation. For example a labour voter may have to vote for the just the official labour candidate in that constituency even if it may not be the voters first choice. In a multi-member constituency they would thus be able to express a preference of all the parties on offer, and then a specific preference within that party, allowing voters to choose from the right and left of that party, aswell as gender, ethnicity and qualifications etc. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Democracy and Voting

    * If a candidate receives an absolute majority of votes (50% + 1) he/she would be elected. * However if no single candidate gets more than 50%, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is "eliminated" from the count, and their ballot examined for their second preferences.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    The answer is almost certainly yes, as the people deserve to know the facts about the people who their taxes are paying for, just as the people deserve to know about those who commit crimes, and those who commit benefit fraud in particular, which is another big paper seller.

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    There is a 'winner's bonus' which is a small increase in the votes of the winning party, translated into a certain percentage of seats which they are awarded when they become the new Government. This is demonstrated in 1983 when the Conservatives gained a one hundred seat majority on only

  2. Electoral Systems.

    Due to the reduction in security of tenure brought about by STV, all MPs will need to win their seats on merit. Voters also tend to feel a natural link with the whole of Leeds, for example, rather than an allegiance to Leeds North or Leeds Central.

  1. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    I feel my timing and organisation skills let me down on this task, and is something I looked to correct for the other documents that I produced. What would I do differently if I had to do a similar task in the future As mentioned I would look to rectify

  2. Assess the extent to which the 2010 election illustrated the advantages and disadvantages of ...

    Generally the results of elections using FPTP can be calculated quickly. When necessary, this makes the transfer of power from one party to another much easier. Also, a valid vote requires only one mark beside the name or symbol of one candidate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work