• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are pressure groups a threat to the democratic process in the United Kingdom?

Extracts from this document...


Are pressure groups a threat to the democratic process in the United Kingdom? Pressure groups, are un-elected by the general public, yet they are a part of the political, and some could argue, the democratic process in the United Kingdom. Pressure groups are normally single-issue groups, or they claim to represent the interest of a section of society or organisations. Political parties by their very nature cannot hope to be experts on all areas of policy and issues, and therefore they have to consult with think tanks and/or pressure groups. For instance, whilst considering their policies on the environment, a political party may ask the views and opinions of the RSPB, friends of the Earth, Green peace or a particular university or think-tank. Pressure groups exist to influence government policy over the area or areas that concern that pressure group. There are two main systems that can exist where pressure groups are concerned. These are pluralism and corporatism. British pressure groups fit in a the description of a Liberal sub-group of corporatism, there being a mixture of groups that have weak or no links to government and themselves (these tend to be groups such as the Animal Liberation front, and other, more radical environmental groups) and interest groups such as trade unions and the CBI. The position of pressure groups in the democratic process within the United Kingdom is intriguing. ...read more.


or attending meetings, be they public or group meetings, and demonstrations. The effective groups normally have a committed membership, that is ready and eager to expand, and so be a mixture of the two types of membership. A group's access to government is another important influence on the effectiveness of pressure groups, they seek to change the situation in the country, be it social or political, however, both normally can only be rectified by working with or persuading the government, access is critical, if the government chooses to ignore a pressure group, it is very hard, but not impossible to effect change and influence. The organisation of pressure groups is crucial, if they have a corporate structure; it is more flexible and able to change position in the face of a rapidly changing situation. Whereas pressure groups whose decision making process is membership based, means that the group can't be as flexible, but it can claim to represent the views of its membership. Having professionals, such as leading scientists, doctors, civil servants, captains of industry, the aristocracy, and MPs as prominent members of a pressure group, can increase its standing in the eyes of the public and those in power. Resources is key to any pressure groups effectiveness, if they have a large amount of money as a result of donations, they can take their campaigning to a national or even international level. ...read more.


Thus it can be argued that the will of the majority is by-passed by the ability of pressure groups to influence the political system. This process can be seen as anti-democratic, and the will of the majority may be abandoned in order to please pressure groups. A pluralistic view of pressure groups sees them as enhancing the democratic process. Pressure groups, it is argued, supply useful information for the government, keep it aware of the wishes of the people, and enhance the liberal democratic principles of political competion, with the result that a tolerant and open socitety will be created where an over-riding objective is the establishment of widespread concensus. The competion between pressure groups, it is argued, ensures that no permannet minority is created. The assumption is that the total of the opinions expressed by pressure groups, expresses the total of public opinion. The number of conflicting voices that reach the government may seem endless, but, in terms of a pluralistic rather than a coporatist system, it is still the government that has to decide between the competing groups and that has the final say over decision making. Pressure groups are an integral part of the polictal process in the untied kingdom, and the encorage public participation and the ability to freely express opinions and views, features of a democratic process, it would be unwise to say that they are a threat to the democratic process, since it was the democratic process that created them. Paul Frame 12 LQM. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Pressure groups revision - short questions and answers.

    E.g. Shami Chakrabati, Liberty * Popular support - the more people, greater the political influence generally. However, Stop The War campaign marches in 2003 failed. Governments measure by how much electoral damage caused by NOT acceding to demands * Effectiveness of opposition - groups invariably clash with others, e.g.

  2. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    small channel of views being taken on board, which is contradictory to democratic process. So whilst there are currently around 15,000 Brussels-based lobbyists (consultants, lawyers, associations, corporations, NGOs etc.) and around 2,600 special interest groups have a permanent office in Brussels seeking to influence the policy of the European Union, there are undoubtedly groups that have greater influence than others.

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    Insider groups "abide by the political rules of the game to obtain better access to government and therefore have more chances of achieving their objectives"2 For a group to gain insider status, not only do they need to want it, the government have to grant them it.

  2. 'The existence of pressure groups makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    They provide functional representation according to occupation and belief. They apply scrutiny to governmental activity whilst publicising poor practise. Media campaigns also raise public awareness of agendas within government, allowing for continuous representation between elections therefore enhancing the level of participation. Consequently democratically elected governments are seen as more effective both from the inside and outside.

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    The same happened with smoking and its harm to people's organism. It took a long time for scientists from Oxford University to prove, that those 'little soldiers of death' (cigarettes) do actually kill. But before it happened the majority of people thought that the threat to cigarette-smoker's health was exaggerated

  2. How do British Pressure groups exert influence?

    the information and advice provided by groups helps to improve the quality of government policy and legislation. They are a product of freedom of association, which is a fundamental principle of liberal democracy. Freely operating pressure groups are essential to the effective functioning of liberal democracy in three main ways:

  1. LESSON 1: Pressure Groups

    LESSON 4: Pressure Groups and the EU 14. If I were asked to organise a campaign at EU level there are several tactics I would use. I would definitely try and have a permanent presence in Brussels. This is because of the unpredictability of when a draft directive may be

  2. Do you consider the political activities of organised groups (pressure groups) to enhance or ...

    According to the pluralist model power is exercised by the mass of the population, rather than by a small elite group. Pluralists note that if the people do not like what government or those representing them are doing they can vote for an alternative option and remove them from office at the next election.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work