• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"An emphasis upon the differences between the UK and US constitutions neglects their more fundamental similarities" Discuss

Extracts from this document...


"An emphasis upon the differences between the UK and US constitutions neglects their more fundamental similarities" Discuss The question requires us to see the difference between the UK and US constitutions of the political systems and then analyse whether there is actually a difference between the two. Constitution specifies the powers of the state and the institutions or offices, which have and excise state power. "A state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory" (Max Weber). There are two types of constitutions negative constitutions which goes beyond principles that are beyond people's wishes this is common in the US constitution. Whereas the positive constitution is an example of the British constitutions constructed so that public wishes are kept. ...read more.


Whereas in the UK the local government don't have a lot of control they just merely follow the Westminster rules. The new assembled Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and Greater London Assembly have been very little power by the Westminister compared to American states. However "The unitary state was challenged by the creation of elected assemblies in Scotland,Wales and Northern Ireland.In Scotland,the new Parliament was given power to legislate on nay matter resrved by the UK parliament"[1].Shows that they are different however the Britain is moving to being a federal state for example the Scottish Parliament can start to decide its standard rate of tax. The American constitution consists of a Bill of Rights which compromises of 10 amendments in 1971 which gives its citizens the freedom of speech, press and religion where as Britain has no Bill of Rights. ...read more.


The British constutution is made of statue law,common law and EU trieties and legislation and others.However the American consitution has chaged over 17th century and recently due to the deducation in states which has changed to 13 states.The US constitution was an orginal document of 4,000 word plus had 27 amendments. Another difference between the two consitutions is that America is an republic consitution and therfore as stated in the consitution no politicans can be accepted from abroad without the permission of the Congress(i.e Arnold Schwarzenegger cant stand up for presenditial elctions because he is from abroad).Whereas in the UK the Queens role is to pass the law and in the House of Lords which is ,ade up of peers and Lords mainly from certain welthy brackgrounds.Since Blair came into power he changed the second chamber which left 91 Lords however its bias because they were choosen by collagues.Britain take more into account elections and discredits soversighnty and Bill of Rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    In the US this is not allowed. In a parliamentary system, parliament is accountable to the people. The executive is accountable to parliament so ultimately the executive is accountable to the legislature even though the executive holds dominance over the legislature (majority party form government and executive drawn from legislature).

  2. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    power of the Government > To establish the rights of the citizens > To define the nature of citizenship > To define the territory governed by the constitution > To define relationships with external bodies > To establish how the constitution itself can be amended Typical constitutional features are >

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    There is little challenge to the existing constitution here. The Presiding Officer of the Welsh Assembly, Lord Elis-Thompson, identifies the move to devolution as follows: 'We are at the beginning of the end of the old constitution' (Hazell et al., 2001, 191).

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    criminal code defines torture as "specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering" and subsequently as causing "intense, lasting and heinous agony". It also describes mental pain as "prolonged mental harm". It also prohibits: inflicting or threatening to inflict severe pain or suffering, sing or threatening to

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    The UK constitution also exists in common law which has developed through tradition and custom over time; royal prerogative, which were powers originally exercised by the monarch; various conventions; authoritative works and political literature written by constitutionalists A V Dicey and Walter Bagehot, and more recently EU law.

  2. The British Constitution

    member of the process as he is the Speaker in the House of Lords. Although they all perform separate functions, there is no strict separation, such as in the United States. In contrast to the evolution of The British Constitution, The Constitution of the United States of America comes from revolutionary times.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    At least the US Supreme court may triumphantly declare how ethnically diverse it is, which may influence how representative the court is in conveying an appreciation of the law. However one has to determine how genuine these appointments are. Is ethnicity being considered for the sake of ethnicity or for politics?

  2. Recent reforms have brought the UK and US closer constitutionally. Discuss.

    Although this seems like a late reform in comparison to the US, who released an equivalent act in 1966 (FIOA), we must remember that freedom of information was not of the ?four freedoms? which formed the foundation of the European Union and therefore the UK is advanced in some respects.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work