Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

America Liberalism

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

America Liberalism The United States of America is known throughout the world as the benchmark of a free society. America believes in a complex philosophy of liberalism. The question is where did this complex idea come from? Well one idea is that it was inherited from the early settlers of the American Colonies and it has been transforming ever since and is now the form we see today. My purpose is to prove to an audience that Puritan Theology and culture, Anti-Federalist arguments, and Federalist political thought, have all been profound influences on this idea of liberalism. "By liberalism we mean that Americans tend to look first to the individual as the source of value rather than to an imposed dogmatic creed or hierarchy" (American Political Thinking). According to the way we look at liberalism in America today, there are two strands of it. The first strand is called "Classical Liberalism." This is the idea that peoples' property rights, their protection and a free economic market are more important than human welfare. For quite a long time, this was the only type of liberalism there was, until many people began to think that human rights were more important than any economic prosperity derived from free enterprise. This change in thought is called the progressive movement. This movement was created by a rise in the great concentrations of urban wealth. This movement was in opposition to the Laizze Fair attitudes of the classical liberals. They did not see the poor as being poor because they were stupid, lazy or inferior, but rather because of an unfair social and economic system.

Middle

The Federalists were the driving force of people behind the creation of the Constitution and perhaps they felt a need to create this document because they saw a need to regulate and create a government for a liberal society that needed more authority and structure. Although this may have been a good idea for a newborn country, some believe it still goes against true liberal notions, because it takes power and freedom away from the people and puts it in the hands of the government. "The federalist design for the U. S. Constitution was a negative one geared toward preventing evils from occurring rather than a positive one geared toward establishing a democratic utopia" (American Political Thinking). However, you may look at it as though the balance of authority and freedom in America today was set by the standard put forth by the Constitution and the Federalists ideology, which is very deeply imbedded with liberalism. Alexander Hamilton, who was one of the major contributors to the Constitution and the writer of a large portion of the Federalist papers, said, "Money is the vital and principal of the body of politic," (American Political Thinking). He was a Federalist that wanted to use the Constitution to form a financial aristocracy in the United States. "Hamilton envisioned a strong government by 'the wise, the good, and the rich,' a dynamic, centralized form of aristocracy that would strive for industrial financial power," (American Political Thinking). Even though it seems as if Hamilton saw that the United States was not to be an agrarian state like so many thought, his ideas of an aristocracy provide an alternative to the ideas of the liberal society that has been described.

Conclusion

The main thing that Puritans, Federalists and Anti-Federalists have in common is that they are all American. Now that the obvious has been stated, observe how they all have contributed in different ways to the ideology of American political thought. The Puritans theology forced them to think a certain way. They wanted to live and thrive in a virtuous society and needed to live a life that would be successful so that they could discover that they were one of the chosen elite. They wished everyone would worship as they did; however their religion was never impressed on those who did not seek it. They gave us the notions of toleration for all people and an ambition to live the good life. The Federalists provided America with the idea of a big government, and with that they gave us free commerce, freedom from tyranny, and the notion that all men are created equal. No matter your ethnic background or religious preference, you'll have the same freedom to make anything you want of yourself. The Anti-Federalist gave society what the Federalists left out. They exemplified the people's rights, defined them and said that no matter what; no body of government or person could take these rights away. They gave the people the power over the government and made sure that the public was able to govern themselves. Freedom can be defined as the saying, that "I will stand there and listen to a man insult me and degrade my ideas while expressing his opinion, for I have the freedom to express my own." It is truly amazing that all these different ideas came together at once to create this fabulous nation and a very unique way of understanding liberty, freedom, and justice for all, under the theory of American liberalism. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    This is different from social equality, which liberals view as undesirable as people are different and have varying talents and skills, and should be rewarded for merit with the incentive of reaching one's 'full potential'. The result is a meritocracy based on both people's ability and luck; people are judged on "the content of their character" (Martin Luther King).

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    How can Locke's universally known theory be applied to each person? The answer to this question is that Locke's theory of property can not incorporate each person into it's meaning. The information that Locke wrote applied to the sixteenth century.

  1. In what sense(s) can liberalism be regarded as individualistic? Should individualism be regarded as ...

    However, there are arguments to suggest that it is in fact, a weakness of liberalism. Perhaps the largest flaw in the individualism theory is that it is based on rational individuals as touched on by Barbara Goodwin, "the individual is assumed to be rational"4 There is a large percent of

  2. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    the system before the theory of meritocracy should be applied and that social inequality should exist only if it works to the benefit of the poorest members of society. In contrast to classical liberals, modern liberal thinkers believe capitalism only worsened class inequalities within society.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    Remember, according to Mill's theory of rights, people don't have any rights aside from those granted by society, so people never give up their right to the money taken in taxes, they never had the right to it in the first place.

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments. Locke is thus also important for his defense of the right of revolution.

  1. In what sense(s) can liberalism be regarded as individualistic? Should individualism be regarded as ...

    This definition of individualism is consistent with classical liberalism. Each person is their own sovereign in a social and political context. Subjects in a classical liberal society are to be seen to have a moral nature with ultimate control over their own life.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    They were impoverished, either tilling the land of the aristocrats and paying them a sixth of the produce (sharecroppers) or farming their own land. Those who farmed their own land were the worst off. They owned very little as the few aristocrats owned most of the fertile land of the plains.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.