• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy? Direct democracy occurs "where the will of the people is translated into public policy directly by the people", and can be thought of as "the absence of an election." The most common form of direct democracy is a referendum, although there are others. Although Britain is primarily a representative democracy, it does have some degree of direct democracy. Perhaps the main disadvantage of direct democracy is that the demos (or people) may not fully understand complex political questions. The Ancient Greek philosopher Plato feared that the "mass were unwise", and could therefore make foolish decisions based upon short-term considerations. ...read more.


Under the Athenian model persuasive orators can sway the crowd, appealing to emotion rather than intellect. This was Plato's argument against democracy, as he feared that the "people would be swayed emotionally, rather than thinking rationally." For example if a referendum were to be held on bringing back the death penalty after a particularly shocking murder, people might vote on emotional grounds rather than consider all the rational arguments. Too many referendums may lead to apathy and political instability, and lead to disillusionment with the political process. Even among advocates of greater democracy, there is an acceptance of the desirability of order within society. ...read more.


However under a direct system, this problem is avoided. Moreover decisions gain a greater degree of legitimacy and support amongst the public, because they are based solely upon the views of the people as opposed to an out-of-touch elite. Referendums can also help to promote political education and participation, thereby enhancing the concept of citizenship. Direct democracy also ensures greater freedom than would be the case under a representative system. Some of those who support direct democracy are anarchists who favour total freedom for the individual and the absence of political rule. Ultimately direct democracy is the purest form of democracy, and avoids most of the problems associated with indirect democracy. However its greatest drawback is that direct democracy is impractical - except for the occasional referendum. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Utilitarianism?

    which also substituted 'pleasure' for happiness "the greatest happiness for the greatest number" and moved from mere quantity to involving the quality of happiness as well. He argued that pleasures of the mind should take priority over physical pleasures and that, since basic human requirements for survival were fulfilled, a

  2. Assess the advantages of direct and representative democracy

    It is a true government of the people, not one merely acting in the name of. Undeniably this is beneficial in the sense that it's the only pure, genuine form of democracy and therefore, in principle, improves the democratic process and strengthens popular participation in the governed area.

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    Now we come to the time of Cylon (636 B.C.) and Draco (last quarter of 6th century B.C.) and the third stage. Cylon was significant in that the Olympic champion had tried to install himself as tyrant of Athens by armed force (the way that tyrants achieved power)

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    no closer to the people, than huge bureaucracies tend to be everywhere. The country's cultural and intellectual life remained substantially under the control of the ruling party. Party ideology, meanwhile, stressed that socialism had been attained and genuine communism was near (Pious).

  1. Does the mass media have a direct effect on British Politics?

    to their readership, so the agenda they set must be what their readership wants to read about, as their power of setting the agenda will disappear as their readership does. Again, there is not enough evidence to either conclusively prove or disprove this, but the available evidence points to it

  2. Does democracy bring peace?

    of years and are not the fault of democracy and if anything it is democracy that is preventing these long time enemies going to war. Realists have raised the question as to how "democratic peace" theorists can be sure that a world of democratic states would never experience war when such a world has never existed.

  1. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    It highlights that the oracle mongers were nothing but frauds, only eager for the money that the success of the campaign would have brought in.7 Thus, after this wrong interpretation of the oracles, the Athenians did not publicly consult any forms of divination for political matters.

  2. What are the advantages of utilitarianism?

    It is also secular and based on human experience, so becomes more popular as people move away from religion. Utilitarianism has considerable strengths as an ethical theory, advocated by Bentham and Mill, the most prominent being its altruistic, democratic, simple, relative and perennial value.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work