• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the advantages of direct and representative democracy

Extracts from this document...


Assess the advantages of direct democracy There are four main "benefits" of direct democracy, but are they really beneficial to the people who live in it? The first benefit is that there is no separate political class from the people - they are the ones making the laws they live under. The people act as a collective to create their own economic and social conditions. I see this as beneficial as it reduces dependence on professional politicians who can easily end up distorting public opinion, but there are still some issues with this so called benefit. A government without experts in various fields surely is not best placed to act in the public interest whereas professional politicians have a better education and expertise in crucial areas than the masses. Personally I'd be willing to accept a gulf between the people and the government in order to have highly trained individuals who work solely in politics rather than have the public try and balance their everyday lives and jobs with constant political participation. ...read more.


Direct democracy has far greater legitimacy than an elected body of officials and career politicians as they are decisions that have been decided on by those who are required to follow them. For me this is a huge benefit as citizens take direct responsibility for political decisions and can't shift the blame onto anyone else which should ensure a stable government. On the other hand it could be argued that citizens being responsible for political decisions could lead to an upsurge in unwillingness to compromise which could obviously spawn public conflict. The closer people get to an issue, the more passionate and devoted they may get. Assess the advantages of representative democracy It is a more practical form of democracy. As I have already said, direct democracy can only really work in small communities, as mass meetings to decide matters of state are nearly impossible. It is seen as the form of popular rule in large modern communities. I'm yet to find a drawback of a practical system, whatever its other flaws, so I can only conclude that it is indeed a genuine benefit. ...read more.


Personally I disagree and think that if people want to participate in politics then they can easily apply to take part in focus groups or vote in referendums and voter apathy is more a product of politicians that people can't relate to, constant un-kept manifesto promises and a lack of choice when it comes to individuals and political parties. It also helps maintain greater political stability as it separates people from the major political decisions of the time. A certain amount of public apathy is seen as useful for maintaining order because when people become more directly involved in politics they usually become more passionate which often leads to greater conflict. I would see this more as political stagnation rather than stability as I can't see how you can see public apathy in a positive light. Low voter turnout can lead to bad policy. If very few people vote, there is a very low chance that those in office will be voted out of office (political stagnation), regardless of what they do while they are in office. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    were found to actually believe that considerations of personal and organizational power are not germane to them. Nevertheless, as Hardy and Clegg (1996) noted, 'the hidden ways in which senior managers use power behind the scenes to further their position by shaping legitimacy, values technology and information are conveniently excluded from analysis.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    The annual term limit was probably there to guard against the incompetent and the corrupt (Trumbach). Cleishthenes also formulated the law on ostracism whereby those considered potential tyrannoi or threats to democracy were exiled for ten years. This further strengthened the fledgling democracy by providing it with a new weapon.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    The word "democracy" comes from the Greek word demokratia. This, in turn, was derived from two other Greek words: demos, meaning "people," and krator, meaning "rule" or "authority". The people of ancient Greece used the word demokratia to describe a government where every citizen took part in making the laws and administrating justice.

  2. Are Judges Politicians In Disguise?

    appointment; therefore William Marbury sued James Madison and challenged the Supreme Court to forceably appoint Marbury to the position. The Supreme Court decided that to forceably appoint Marbury to the position is something that the Constitution doesn't allow the Supreme Court to do.

  1. Does the mass media have a direct effect on British Politics?

    more likely to read a newspaper with a similar political outlook to themselves, so the newspaper re-inforces their political views instead of totally shaping them. This theory "claims that the media do not create or mould public opinion, but merely reflect or reinforce it" (Budge & McKay,1993:121).

  2. Does democracy bring peace?

    In his 1994 State of the Union address promoting the spread of democracy, President Clinton made three major assumptions, firstly that democracy is desired by every nation and secondly that it could easily be exported to every nation. History has shown that the desire of America for every nation to

  1. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    This is highlighted further by the speech of Alcibades, which influences the public radically.10 The lack of consideration to the oracle, in comparison to the significance of rhetoric, suggests that consulting oracles were merely part of a ritual and it has been suggested by critics that when oracles were actually

  2. Advantages of direct and representative democracy

    This is good because it gives them a chance to show the people that they are there to represent them, not just do what they themselves want.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work