• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

America Liberalism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

America Liberalism The United States of America is known throughout the world as the benchmark of a free society. America believes in a complex philosophy of liberalism. The question is where did this complex idea come from? Well one idea is that it was inherited from the early settlers of the American Colonies and it has been transforming ever since and is now the form we see today. My purpose is to prove to an audience that Puritan Theology and culture, Anti-Federalist arguments, and Federalist political thought, have all been profound influences on this idea of liberalism. "By liberalism we mean that Americans tend to look first to the individual as the source of value rather than to an imposed dogmatic creed or hierarchy" (American Political Thinking). According to the way we look at liberalism in America today, there are two strands of it. The first strand is called "Classical Liberalism." This is the idea that peoples' property rights, their protection and a free economic market are more important than human welfare. For quite a long time, this was the only type of liberalism there was, until many people began to think that human rights were more important than any economic prosperity derived from free enterprise. This change in thought is called the progressive movement. This movement was created by a rise in the great concentrations of urban wealth. This movement was in opposition to the Laizze Fair attitudes of the classical liberals. They did not see the poor as being poor because they were stupid, lazy or inferior, but rather because of an unfair social and economic system. ...read more.

Middle

The Federalists were the driving force of people behind the creation of the Constitution and perhaps they felt a need to create this document because they saw a need to regulate and create a government for a liberal society that needed more authority and structure. Although this may have been a good idea for a newborn country, some believe it still goes against true liberal notions, because it takes power and freedom away from the people and puts it in the hands of the government. "The federalist design for the U. S. Constitution was a negative one geared toward preventing evils from occurring rather than a positive one geared toward establishing a democratic utopia" (American Political Thinking). However, you may look at it as though the balance of authority and freedom in America today was set by the standard put forth by the Constitution and the Federalists ideology, which is very deeply imbedded with liberalism. Alexander Hamilton, who was one of the major contributors to the Constitution and the writer of a large portion of the Federalist papers, said, "Money is the vital and principal of the body of politic," (American Political Thinking). He was a Federalist that wanted to use the Constitution to form a financial aristocracy in the United States. "Hamilton envisioned a strong government by 'the wise, the good, and the rich,' a dynamic, centralized form of aristocracy that would strive for industrial financial power," (American Political Thinking). Even though it seems as if Hamilton saw that the United States was not to be an agrarian state like so many thought, his ideas of an aristocracy provide an alternative to the ideas of the liberal society that has been described. ...read more.

Conclusion

The main thing that Puritans, Federalists and Anti-Federalists have in common is that they are all American. Now that the obvious has been stated, observe how they all have contributed in different ways to the ideology of American political thought. The Puritans theology forced them to think a certain way. They wanted to live and thrive in a virtuous society and needed to live a life that would be successful so that they could discover that they were one of the chosen elite. They wished everyone would worship as they did; however their religion was never impressed on those who did not seek it. They gave us the notions of toleration for all people and an ambition to live the good life. The Federalists provided America with the idea of a big government, and with that they gave us free commerce, freedom from tyranny, and the notion that all men are created equal. No matter your ethnic background or religious preference, you'll have the same freedom to make anything you want of yourself. The Anti-Federalist gave society what the Federalists left out. They exemplified the people's rights, defined them and said that no matter what; no body of government or person could take these rights away. They gave the people the power over the government and made sure that the public was able to govern themselves. Freedom can be defined as the saying, that "I will stand there and listen to a man insult me and degrade my ideas while expressing his opinion, for I have the freedom to express my own." It is truly amazing that all these different ideas came together at once to create this fabulous nation and a very unique way of understanding liberty, freedom, and justice for all, under the theory of American liberalism. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    This is different from social equality, which liberals view as undesirable as people are different and have varying talents and skills, and should be rewarded for merit with the incentive of reaching one's 'full potential'. The result is a meritocracy based on both people's ability and luck; people are judged on "the content of their character" (Martin Luther King).

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The poll sends questionnaires only to parents that work. When Mr. Jones, CEO president, reads the question "How does working a night shift affect your child's life?" he is going to interpret it differently then Mrs.Smith, the librarian, when she reads it.

  1. Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

    French statesmen such as Francois Guizot and Adolphe Thiers expressed similar sentiments well into the 19th century. In Britain, the important Reform Act of 1867 did not completely abolish property qualifications for the right to vote.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    nor does the principle apply to others who require substantial care (e.g., the elderly, the mentally ill, or anyone whom we have objective evidence to believe is incapable of rational judgment). Children are the primary case, and Mill maintains that we are justified in compelling children in paternalistic ways. b)

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Liberalism places great emphasis on Individualism, Liberalism is based on individualism. To leave the individual to make up there own mind on most things, as opposed to a authoritarian leader doing so. There was a return to classical principles in the seventeenth century adopting principles such as constitutional government, individual rights and government by consent.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    Solon set himself to resolving this issue first by convincing the Alcmeonids to stand trial after which they were found guilty and exiled (Plutarch, Solon). Then he set to formulate laws in accordance with his doctrine of harmonious government. His aim was to provide stability not through sweeping reforms but

  1. Thomas Jefferson

    With Napoleon's signing of the secret Treaty of San Ildefonso of 1800 with Spain, France acquired the Louisiana Territory, more than half of whose population consisted of white Americans. By 1801, both parties agreed upon the necessity of acquiring New Orleans, the "Guardian of the Mississippi River," in order to

  2. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    He says that 'you should thank God for counting you worthy to suffer for the sake of his Word' but then states, 'if you do not resist him and let him take away your faith or your books, then you will truly have denied God.'6 He instructs individuals to say

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work