• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are Civil Liberties and rights better Protected In the US or UK?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Are Civil Liberties and rights better Protected In the US or UK Jacob Murphy \zCivil Rights and Liberties are a basic necessity of rules and rights that protect citizens and give freedom to promote such issues as right to a fair trial and basic rights as the right to life in which isn?t promoted in such countries as Saudi Arabia and many authoritative countries .There?s several ways in which citizens of rights are protected from country to country such as the Supreme Court , the constitution and the Judiciary .The USA is better protected as the constitution sets out rigid guidelines in which can be followed and enforced. Judicial interpretation is the most important in protecting civil rights and liberties in which is influenced by the composition of the Supreme Court. This is crucial as land mark decisions can be influenced and sort out potential rulings in future cases. This is as in such landmark cases civil rights and liberties haven?t been protected or may not of been the decision Which would of best protected the citizen. This is as the supreme court in the USA is elected through executive bodies in which determine which candidates would be best due to political leaning with the same could be said with the appointments of judges by the JAC. ...read more.


In Britain there is legislation in which makes the British citizen weary as legislation in Britain can be changed as no government is restricted by previous legislation a case of civil liberties and rights not being protected in the Uk is the case in which Iain Duncan Smith's department has introduced legislation to 'protect the national economy' from a £130m payout to jobseekers. This was retrospective legislation in which went against the civil rights and liberties of the people as the government changed the law to suits itself so they didn’t have to pay out. This questions the accountability of the British Executive as even nations that violate human rights and liberties such as Iran and Turkey have it written into there constitutions banning retrospective legislation questioning the fairness and the rights of the citizens as a an act which may not be a crime now could cause a person to be accused of crime as retrospective legislation should not be so manipulative in deciding the outcome to protect the government. Civil Rights and liberties are sometimes not protected due to the influence held by the consummate courts in which gives little precedence to either state courts in what happens this is ...read more.


Even though this case was overturned this then invalidates the 10th amendment in which powers should not be delegated to the United States by the constitution. Validating the point that some civil liberties and rights aren?t protected by the supreme court but influenced to suit the courts standing on particular idea due to the ideology and position in which the court stands for. Showing that the supreme court is unconstitutional in its own right and overturn potentially right hearings. Overall I have found that analyzing and distinguishing between both sides of the argument that the UK?s civil right and liberties are loosely protected and don?t offer real protection with constant change and manipulation in law to such government .While also the British law takes 2nd preference to EU law by weakening the powers and decisions of judges have on the UK due to strict regulations .This is as the USAs constitution and superior body enforces the protection of Civil Rights/Liberties and it?s not until other authoritative Bodies step in and enforce the civil rights and liberties that the UK can protect them better in which shows the UK has to be pushed to enforce civil rights and liberties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    To change the constitution it is necessary to have a supermajority of 2/3 or 3/4, which is required in both chambers of the bicameral legislature to create a successful amendment. An example of a failed attempt would be the Balanced Budget Amendment (1995)

  2. To what extend are rights and liberties better protected in theory than in practice ...

    and the Million Man March in Washington DC (1995). Furthermore, in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Board of Education (1971), the court extended the ban on segregated schools from de jure segregation to de facto segregation which led to the introduction of school busing programmes to provide racially mixed schools in all areas.

  1. Discuss the view that a Bill of rights alone is insufficient to protect rights ...

    Again, the case of Bowyers v. Hardwick indentifies the conservative bias of the court that fails to protect the rights of homosexuals. A Bill of Rights effectively turns judges into policy-makers. This is clearly evident in the USA, where rights of such groups as women, racial minorities and arrested people have been the subject of important Supreme Court decisions.

  2. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    In the 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case, several students who were punished for wearing black arm-bands to school in protest against the Vietnam War, were able to look to the first amendment for protection. The Supreme Court ruled that freedom of expression rights extended to

  1. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    dispute and allowing the task of government to continue.[9]?This was clearly a very political decision, despite the fact it was a more restrained court, which proves that even the judicially restrained courts still act as politicians, as the Supreme Courts role was similar to the House of Representatives role in

  2. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    Advocacy groups politicise the process too. The National Abortion Rights Action League and the National Organization for Women sought to challenge Bork?s nomination. Even a television advertising campaign was mounted against his nomination, costing around $15 million[20]. Furthermore In 2006 the Washington Post reported that over a 3 month period of the nomination debate concerning Samuel

  1. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    They argue that the constitution is too flexible and complain that it has allowed the government, especially the executive branch, to use periods of crisis to steadily undermine those mechanisms in the constitution which protect liberty, which should protect citizens from the accumulation of power by the national government.

  2. Recent reforms have brought the UK and US closer constitutionally. Discuss.

    Therefore, although the UK upper chamber is slowly evolving to enhance its legitimacy, it is still far from the US Senate. The final reason for why the UK system resembles the US due to recent constitutional reform the changing role of the Prime Minister (PM).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work