• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are pressure groups good for democracy?

Extracts from this document...


Are pressure groups good for democracy? There are many differing views on the role of the pressure group within the modern liberal democracy. Some political commentators claim that pressure groups led to an imbalance of democracy or a democratic deficit, because people who are members of pressure groups receive more of a political voice than those ordinary members of society whose access to democracy is their vote during elections. The opposite f this is the opinion which claims that pressure groups are not a form of democratic deficit but merely a way of the public getting its opinions herd and a form of communication between public and government. I am now going to analyse the pluralist model, and begin by answering the question what is a pluralist? Pluralists uphold the principle that political power in a liberal democracy is widely distributed, that continual competition between groups and that new groups constantly emerge. The pluralist would claim that the pressure group system is good for democracy as it allows people access to politics all the time as opposed to once every 4 years when an election is held. ...read more.


It is more likely that a pressure group will be ignored by government than listened to. Secondly pressure groups are not representative of the public, and often their members, this is because many groups do not have procedures for consulting their members. Thirdly because of the wide range of pressure groups different groups exert different amounts of pressure on decision makers therefore it is impractical and wrong to generalise. Fourthly pressure groups disguise the true nature of power. By claiming that decision makers merely arbitrate between the views presented by competing groups, supporters of pluralism give the impression makers are neutral when their primary concern is the maintenance of the capitalist system. Marxists like pluralists agree that organised groups are important. However, the Marxist view holds that the state is far from neutral and the imbalance in terms of political power between the groups. Thus not only will the state in liberal democracies favour business interests against those of organised labour, but their is also a huge difference between the resources available to the two, this is described by Miliband as 'imperfect competition'. ...read more.


This is often out of proportion of their true importance in society. Therefore they can be seen as a threat to parliamentary democracy. Pressure groups themselves may not be internally democratic. Therefore it is wrong to assume they will be outwardly democratic and it will lead to leaders and spokesmen expressing opinions which are not reflective of the democratic system. This means they become reflections of elitism rather than pluralism. Trade unions were suspected of this practice before reforms of the 1980's. The same could be argued today of the Automobile Association, the British Medical Association, or the Football Association none of which have a process for consulting their members. In conclusion, on the whole pressure groups make a significant contribution to the democratic system. They allow the views of the minority to be heard and they promote mass participation in the political system. However they can led to an uneven spread of democracy and certain people benefit more from the system than others. In my opinion on the whole pressure groups enhance the political system. So in turn they are an important part of modern liberal democracies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. How do British Pressure groups exert influence?

    They are narrow-minded and are found mainly in the economic sphere of society. Examples are Trade unions, employers associations and professional bodies. The National Union of Teachers (NUT), the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, Trades Union Congress are examples of sectional groups.

  2. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    However, is it good for democratic system if a small group of ordinary people can undermine the government? The politicians, who sit in the Parliament, have to be aware of numerous issues not only of national but also of those world-wide importance and look at them from different angles.

  1. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    The Pluralist view is the main defence of interest groups in government. It is the idea that groups play a hugely valuable role in society as they disperse power so that no groups can dominate the political process. Under this, a powerful group such as the American Farm Bureau Association (Republican)

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    their views taken into account by the government simply because of their large amount of wealth. This would reduce democracy, as it promotes false representation of the public, as those with high levels of wealth are not always the ones who have the public's interests at heart.

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy? Harmful or Helpful?

    Channel of communication between public and politicians. e) They monitor the activities of government (keep government accountable), e.g., FECA laws passed in 1970s as pressure groups lobbied to tighten up election law after Watergate.

  2. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    is an unfair form of democracy, as it favours wealthier pressure groups, as it costs money to lobby firms and politicians. Another elitist viewpoint of this is by doing such activities can lead to sleaze and corruption inside the government, as there are possible "behind the scene" agreements and transactions

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    In the UK, many lobbyists are former MPs or have ties with MPs such as Jimmy Reid, son of John Reid who was Scottish Secretary. In the USA, many of the lobbyists are former congressmen or former lawyers who have over the years formed relationships with members of Congress.

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    Animal rights vs. the fur trade 2. Anti-smoking vs. the tobacco industry 3. Campaign for Real Ale vs. the brewers 4. League against Cruel Sports (anti-hunting) vs. the Countryside Alliance (NFU support) 1. The result of such struggles depend on the effectiveness of the campaign and the attitude of the gov 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work