• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the advantages and disadvantages of the First Past the Post Electoral system

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the advantages and disadvantages of the First Past the Post Electoral system The FPTP voting system is the current electoral system used in the UK. The Country is divided into 650 constituencies and each constituency has their own individual MP that represents the people of the constituency. Each MP is voted in by the FPTP system. When election time arrives, each legible voter puts a cross next to the candidate of their choice; the candidate with the most votes in the constituency becomes the MP for that area. Then, the party with the highest number of winning MPs forms the government. The First Past the Post system is also very easy to understand. ...read more.


Lastly, the First Past the Post system promotes strong, majority governments; this means there is less friction between governments as it is generally one party that has the power rather than a coalition. This is achieved because parties such as Labour and Conservative do well as they gain the majority of seats due to the idea of concentration in certain areas. However, this is also said to be unfair as parties such as Liberal Democrats are not equally weighted to Labour and Conservative, as their votes are thinly spread leading to less votes than the concentrated seats gained from Labour and Conservative. For example, in 2005, the average vote for Labour was 42,000 votes, Conservative was 44,000 and for Liberal Democrats, a huge figure of 97,000! ...read more.


The last negative point is that unfortunately, the system also means aswell as winning by just one vote, that a party can also lose by as little as one vote. This follows a ?winner takes all? idea, which is very unfair for the losing party if this situation occurred. In my opinion, although the FPTP system definitely has its advantages, I believe it is strongly outweighed by the large number of disadvantages. Although the recent referendum of 2005 suggested people are not interested in changing the electoral system, I believe this is because of a lack of knowledge to how unfair the FPTP system is. I believe if people supporting parties such as Liberal Democrats realized how many more MPs could be achieved for them by using an alternative voting system, I think they would definitely chose to change this plurality system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Outline the problems of the First Past the Post system and consider whether the ...

    3 star(s)

    As this system allows preference-based candidates numbering, where in case of first choice elimination, the next chosen party has extra votes. In this way people waste much fewer votes than in constituency election system, which is AV system's advantage over FPTP.

  2. What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of First Past the Post?

    This in turn helps to make more effective policies and a government may gain a sustained decision on those policies. Supporters say that coalition governments formed of several parties are inherently unstable and often achieve undue influence from some of the smaller component parties.

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    In a closed system, however, it is easy for the party to choose favourites rather than those best suited to the job and the voters have too little choice. In an open list system voters also get to make a list of the MPs in order of preference, instead of

  2. The case Against Electoral Reform

    The main difference is that in a closed party-list system, votes are cast for parties rather than people, whereas in an open party list system, votes are cast for individual candidates. This is used in the British elections to the European Parliament, Israel's Parliament-the Knesset and The Netherlands' Second Chamber.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work