• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are pressure groups good for democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are pressure groups good for democracy? There are many differing views on the role of the pressure group within the modern liberal democracy. Some political commentators claim that pressure groups led to an imbalance of democracy or a democratic deficit, because people who are members of pressure groups receive more of a political voice than those ordinary members of society whose access to democracy is their vote during elections. The opposite f this is the opinion which claims that pressure groups are not a form of democratic deficit but merely a way of the public getting its opinions herd and a form of communication between public and government. I am now going to analyse the pluralist model, and begin by answering the question what is a pluralist? Pluralists uphold the principle that political power in a liberal democracy is widely distributed, that continual competition between groups and that new groups constantly emerge. The pluralist would claim that the pressure group system is good for democracy as it allows people access to politics all the time as opposed to once every 4 years when an election is held. ...read more.

Middle

It is more likely that a pressure group will be ignored by government than listened to. Secondly pressure groups are not representative of the public, and often their members, this is because many groups do not have procedures for consulting their members. Thirdly because of the wide range of pressure groups different groups exert different amounts of pressure on decision makers therefore it is impractical and wrong to generalise. Fourthly pressure groups disguise the true nature of power. By claiming that decision makers merely arbitrate between the views presented by competing groups, supporters of pluralism give the impression makers are neutral when their primary concern is the maintenance of the capitalist system. Marxists like pluralists agree that organised groups are important. However, the Marxist view holds that the state is far from neutral and the imbalance in terms of political power between the groups. Thus not only will the state in liberal democracies favour business interests against those of organised labour, but their is also a huge difference between the resources available to the two, this is described by Miliband as 'imperfect competition'. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is often out of proportion of their true importance in society. Therefore they can be seen as a threat to parliamentary democracy. Pressure groups themselves may not be internally democratic. Therefore it is wrong to assume they will be outwardly democratic and it will lead to leaders and spokesmen expressing opinions which are not reflective of the democratic system. This means they become reflections of elitism rather than pluralism. Trade unions were suspected of this practice before reforms of the 1980's. The same could be argued today of the Automobile Association, the British Medical Association, or the Football Association none of which have a process for consulting their members. In conclusion, on the whole pressure groups make a significant contribution to the democratic system. They allow the views of the minority to be heard and they promote mass participation in the political system. However they can led to an uneven spread of democracy and certain people benefit more from the system than others. In my opinion on the whole pressure groups enhance the political system. So in turn they are an important part of modern liberal democracies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    A small local pressure group in Oxfordshire called Save Radley Lakes that was formed in 2005 had around 500 participants, but there were 30-40 activists that had really made a difference. The group campaigned against RRWE NPower which announced their intention of filling some lakes in Oxfordshire with fuel ash from a power station.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    It is highly likely, that outsider groups will require the most assistance from the media, regardless of their wealth. Outsider groups such as the SSCS will rely heavily upon the media. This is due to the limitations of their influence on the government and for that reason, they must seek

  1. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    For example, the pressure group (ASH) Act on Smoking and Health have been successful in influencing the government to ban cigarette smoking in public places. Conversely, the other side to this argument is that the use of pressure groups taking this action encourages participation and the expression of differing opinions.

  2. Why Have Pressure Groups Become More Popular Than Political Parties?

    They believe that if they can get the media to focus on their particular group or campaign then they will have the attention of the public, for example Greenpeace. This particular pressure group is very good at publicity stunts which bring about much media attention, and this sometimes brings about a change in Government policies.

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    The business lobby is particularly influential in the USA as they possess so much money, and both the Democrats and the Republicans are vulnerable to big businesses, this is a threat to democracy. For example, the British American Tobacco in 1998 spent $25 million on lobbying as Congress were considering

  2. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    small channel of views being taken on board, which is contradictory to democratic process. So whilst there are currently around 15,000 Brussels-based lobbyists (consultants, lawyers, associations, corporations, NGOs etc.) and around 2,600 special interest groups have a permanent office in Brussels seeking to influence the policy of the European Union, there are undoubtedly groups that have greater influence than others.

  1. A Cabinet Minister once described Pressure Groups as Creatures which strangle efficient government. Discuss ...

    These include FOREST or âFreedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobaccoâ who defend the rights of smokers who say that they have been heavily victimised by the public and the media since the smoking ban in Britain. Another group would be the Stonewall group who represent gays in

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    or pensioners (approx 25% of population) but were sympathetic to homeowners 4. Size on its own won't get you noticed 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work