• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

Extracts from this document...


Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction Sir Karl Popper 1902-1994 is seen as the most important and profound philosopher of science since Francis Bacon in the 16th and 17th century. He was born in Vienna in 1902, but moved to England in 1946 to become a Professor of logic and scientific method at LSE for 23 years. Popper wanted to solve the puzzle of scientific method; the problem of induction expressed earlier by the philosopher David Hume. In this forthcoming essay I intend to proceed by highlighting the original problem of induction, breaking it down into its two major components, but concentrating solely on that which Popper found most contradicting i.e. OTU induction. I will then illustrate how Popper criticises the inductive process and offer to the reader Popper's solution to it. After identifying the problem, I will then go on to set out Popper's very own deductive theoretical solution, that of falsification. I shall provide a rounded argument for and against falsification taking into account criticisms of it and support for it. To conclude I shall provide the reader with, for all its worth, my own stance on the problem of induction, that is, if after examination I believe there to be one. ...read more.


One can only be sure of what has happened in the past or what is happening in the present, not what might, could or should happen in the future. Popper denies scientists two crucial aspects of what was believed to be the process of their experimental practices. Popper claims that scientists do not start without any prejudices or preconceived thoughts, they impose their beliefs, opinions and theories upon that which they are studying. They begin a search for what they need to find in order to verify a conscious or subconscious hypothesis. He denies that the scientist infers from observation putative laws and he further denies that the scientist could ever confirm these laws through increases in the number of instances whereby the law is witnessed. He gives the example of white swans. He claims that there could be a hypothesis that all swans are white, but for every extra white swan that is observed this does not justify the claim that all swans are white, it simply increases the probability of the next observed swan being white. According to Karl Popper we should not make generalisations about the unobserved from the observed. ...read more.


It is a theoretical vantage point, not a practical solution to everyday life. People will, according to Popper, always make unjustified predictions about the future based upon probability. Such guesses do not entitle us to valid beliefs only to a life of simplicity and normality. Popper concluded that all we know is but 3,'a woven web of guesses', that while empirical generalisations may not be verifiable, they are at least falsifiable. In conclusion, I feel this to be a misguided theory. After much contemplation I am resolute in my opinion that induction is a valid, logical and justifiable means by which to create hypotheses. This opinion is one that is perhaps made bias by the scientific world in which we live. I hold strong beliefs in the cause and effect relationship and insist that natural laws although perhaps not infinite are truly justified. Nonetheless I do believe that Popper's theory provides us with an incentive to test, critise and attempt to falsify those laws that already exist. For in an ever changing world it is important to challenge long standing beliefs and normative values, otherwise I fear natural development and progression could only ever regress. Popper 1963, - biographies of sir Karl popper pp 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our ...

    Rostow's model, like Frank's dependency theory, came in for criticism mainly due to the slow progress being made more obvious than before. There was a low level of explanation concerning the specific mechanisms linking together the different stages. Rostow's model was also analogy based, and was too simplistic that developing

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Our political leaders are elected through the ballot box, the majority overriding the minority. This however does not automatically mean that they are the most suited people for the job. Utilitarianism allows people to contemplate the situation before making the decision.

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    Lenin attributed this shortcoming to the persistence of false consciousness among the workers, that is - that they fell under the influence of capitalist ideology. Hence, the need for the Marxist-Leninist ideology to educate the workers. At the same time, Lenin furthered the study of Marxism as a science.

  2. Natural Science

    They must be able to be tested. It must be possible for an empirical scientific system to be refuted by experience. Thus the statement "It will rain or not rain here tomorrow" will not be regarded as empirical simply because it cannot be refuted, whereas the statement "It will rain here tomorrow" will be regarded as empirical.

  1. Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

    So if the state comes to the conclusion that people are engaging in activities that are harmful to themselves and are not being rational about it then he allows for interference. Although this doesn't mention pornography, it could be evaluated in this manner and censored accordingly.

  2. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    The importance of D-branes stems from the fact that they make it possible to study the excitations of the brane using the renormalizable 2D quantum field theory of the open string instead of the non-renormalizable world-volume theory of the D-brane itself.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    Contributions and insights As Burd (in Sabine 1973:329) explains, "Living at a time when the old political order in Europe was collapsing and new problems both in state and society were arising with dazzling rapidity, he endeavoured to interpret the logical meaning of events, to forecast the inevitable issues,

  2. A Criticism of the Supremacy of Science.

    In short, science deals with the how, religion with the why. Although science attempts to understand the world around us, how it was created and how we and other creatures came to exist, it can never fully explain the automated human search for a higher being.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work