• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An 18th Century Strait-jacket - Is this a fair description of the Constitution?

Extracts from this document...


An 18th Century Strait-jacket. Is this a fair description of the Constitution? According to Ashford and Ashbee (1999), the system of: "checks and balances have created gridlock. Decisions cannot be made because there is insufficient agreement between institutions. In contrast with the countries of western Europe, the US has, [critics] argue, been unable to impose effective gun control or establish comprehensive health-care provision because decision making requires such a widely shared consensus." This gridlock is one of the reasons that some have come to call the US Constitution an "18th Century Strait-Jacket". Of course there are various sides to this argument that must be explored before a conclusion is reached. First, we must put this into its historical context. As a colony of the British Empire, the Americans had several grievances particularly with taxation with representation in the British Parliament, the quartering of soldiers in people's homes without permission and imprisonment without trial. ...read more.


While a literalist may believe that these people must support the Constitution on every occasion, others may suggest that while they should uphold the principles and rules of the Constitution, if they disagree with anything in the Constitution they have the right, from the 1st Amendment's "freedom of speech" guarantee, to make this public. Therefore, it can be argued that it is, in fact, the interpreters as opposed to the interpreted that makes the Constitution an "18th Century Strait-Jacket". Critics argue that the nature of the Constitution creates a situation whereby the Constitution acts as a 'Strait-Jacket', restricting Representatives getting on with their work but rather concentrating on upcoming elections. This is can be substantially evidenced as truth but perhaps overall it is an advantage. If the Representatives are constantly looking towards approaching elections they may become more 'in tune' with their mandate and give the people what they want rather than what he/she or their party thinks the people should want. ...read more.


By the 1960s - when the Vietnam War was fought - the president had undoubted primacy or hegemony in the handling of defence policy and national security matters." Hence, Arthur Schlesinger Jr described the 1960s as the era of the 'imperial presidency'. Ashbee and Ashford continued to demonstrate that "Congress - although sometimes vocal in its comments - played a subordinate role". Therefore, it can be said the Constitution is not as restricting as critics would lead us to believe because power has gradually evolved towards the President. It is important also to compare the US Constitution to other Constitution. The British Constitution most notably, is not codified or entrenched. It is much easier to change this Constitution - through an Act of Parliament, a court ruling or an EU law in comparison to the US, an amendment of which requires a 2/3 majority in both houses and the approval of 3/4 of the states. Nevertheless, while Britain may seem to have more 'power' over her country than the US's "18th Century Stait Jacket" ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    The people would then pay for these entitlements either directly to corporations or via taxes, which are then in turn sent to corporations. This is often called a "conservative" or "right-wing" economic policy. It is conservative because of the reduced influence of government.

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    Parliamentary sovereignty is slowly diminishing in the UK and a codified constitution would not only decrease government sovereignty, but also increase sovereignty of the electorate and the judicial system. Presently, if the government wanted to modify or add to the uncodified constitution, they can do it simply by passing an Act.

  1. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    In the same way, 2010 has seen a rise in popularity of the "Tea Party" within the Republican movement which wants to bring the party more to the right and return the USA to fundamental policies but again party strategists do not wish to lose votes from those who believe in market forces but do not hold extreme right-wing views.

  2. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    chief executive has the right to prevent particular provisions of a bill enacted by a legislative assembly from becoming law without having to kill all the other parts of the bill at the same time.

  1. The Australian Constitution is the ultimate law ruling in Australia

    Even with these powers, the state may find federal actions overriding them. Generally, the states are involved in some important social areas that are not likely to be seriously affected by federal activities. The include the basic civil law of the country relating to contracts, property and civil wrongs, such

  2. The British Constitution

    were continued and completed by Edward ?. When the Bill of Rights was passed in 1689, it specified that laws could only be made or repealed by Parliament and not by the Monarch alone. Parliament has gradually taken control over many of the powers previously exercised by the Monarch.

  1. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    dispute and allowing the task of government to continue.[9]?This was clearly a very political decision, despite the fact it was a more restrained court, which proves that even the judicially restrained courts still act as politicians, as the Supreme Courts role was similar to the House of Representatives role in

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    An important aspect of the separation of powers was to give each of the branches a noticeably diverse constituency, or community. Federalism was a ?step toward greater centralization of power? (We the People). It created two rulers, the nation and the states, hoping the rivalry would limit power for both groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work