• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

Extracts from this document...


Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction Sir Karl Popper 1902-1994 is seen as the most important and profound philosopher of science since Francis Bacon in the 16th and 17th century. He was born in Vienna in 1902, but moved to England in 1946 to become a Professor of logic and scientific method at LSE for 23 years. Popper wanted to solve the puzzle of scientific method; the problem of induction expressed earlier by the philosopher David Hume. In this forthcoming essay I intend to proceed by highlighting the original problem of induction, breaking it down into its two major components, but concentrating solely on that which Popper found most contradicting i.e. OTU induction. I will then illustrate how Popper criticises the inductive process and offer to the reader Popper's solution to it. After identifying the problem, I will then go on to set out Popper's very own deductive theoretical solution, that of falsification. I shall provide a rounded argument for and against falsification taking into account criticisms of it and support for it. To conclude I shall provide the reader with, for all its worth, my own stance on the problem of induction, that is, if after examination I believe there to be one. ...read more.


One can only be sure of what has happened in the past or what is happening in the present, not what might, could or should happen in the future. Popper denies scientists two crucial aspects of what was believed to be the process of their experimental practices. Popper claims that scientists do not start without any prejudices or preconceived thoughts, they impose their beliefs, opinions and theories upon that which they are studying. They begin a search for what they need to find in order to verify a conscious or subconscious hypothesis. He denies that the scientist infers from observation putative laws and he further denies that the scientist could ever confirm these laws through increases in the number of instances whereby the law is witnessed. He gives the example of white swans. He claims that there could be a hypothesis that all swans are white, but for every extra white swan that is observed this does not justify the claim that all swans are white, it simply increases the probability of the next observed swan being white. According to Karl Popper we should not make generalisations about the unobserved from the observed. ...read more.


It is a theoretical vantage point, not a practical solution to everyday life. People will, according to Popper, always make unjustified predictions about the future based upon probability. Such guesses do not entitle us to valid beliefs only to a life of simplicity and normality. Popper concluded that all we know is but 3,'a woven web of guesses', that while empirical generalisations may not be verifiable, they are at least falsifiable. In conclusion, I feel this to be a misguided theory. After much contemplation I am resolute in my opinion that induction is a valid, logical and justifiable means by which to create hypotheses. This opinion is one that is perhaps made bias by the scientific world in which we live. I hold strong beliefs in the cause and effect relationship and insist that natural laws although perhaps not infinite are truly justified. Nonetheless I do believe that Popper's theory provides us with an incentive to test, critise and attempt to falsify those laws that already exist. For in an ever changing world it is important to challenge long standing beliefs and normative values, otherwise I fear natural development and progression could only ever regress. Popper 1963, - biographies of sir Karl popper pp 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Just because the majority benefit, it does not mean that the action is the morally correct thing to do. Despite all the arguments against Utilitarianism, there are some valid points for the theory. It is widely accepted, many countries run by means of democracy.

  2. Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our ...

    Some countries, such as the USA and Australia developed at a quicker rate due to colonisation. Frank's explanation of the process of exploitation related to unfair trade and ignored other factors such as labour exploitation and taxes imposed by the colonial powers which stimulated the outflow of resources.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    6. According to Luke (1996), sovereign states are rational self-seeking actors which are resolutely, if not exclusively, concerned with relative gains because they must function in an anarchial environment in which their security and well-being ultimately rest on their ability to mobilise resources against external threats.

  2. Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

    but can involve many different people. Pornography can also be divided into soft-core and hardcore, with more sexually explicit and indecent forms coming under the illegal category of hardcore. The question before us is whether Mills principles can warrant pornography censorship. Many would argue that they would warrant censorship especially writers like Catherine MacKinnon.

  1. The Search for independence, Macedonia

    In the Second World War Yugoslavia and Greece fell to the Germans early in 1941 despite their stubborn resistance. For a brief period during the Second World War the territory of Macedonia was over Bulgaria, but afterwards was incorporated into Yugoslavia.

  2. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    In the German Ideology Marx investigated the claims of the post-Hegelian philosophers - Feuerbach, Stirner, Bauer and others only to find them utterly unscientific. The problem with defying reality, Marx wrote, was that reality had the stubborn quality of making herself known.

  1. A Criticism of the Supremacy of Science.

    In short, science deals with the how, religion with the why. Although science attempts to understand the world around us, how it was created and how we and other creatures came to exist, it can never fully explain the automated human search for a higher being.

  2. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    This lends an inference that they must end on a preferred surface. Superficially, this notion seems to break the relativistic invariance of the theory, possibly leading to a paradox. The resolution of this paradox is that strings end on a p-dimensional dynamic object, the Dp-brane.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work