• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy? Harmful or Helpful?

Extracts from this document...


Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy? Harmful or Helpful? GOOD a) Pluralism Robert Dahl in "Who governs?" - examined decision-making in New Haven, Connecticut. Conclusion was that no elite group ran the town - on different issues, different groups were dominant. For pluralists pressure groups help the govt. to operate, their pressure is a reflection of public opinion and is vital to democracy providing a healthy 'free market' of opinion and influences. There are many access points, and freedom of speech and association are entrenched in the constitution. Ed Davis (California State Senator) - "About 90% of all legislation is conceived by special interests. That's what democracy is all about". Examples of pressure group activity helping democracy include Brown v. Board of Education which transformed the South, Rose v. ...read more.


Similarly, when the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (1946) proved ineffective, it was replaced with the Lobbying Disclosure Act in 1995. Pressure groups, therefore, far from shaping the political landscape are forced to respond to it. f) They allow people to participate in politics, beyond just voting in elections. g) Pressure groups generally balance each other out e.g. pro. v. anti-abortion. Intensifies the system of checks and balances set up by the Founding Fathers. h) Note that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002) tightened up the rules on finance limiting the actions of PAC's. Money could no longer be spent on directly supporting or opposing a candidate or supporting Federal campaigns. But a loophole was found and '527' pressure groups were set up to collect unlimited soft money to spend on: o voter mobilisation o advertising which is issue based rather than candidate based. ...read more.


e.g., the Tobacco Industry v. the Anti-Smoking lobby. Unlike democracy (one man one vote) pressure groups are selfish and power goes to the strongest (E.E. Schattsneider- "The Semi-Sovereign People") Senator Edward Kennedy once said the US has 'the finest Congress that money can buy'. PAC money can be unhealthy for democracy. c) Change is difficult. Those pressure groups that seek to prevent change and preserve status quo are most successful. US system of checks and balances is geared towards easy delay/obstruction. Pgs. are more concerned with 'special' interests than the national interest. d) Pressure group leaders are often unaccountable. Often not elected. e) The 'revolving door' syndrome allows former politicians to take up highly paid jobs as lobbyists. f) Violence, increasing in recent years. Anti - abortion bombs and assassinations, animal rights groups, anti-capitalist groups. g) Clientelism - p.g. and bureaucrats reinforce each other's goals e.g. Pentagon and the ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    Those issues are: an opportunity for people to participate in national and local politics, an intermediary between government and people, 'safety valve', the need of government in superior knowledge and improving legislation. As it was said before, the membership in political parties has seriously fallen in recent years.

  2. What are the reasons for the increasing importance of pressure group activity?

    Taking all this into consideration I think that although the similarity of political parties is one of the reasons for an increase in pressure group activity it is not the most important one.

  1. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    Therefore, they often require direct action in order to gain the attention of the government. This means that often outsider groups are unable to gain enough ammunition to have their voice heard and this means that their wealth may not always be enough to influence government policy.

  2. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    is an unfair form of democracy, as it favours wealthier pressure groups, as it costs money to lobby firms and politicians. Another elitist viewpoint of this is by doing such activities can lead to sleaze and corruption inside the government, as there are possible "behind the scene" agreements and transactions

  1. In what ways, if at all, might it be said that democracy ensures power ...

    However as Grant (1998) states it's not often that the government listens to a pressure group that doesn't confirm to the ideology of the party. Marxists argue that pluralism is a clever disguise of the ruling class, as they portray the decision makers as arbitrators between competing groups agendas.

  2. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    They have a chance to protest, petition and lobby which is all part of a healthy democratic society. The term "pressure group" is a broad term; so political commentator Wyn Grant makes the distinction between insider and outsider groups. Although difficult, it is possible to distinguish one from the other, by looking at the strategies they employ.

  1. Are pressure groups good for democracy?

    An example of the channelling of communication between the people and the government would be the anti- war in Iraq protests. Although the government still decided to go through with invading Iraq at least they knew what a lot of people's feelings were about it, and so in the future

  2. A Cabinet Minister once described Pressure Groups as Creatures which strangle efficient government. Discuss ...

    The New Right would say that Pressure Group leaders don?t represent the members of that Pressure Group. You could be a member of the Automobile Association (AA) but you might not approve of the AA?s policy of agreeing with the government on taxing road users if they drive at peak times on motorways.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work