• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

Extracts from this document...


Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction Sir Karl Popper 1902-1994 is seen as the most important and profound philosopher of science since Francis Bacon in the 16th and 17th century. He was born in Vienna in 1902, but moved to England in 1946 to become a Professor of logic and scientific method at LSE for 23 years. Popper wanted to solve the puzzle of scientific method; the problem of induction expressed earlier by the philosopher David Hume. In this forthcoming essay I intend to proceed by highlighting the original problem of induction, breaking it down into its two major components, but concentrating solely on that which Popper found most contradicting i.e. OTU induction. I will then illustrate how Popper criticises the inductive process and offer to the reader Popper's solution to it. After identifying the problem, I will then go on to set out Popper's very own deductive theoretical solution, that of falsification. I shall provide a rounded argument for and against falsification taking into account criticisms of it and support for it. To conclude I shall provide the reader with, for all its worth, my own stance on the problem of induction, that is, if after examination I believe there to be one. ...read more.


One can only be sure of what has happened in the past or what is happening in the present, not what might, could or should happen in the future. Popper denies scientists two crucial aspects of what was believed to be the process of their experimental practices. Popper claims that scientists do not start without any prejudices or preconceived thoughts, they impose their beliefs, opinions and theories upon that which they are studying. They begin a search for what they need to find in order to verify a conscious or subconscious hypothesis. He denies that the scientist infers from observation putative laws and he further denies that the scientist could ever confirm these laws through increases in the number of instances whereby the law is witnessed. He gives the example of white swans. He claims that there could be a hypothesis that all swans are white, but for every extra white swan that is observed this does not justify the claim that all swans are white, it simply increases the probability of the next observed swan being white. According to Karl Popper we should not make generalisations about the unobserved from the observed. ...read more.


It is a theoretical vantage point, not a practical solution to everyday life. People will, according to Popper, always make unjustified predictions about the future based upon probability. Such guesses do not entitle us to valid beliefs only to a life of simplicity and normality. Popper concluded that all we know is but 3,'a woven web of guesses', that while empirical generalisations may not be verifiable, they are at least falsifiable. In conclusion, I feel this to be a misguided theory. After much contemplation I am resolute in my opinion that induction is a valid, logical and justifiable means by which to create hypotheses. This opinion is one that is perhaps made bias by the scientific world in which we live. I hold strong beliefs in the cause and effect relationship and insist that natural laws although perhaps not infinite are truly justified. Nonetheless I do believe that Popper's theory provides us with an incentive to test, critise and attempt to falsify those laws that already exist. For in an ever changing world it is important to challenge long standing beliefs and normative values, otherwise I fear natural development and progression could only ever regress. Popper 1963, - biographies of sir Karl popper pp 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    How do we decide which pleasure the majority would prefer? This refers to preference Utilitarianism where the action is taken that is most favourable to the majority. The rules of Utilitarianism allow people to do things, which are usually considered immoral.

  2. Natural Science

    B.C. Ptolemy described the system in detail. Of course, human beings were the centre of God's creation. A Ptolemaic model, a legacy of nearly 2000 years, was also very deeply entrenched in the thinking of the Christian Catholic church. 4. Crisis In his stage an accepted theory fails increasingly to explain anomalous findings - odd bits of

  1. Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our ...

    Some countries, such as the USA and Australia developed at a quicker rate due to colonisation. Frank's explanation of the process of exploitation related to unfair trade and ignored other factors such as labour exploitation and taxes imposed by the colonial powers which stimulated the outflow of resources.

  2. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    bleating merely imitates in a philosophic form the conceptions of the German middle class; how the boasting of these philosophic commentators only mirrors the wretchedness of the real conditions in Germany."[15] The existence of the German middle class would have been impossible without the onset of industrialization, and that, in turn, depended on the invention of the steam engine, etc.

  1. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    Strominger and Vafa proved for large values of the charges the entropy S = logN, where N is equal to the number of quantum states that system can be in, agrees with the Bekenstein-Hawking prediction (1/4 the area of the event horizon).

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    The meaning he attached to the state is still widely accepted today and the idea of the state as a sovereign political authority has evolved from his writings. As Sabine (1973:329) explains, the state as an organised force, supreme in its own territory and pursuing a conscious policy of aggrandisement

  1. A Criticism of the Supremacy of Science.

    It's explanations fall far short of what would be needed to satisfy human curiosity. Religion, in general, does a much better job of explaining what needs to be explained about human nature. However, Scientists in recent years have attempted to give their work a status of being unquestionably correct.

  2. Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

    As a utilitarian, Mill believed in the principle of "the greatest happiness for the greatest number"4 and connected freedom to this happiness. In a search for truth, that brings happiness, people must have freedom to act according to their own plan for their lives, as they know best for themselves

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work