• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The Prime Minister is constrained by his or her cabinet colleagues, the will of Parliament and the decisions of the judiciary. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The Prime Minister is constrained by his or her cabinet colleagues, the will of Parliament and the decisions of the judiciary. The British Constitution rests on the separation of power and the operation of the rule of law. The Prime Minister operates firmly within the particular constitutional arrangement in place for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is true. As the head of the executive branch of government and chair of the cabinet, the Prime Minister is the most high profile politician in Britain and the questions surrounding the post's status and power are central to an understanding of the British political system. Like other western democracies, the responsibilities and functions are in relation to a constitutional framework, which sets out certain boundaries for the executive, legislative and judicial aspects of government. However, such a framework is largely unwritten and uncodified, something that has a considerable effect on the practical realities of being Prime Minister. Additionally, the British political climate has come under recent pressure, due to the changing nature of the core executive and the impact of the mass media and influence of the European Union. This essay intends to analyse the main assumptions of the British constitution, in specific relation to what extent they have a bearing on the prime minister's powers and limitations, where a strong focus will be on both the theoretical and practical ramifications surrounding the power of his or her position. ...read more.

Middle

For example, James Callaghan's labour party was forced to stand down in 1979. However, the Prime Minister does acquire the power to appoint whips (more common in the House of Commons than the House of Lords), that are imposed to try and force members to agree with proposals. If a bill makes it to the House of Lords, it is here considered in detail and amendments are made9. This then means the bill is sent back to the House of Commons, delaying the enactment of the bill. The House of Lords can limit both what the Prime Minister puts through the House of Commons and the speed at which it can pass through the House of Lords. However, it must be stressed that the House of Lords is essentially a revisory chamber, where its major influence is "through persuasion and the correction of detail rather than direct defiance of the Prime Minister"10. Decisions made by the judiciary also place some constraint on the Prime Minister. Although the executive appoints judges, their independence is secured by law. "The English Courts' powers extend beyond reviewing the technical legality of the administrative act or decision"11. One of the judiciary's functions is to protect citizens against unlawful acts of government agencies and officials12 and therefore has the power to review unreasonable exercise of the powers given to the executive. The Prime Minister and other members of government are restrained from criticising the judiciary by convention. ...read more.

Conclusion

This access to the media gives the Prime Minister power over government colleagues. The nature of the British political system is far from straightforward, in that candid statements pointing to the Prime Minister's unlimited powers, or the spent tenets of the British constitution offer only inaccurate analysis. The concepts of a separation of powers and a rule of law are not in the realm of constitutional legality, largely due to the fact that the British constitution is unwritten and lives off custom and convention. Therefore the Prime Minister is perhaps not scrutinised, as he or she would be if the constitution were more legally grounded. However, these principles do serve as a sound basis for the making and evaluation of government policy. They promote the virtues of regularity, rationality and integrity on the part of those central to the parliamentary process. There are other, more subtle factors at work as well. The premiership is not just one individual, however his or her personal style is crucially important, as demonstrated by the contrasting leadership strategies of MrsThatcher, Mr Major and Mr Blair. Although there can be differences in style and circumstances, the Prime Ministers are fundamentally leaders. It is the Prime Minister's job to rise above cabinet issues and in this sense the Prime Minister is not a colleague, but the boss. With a close hold on the executive branch, as well as a considerable majority in parliament, Prime Ministers have the power to press their governmental programmes and policy-making agendas with undeniable authority. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does the prime minister control the cabinet?

    4 star(s)

    Her Deputy Prime Minister, Geoffrey Howe even resigned over her European policy. Once Cabinet begin to lose support of the Prime Minister, inevitably some will resign, and examples of these from Thatcher's era are not only Geoffrey Howe, but Nigel Lawson (Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1989)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How effective is the British Constitution in protecting the rights of its citizens?

    3 star(s)

    Parliamentary sovereignty has been described by Bagehot as "The dominant characteristic of the British Constitution." Parliamentary authority is unlimited unless the EU is involved. Since 1973 the UK has possessed dual constitutional arrangements; as an independent unitary state, and as a member of the European Union.

  1. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    system and the use of the Whips is in effect a guarantee of legislative success, especially true with the current Blair government which holds a massive majority in parliament, so much so that even legislation which faces much opposition from within can pass with ease.

  2. The relationship between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Recent examples have included the educational blips made by Estelle Morris, the former Education Secretary, involving A-level results, Key Stage 3 results and top-up fees, and Neil Hamilton over the "Cash for Questions" and other sleaze allegations. The Exchange Rate Mechanism devaluation and exit prompted then Chancellor Nigel Lawson to

  1. What Limits Are There on The Power of The Prime Minister?

    More presently, Tony Blair's Cabinet has included ministers who do not agree with the 'new' Labour views and policies and whose 'old' Labour views are well attested, such as Prescott and Beckett. Martin Burch stated in 1990 that the Prime Minister has to make ministerial appointments with some recognition of the need for political balance and administrative competence.

  2. To what extent does the prime minister dominate the UK political system?

    These advisors are not civil servants; they are personally employed by the PM. They are also despised by ministers who believe that the PM should ask them for advice. However if the PM asks his minister and an advisor for an opinion, he will likely get two differing opinions as the advisors often give conflicting advice.

  1. Discuss the indepedence of the UK Judiciary

    The Human Rights Act of 1998 effectively enhances the role of judges in such scenarios. One of the most influential factors influencing judicial independence is the sub judice rule. This rule is widely acknowledged (and is pretty much mandatory to be)

  2. "Parliament carries out none of it's function adequately". Discuss

    An example of this is the Home Affairs Select Committee that investigated the phone hacking scandal, involving news of the world. An advantage of select committees is that they can highlight an issue and bring it to the medias attention.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work