• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the advantages of direct and representative democracy

Extracts from this document...


Assess the advantages of direct democracy There are four main "benefits" of direct democracy, but are they really beneficial to the people who live in it? The first benefit is that there is no separate political class from the people - they are the ones making the laws they live under. The people act as a collective to create their own economic and social conditions. I see this as beneficial as it reduces dependence on professional politicians who can easily end up distorting public opinion, but there are still some issues with this so called benefit. A government without experts in various fields surely is not best placed to act in the public interest whereas professional politicians have a better education and expertise in crucial areas than the masses. Personally I'd be willing to accept a gulf between the people and the government in order to have highly trained individuals who work solely in politics rather than have the public try and balance their everyday lives and jobs with constant political participation. ...read more.


Direct democracy has far greater legitimacy than an elected body of officials and career politicians as they are decisions that have been decided on by those who are required to follow them. For me this is a huge benefit as citizens take direct responsibility for political decisions and can't shift the blame onto anyone else which should ensure a stable government. On the other hand it could be argued that citizens being responsible for political decisions could lead to an upsurge in unwillingness to compromise which could obviously spawn public conflict. The closer people get to an issue, the more passionate and devoted they may get. Assess the advantages of representative democracy It is a more practical form of democracy. As I have already said, direct democracy can only really work in small communities, as mass meetings to decide matters of state are nearly impossible. It is seen as the form of popular rule in large modern communities. I'm yet to find a drawback of a practical system, whatever its other flaws, so I can only conclude that it is indeed a genuine benefit. ...read more.


Personally I disagree and think that if people want to participate in politics then they can easily apply to take part in focus groups or vote in referendums and voter apathy is more a product of politicians that people can't relate to, constant un-kept manifesto promises and a lack of choice when it comes to individuals and political parties. It also helps maintain greater political stability as it separates people from the major political decisions of the time. A certain amount of public apathy is seen as useful for maintaining order because when people become more directly involved in politics they usually become more passionate which often leads to greater conflict. I would see this more as political stagnation rather than stability as I can't see how you can see public apathy in a positive light. Low voter turnout can lead to bad policy. If very few people vote, there is a very low chance that those in office will be voted out of office (political stagnation), regardless of what they do while they are in office. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Their reasoning makes sense not just because, for example, the learning process tends to favor senior managers but also because the kind and quality of information to which those managers have access becomes, in itself, an instrument for exercising and preserving one's favorable position in the power hierarchy.

  2. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy.

    It could also be argued that direct democracy is costly in terms of money, and is much more time-consuming than representative democracy. As with any form of democracy, there are also advantages to consider. The main argument in favour of direct democracy is that the wishes of the people are

  1. Are Judges Politicians In Disguise?

    The Marbury vs. Madison case was a landmark decision that affected judicial review. President John Adams gave a last minute appointment before leaving the office to William Marbury as an official in the District of Columbia. The incoming Secretary of State James Madison who was responsible for these appointments didn't carry out that

  2. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    govern collective life, and when support for antisystem alternatives is quite small or more-or-less isolated from prodemocratic forces." (Linz & Stepan, 1996) Democratic procedures include public contestation and public participation. Increasing public contestation helps strengthen democratic institutions. The greater the plurality of parties, the more difficult it will be for one party to be hegemonic (ie.

  1. The Disillusionment of Paradise - Jamaica

    On the other hand, my experiences have had a positive influence on the way I think and attach problems. The illusion of paradise for the island of Jamaica, on the contrary, is viewed as a reality for most individuals who are not natives.

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    always leader centred and heavily dependent on a single person for cohesion. As a result, its strengths and weaknesses were often those of the person in charge'. (Wynia, 1999, p 221). What can be said is that populism did not just appear overnight and in Argentina early forms of populism

  1. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    On a large scale, out of pure pragmatism, what appears to result is a resort to some kind of representative system where a few will represent the views of the majority who, for practical purposes, cannot voice their own opinions in a large group.

  2. Advantages of direct and representative democracy

    This is good because it gives them a chance to show the people that they are there to represent them, not just do what they themselves want.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work