Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

Are pressure groups good for democracy?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Are pressure groups good for democracy? There are many differing views on the role of the pressure group within the modern liberal democracy. Some political commentators claim that pressure groups led to an imbalance of democracy or a democratic deficit, because people who are members of pressure groups receive more of a political voice than those ordinary members of society whose access to democracy is their vote during elections. The opposite f this is the opinion which claims that pressure groups are not a form of democratic deficit but merely a way of the public getting its opinions herd and a form of communication between public and government. I am now going to analyse the pluralist model, and begin by answering the question what is a pluralist? Pluralists uphold the principle that political power in a liberal democracy is widely distributed, that continual competition between groups and that new groups constantly emerge. The pluralist would claim that the pressure group system is good for democracy as it allows people access to politics all the time as opposed to once every 4 years when an election is held.

Middle

It is more likely that a pressure group will be ignored by government than listened to. Secondly pressure groups are not representative of the public, and often their members, this is because many groups do not have procedures for consulting their members. Thirdly because of the wide range of pressure groups different groups exert different amounts of pressure on decision makers therefore it is impractical and wrong to generalise. Fourthly pressure groups disguise the true nature of power. By claiming that decision makers merely arbitrate between the views presented by competing groups, supporters of pluralism give the impression makers are neutral when their primary concern is the maintenance of the capitalist system. Marxists like pluralists agree that organised groups are important. However, the Marxist view holds that the state is far from neutral and the imbalance in terms of political power between the groups. Thus not only will the state in liberal democracies favour business interests against those of organised labour, but their is also a huge difference between the resources available to the two, this is described by Miliband as 'imperfect competition'.

Conclusion

This is often out of proportion of their true importance in society. Therefore they can be seen as a threat to parliamentary democracy. Pressure groups themselves may not be internally democratic. Therefore it is wrong to assume they will be outwardly democratic and it will lead to leaders and spokesmen expressing opinions which are not reflective of the democratic system. This means they become reflections of elitism rather than pluralism. Trade unions were suspected of this practice before reforms of the 1980's. The same could be argued today of the Automobile Association, the British Medical Association, or the Football Association none of which have a process for consulting their members. In conclusion, on the whole pressure groups make a significant contribution to the democratic system. They allow the views of the minority to be heard and they promote mass participation in the political system. However they can led to an uneven spread of democracy and certain people benefit more from the system than others. In my opinion on the whole pressure groups enhance the political system. So in turn they are an important part of modern liberal democracies.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    Some would argue that such activities of groups like this are undemocratic. Conversely, this issue can be thought of in an opposite view.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    The presence of the media is one which cannot be swapped for wealth in this case. The presence of wealth would probably not increase the success of Fathers4Justice, as the matter is unlikely to be high on the government's agenda regardless of the wealth of the outsider group.

  1. Why Have Pressure Groups Become More Popular Than Political Parties?

    Some groups use advertising firms, but this can be expensive, and most have to use personal contacts with journalists. If this is not possible, and because there is fierce competition for news space, some groups try to force themselves into the news by organising a demonstration, protest, petition, or some eye-catching event.

  2. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    The Pluralist view is the main defence of interest groups in government. It is the idea that groups play a hugely valuable role in society as they disperse power so that no groups can dominate the political process. Under this, a powerful group such as the American Farm Bureau Association (Republican)

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    increased and the range of issues which they are concerned with is gigantic. Therefore it may be supposed that pressure groups increase participation in local and national politics. It is also worth saying, that the level of success of an interest group is not determined by the number of its members.

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    Public opinion: 1. Public opinion can swing towards or against a particular issue 2. Can swing due to successful campaigns by PGs 3. Politicians are sensitive to such movements 4. The combination of effective campaigning and sympathetic public can be a powerful combination leading to change in policy/legislation 5.

  1. How do British Pressure groups exert influence?

    On the other hand, some cause groups have many members but little influence. For example, in the early 1980s, over 250,000 supporters of CND marched in London on several occasions, but despite this show of popular support, they failed to influence the government's defence policy.

  2. A Cabinet Minister once described Pressure Groups as Creatures which strangle efficient government. Discuss ...

    One of the reasons for pressure groups being good is that it is a very good way of getting the public to join in politics in-between elections. There was an e-petition (petitions that can be signed on the internet) which had 8.3 million peopleâs names on.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.