• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the advantages of the 'First Past the Post' electoral system.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the advantages of the ?First Past the Post? electoral system [25] The electoral system FPtP is used in the UK?s general elections, which elect a government to run the country for 4-5 years. There is a debate over the problems with FPtP, the main argument being that it?s not representative of the population. In 2011, there was a referendum to replace FPtP with another system, AV. However, FPtP was kept. This is for a number of reasons. The first reason is that FPtP creates a powerful and decisive (and usually single-party) government, which means the government can do its job ? govern. FPtP often gives a party a majority in the House of Commons, increasing their authority and ability to carry out their manifesto. Because of the majority produced, there is very rarely a coalition government. Coalitions are considered worse than a single-party system as two parties are competing to achieve their own manifesto, and so compromises have to be made in order to run the country successfully without jeopardising their legitimacy, whereas majority governments don?t need to worry about that. ...read more.


Other systems, such as AMS and STV, rely on complex ways of calculating the winner of an election, some including formulas, such as the Droop and D?Hondt. It was shown that the public prefer the simplicity of FPtP in the 2011 referendum. Because of its simplicity, FPtP is cheaper to run ? you only need volunteers to count the votes, not to calculate. However, turnout is low in the UK ? 2001 had the lowest turnout since 1918, with only 59% of the electorate voting. That?s 41% of the public not being represented. Because of this, there?s an argument that there?s currently a participation crisis in the UK, which when political apathy is so high that election turnouts drop very low, which shows that only a select number of people are voting, and the views of the whole of the UK is not being represented in Parliament. The people who do not vote as much are those in a disadvantaged situation ? the poor, or the homeless, which is a large part of the UK?s political voice not being heard. ...read more.


Wasted votes are also an issue with this system as well. In the 2010 election, 52.8% of votes cast were for the losing candidates. That?s over half the population who made no difference to the overall outcome of the vote, and aren?t represented in the Commons by someone they support. I think that this advantage is outweighed heavily by its drawbacks, and is one of the key failing points of FPtP. When assessing voting systems, a key part of where you fall on the debate is whether you think that Parliament is in place to produce a strong government or to represent the people. It?s a compromise that has to be made, and although I feel the biggest advantage is the strong and decisive government FPtP produces ? coalitions may work well in some situations, but a single-party system work better. However, this is not enough to sway may view. I think that the advantages of the FPtP system do not outweigh the negatives. This is because it?s ridiculous that the majority of the electorates views are not represented and that smaller parties (although large) are unable to have a say in this country?s politics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Outline the problems of the First Past the Post system and consider whether the ...

    3 star(s)

    make no change because there is a constantly winning party called 'Safe seat'. In the last election, for instance, many people wanted to vote for Liberal-Democrats party, 'safe seats' and wasted votes dissuaded them to do it (Lowe et al.

  2. Distinguish between the effects of FPTP and other electoral systems in the UK

    The list system therefore reduces the number of parties in Parliament which may or may not be beneficial to the electorate. Also, with FPTP a strong relationship between MPs and constituents is in place, the electorate knows who to lobby if they want a specific issue raised in Parliament whether

  1. What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of First Past the Post?

    There is also an electoral bias of FPTP towards the Labour Party. This resulted in enormous majorities sin 1997 and in 2001. Small nationwide parties fare badly because their support is thin, and therefore even if they were to get many vote overall it is likely that the number of seats will not be increased significantly.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    and then left to their own devices, and football is the no. 1 national pastime and area of interest in this country. If the same idea was applied to government and politics, it would be almost inevitable that after a few years of implementation, the interest would once again rise.

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    Only 114 seats were estimated to be uncertainties between Labour and the Conservative's in 2001. This could contribute to an apathetic attitude amongst the electorate, as, if people don't believe that their vote counts, they won't bother voting at all, which could contribute to an even lower turnout.

  2. Electoral Systems.

    vote for a party they support and still have a limited say through an additional member. * The separation of the vote, allows the voter to make an expression of popular approval or disapproval which is not possible under First-Past-The-Post.

  1. Critically assess the extent to which there is a crisis in participation in UK ...

    It is however, reassuring to see our European counterparts experiencing similar trends in party membership decline. The dismantlement of the class system illustrates how class nowadays is more ambiguous, and therefore there is likely to be decrease in typical class voting behaviours.

  2. Assess the extent to which the 2010 election illustrated the advantages and disadvantages of ...

    FPTP system as perhaps they believed it was considerably simpler in comparison to the alternative voting system. Another advantage of FPTP that the 2010 election illustrated was the way in which it provides a clear-cut choice between the two main parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work