• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy? Harmful or Helpful?

Extracts from this document...


Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy? Harmful or Helpful? GOOD a) Pluralism Robert Dahl in "Who governs?" - examined decision-making in New Haven, Connecticut. Conclusion was that no elite group ran the town - on different issues, different groups were dominant. For pluralists pressure groups help the govt. to operate, their pressure is a reflection of public opinion and is vital to democracy providing a healthy 'free market' of opinion and influences. There are many access points, and freedom of speech and association are entrenched in the constitution. Ed Davis (California State Senator) - "About 90% of all legislation is conceived by special interests. That's what democracy is all about". Examples of pressure group activity helping democracy include Brown v. Board of Education which transformed the South, Rose v. ...read more.


Similarly, when the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (1946) proved ineffective, it was replaced with the Lobbying Disclosure Act in 1995. Pressure groups, therefore, far from shaping the political landscape are forced to respond to it. f) They allow people to participate in politics, beyond just voting in elections. g) Pressure groups generally balance each other out e.g. pro. v. anti-abortion. Intensifies the system of checks and balances set up by the Founding Fathers. h) Note that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002) tightened up the rules on finance limiting the actions of PAC's. Money could no longer be spent on directly supporting or opposing a candidate or supporting Federal campaigns. But a loophole was found and '527' pressure groups were set up to collect unlimited soft money to spend on: o voter mobilisation o advertising which is issue based rather than candidate based. ...read more.


e.g., the Tobacco Industry v. the Anti-Smoking lobby. Unlike democracy (one man one vote) pressure groups are selfish and power goes to the strongest (E.E. Schattsneider- "The Semi-Sovereign People") Senator Edward Kennedy once said the US has 'the finest Congress that money can buy'. PAC money can be unhealthy for democracy. c) Change is difficult. Those pressure groups that seek to prevent change and preserve status quo are most successful. US system of checks and balances is geared towards easy delay/obstruction. Pgs. are more concerned with 'special' interests than the national interest. d) Pressure group leaders are often unaccountable. Often not elected. e) The 'revolving door' syndrome allows former politicians to take up highly paid jobs as lobbyists. f) Violence, increasing in recent years. Anti - abortion bombs and assassinations, animal rights groups, anti-capitalist groups. g) Clientelism - p.g. and bureaucrats reinforce each other's goals e.g. Pentagon and the ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    There are more corporate PACs than any other. PACs funding of Congressional elections is heavily directed towards incumbents. In 1998, incumbents received 78% of PAC donations. Some congressmen do not accept money offered to them by PACs but the majority rely on it. However, if you have access to legal money to finance an election campaign you are

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    Substantial public support will undoubtedly raise the revenue of pressure groups, due to an increase in donations and subsidies. Ultimately, the amount of backing a pressure group has from the public, will determine how urgently the government deal with the matter at hand.

  1. What are the reasons for the increasing importance of pressure group activity?

    As I have mentioned already nowadays those politicians who have power in their hands are somewhere in the so-called 'liberal framework'. In our post-industrial time most people prefer to reject any ideological conceptions. Moreover, quite a lot of them are strongly against any ideologies regarding Nazi-Germany, Communist Soviet Union etc.

  2. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    Those issues are: an opportunity for people to participate in national and local politics, an intermediary between government and people, 'safety valve', the need of government in superior knowledge and improving legislation. As it was said before, the membership in political parties has seriously fallen in recent years.

  1. Are pressure groups good for democracy?

    This is the pluralist view however many commentators disagree with this viewpoint. I am now going to outline the opposition to, and criticisms of the pluralist view. The first point that must be made is that pluralism is a political theory and may not work in practice.

  2. This house believes that democracy is undesirable for a good society".

    o Also, the internet has opened up new ways of participating in politics an has made government institutions much more accessible. Online petitions and pressure groups with online membership facilities all contribute to an increase in participation opportunities. * Elections are held with intervals, and so, in the time between

  1. When The Arguments For and Against Have Been Taken Into Account, It Is Clear ...

    Pressure groups can sometimes be very much a local organisation enabling local issues to be aired and discussed on a local level - in some cases the issues wouldn't have otherwise been dealt with. Thus pressure groups are a way of articulating local grievances and they can help in the

  2. To what extent have pressure groups in the UK changed in recent years?

    Digital democracy is also a hugely significant factor in why pressure groups have experienced change in recent years. Technology is always improving and so pressure groups can accordingly develop their methods and strategies to help them benefit as much as possible by using technological advancements such as the internet.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work