• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are democracies more likely to be peaceful than authoritarian states?

Extracts from this document...


Are democracies more likely to be peaceful than authoritarian states? To answer this question we first need to define and contrast the two different types of state. An authoritarian state is one that enforces a policy of strict obedience, compliance and may use tyrannical and domineering measures to obtain this. A vote system may be in operation but any dissenting section of the population may come under threat from the government in control thus making the vote a mere stage show. Unlike the above a democratic state sees individual freedom as paramount to the success of a capitalist democracy, which has a system of government influenced by the whole population via the use of representatives. We assume the word peaceful used in this context is the opposite of war but war is the most extreme consequence of the bad reaction between two or more states. Actions of other states may cause another to experience civil unrest, civil panic and changes in legislation; most commonly an occurrence in democratic states as seen in light of 9/11, which I will discuss later on in the essay. 1945 and the end of World War II was a significant turning point with regards to peace between democratic states. Before 1945 'The League of Nations' was an attempt to avoid conflict like the Great War from recurring. ...read more.


The present day UN can be seen as a more successful version of the League of Nations. It seems that democracies are constantly striving after peace but in turn is this making their states less peaceful? In the year 2000 the UN had 189 members and one of its main objectives stated in the UN charter was to "Maintain international peace and security....promoting and encouraging respect for human rights...". By no means is the UN ever seen as the aggressor, rather the international police force that deals with breaches of human rights on a large scale or tries to prevent usually authoritarian states from warring. This coalition of what are now hundreds of democratic countries must reveal that at the core democratic states are more peaceful. Maybe democracies have come to see that negotiation and deliberation over difficult international disputes is a far better and cost effective way of resolving them as opposed to war and oppression. However not all authoritarian states enact a policy of genocide on a section of their population; some states have had authoritarian rule and it has improved the state of the country. Democracy is not always a sure thing. Collapsing democracies tend to show great national fervour, for example Cuba; its democratic collapse sparking one of the greatest crisis of the Cold War. These types of states often occur when a nation is economically and politically unstable. ...read more.


Almost 3 million US men and women were sent thousands of miles to fight and on both sides over 2 million were killed. It was America's fear and paranoia that the world would 'fall' to communism that it took radical action to try and halt it (domino theory). For a time this paranoia turned America into an aggressive democratic state internationally and we may be seeing this happening again with the unrest in the Middle East. In the Global society that we live in it is hard for a state to isolate itself. Democratic governments are more likely to favour free trade and beneficial trade agreements with other states. To maintain fluent and fair trade international peace is very important and it may become increasingly hard for authoritarian states to trade successfully with democratic states if they are violating human rights. If every state were a democracy then ideally there would be general peace. Immanuel Kant, the great German philosopher, predicted in 1795 that a world of democracies would create what he called "perpetual peace."2 But while authoritarian states that are fundamentally hostile and are not striving for peace exist, especially those who violate international law and oppress their citizens, democratic states will struggle to be peaceful. 1 Maters, Roger D. 1989. The Nature of Politics. New Have, CT: Yale University Press 2 Arnold Beichman: fellow at the Hoover institution. Taken from his writing on Political Democracies Paul Charles Gaffney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Kelly's theory is often described as cognitive, with the majority of its emphasis on the construction of thought (Jancowicz, 1987). Many people have mentioned this as their primary criticism of Kelly's theory, when in fact; Kelly disliked being called a cognitive theorist (Maddi, 1996).

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Two additional characteristics relating to autonomy are worth noting. First, not only the goals of these organizations may not only be dictated from the outside, they may also be dependent on other external bodies to achieve them. Lawmakers need the executive branch, as do the courts, to have their policies enforced.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    To argue from the other side, the word freedom could be linked to democracy in that those who are free would have democracy as their form of government, because to have total freedom would be anarchy, which would include freedom to limit the freedom of others, and the next logical

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    This was particularly true for those to the right of the political spectrum. This feeling was not, however, caused by the Affair. Anti-Semitism was already an underlying feeling possessed by those on the right. It was a natural extension of their Nationalistic views.

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    as Great Britain and France on the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914 and as recently as 1954, the United States secretly supported an armed raid that brought down the democratically elected government of Guatemala. Supporters of the "democratic peace" theory have argued that the examples of wars used

  2. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    One of these examples is the Ku-Klux Klan. This group originally appeared after the US Civil War. When the North won the war against the South over slavery and economic issues. Black Americans were given equal political and civil status.

  1. Legacies of the totalitarian system and the political transformation of Romanian society after 1989.

    One after the other throughout Romanian history of communism the illusions of equality, fraternity, and prosperity faded away. Marxist-Leninists believe that what is important is not periodic elections, but the class interest represented by the political actors who are in power.

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    in its relations with other states, became not only the typical modern political institution but also the most powerful institution in modern society. (b) Jean Bodin In 1576, Jean Bodin published a work entitled Six livres de la re'publique which was written with the purpose of strengthening the king.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work