• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) :

Extracts from this document...


Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) : Direct Democracy is Government by the people, for the people; and allows citizens of a municipality or state to have a direct effect on both how they are governed, and the outcomes of certain issues; for example, in cases when a referendum is required. Referendums are a good example of Direct Democracy; voters can vote either 'Yes' or 'No' to express their opinions, and the majority wins. However, they rarely take place; normally only at a time of constitutional change, or when the issue is serious and based on public opinion. There hasn't been a UK wide referendum since 1975, though Scotland has had several since, for example to do with the dissolution of their Parliament. However, there are issues with this form of Democracy; as although it is direct, it is not necessarily fair, and this is the issue at hand. Referendums allow for 'tyranny of the majority' to occur, whereby the views of minority groups are insignificant, as the majority win despite issues with accurate representation in the results. ...read more.


In this particular referendum, 67.2% of voters said we should remain part of the European community; however, as the voter turn out for this referendum was only 64.5% of those eligible, only 43.3% of the population actually voted 'Yes'. This may therefore render redundant the argument that increased Direct Democracy in the UK, would allow people to have more of an opportunity to directly effect decisions normally made on their behalf. People cannot have more of an effect, if they are not turning out to vote. Other issues are to do with the suitability of the decisions made, as by increasing Direct Democracy in the UK we would need to have a more informed populace. The argument that greater use of Direct Democracy would result in a more informed citizenry, and therefore a more efficiently run country, can be called into question, mainly because these citizens may not want the responsibility of making these decisions. By electing representatives in General elections, they are trusting that these people who have the education necessary to use their vote wisely, will vote on their behalf, and in their interests. ...read more.


But whilst this may go someway towards improving the Governments public image, the problems remain that it is difficult to organise Referendums, and doing so on a regular basis will cost a lot of time and money. The Government can also make it difficult for a referendum to actually be passed, so it is arguable whether the people in reality would have more power than previously, or whether it would be an illusion to allow the Government to save face. In conclusion, I think that whilst the theory behind a greater use of Direct Democracy sounds good; 'People can make their own decisions, be more informed, take a greater role in politics' etc; putting it into practice in a fair manner would be pretty much impossible. However, the current system of an electing a representative to vote on the behalf of an area of the populace has also proven to be flawed, and so whilst not the best solution, a country run by Direct Democracy may be a better alternative to the current situation. Though of course, it would be extremely difficult and expensive to implement, and is therefore never likely to actually happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - A well structured essay that contained the key components of evaluation and argument throughout. The question was addressed.
Where the answer had weaknesses was that the concept of direct democracy was mainly referred to in quite theoretical terms - the answer would have been stronger had there been greater use of examples of direct democracy in practice.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Impact of government policies

    3 star(s)

    The National Audit Office report on reserve forces in 2006 notes that over 12,000 reservists have been deployed in Iraq since 2003 and they contribute approximately 12 per cent of the fighting force. Reservist medical recruits have been very important in the army as they have operated up to 50 per cent of the field hospitals in the conflict.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How effective is the British Constitution in protecting the rights of its citizens?

    3 star(s)

    votes, since there were a greater number of the public represented in the voting numbers. When a person votes for a particular political party they are putting forth a vote in favour of that party's ideal (unless of course tactical voting occurs, in which case this argument is flawed), they

  1. The importance of democracy

    It also guarantees that minorities have a free voice and are free from discrimination. Indeed, democracy is sometimes described as a political system where minorities rule. Of course, popular democracy can become little more than government by the majority, and early forms of democracy looked like this.

  2. To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the powers of the UK ...

    A new parliamentary committee was introduced called the Joint Committee on Human Rights; it is their job to decide if government bills were given the certification saying they are compliant with the Human Rights act.

  1. The argument that the media have an effect on political attitudes and opinions is ...

    Another reason for the dependence on the television rather than the print media for political information is the perceived bias of newspapers and the perceived neutrality of television news. It is universally acknowledged that newspapers show a certain amount of political bias, although the bias is more obvious in some

  2. Discuss the indepedence of the UK Judiciary

    Britain, in theory sticks to the idea of a separation of the judiciary from the other two branches of government. The rule of law is a legal term which means no one individual has immunity from the law. A.V. Dicey a marvellous constitutional expert, referred to the 'rule of law' as underpinning the British constitution.

  1. The election campaign is now more important than long term factors in shaping voting ...

    which is 8% of households, to stop people like Rupert Murdoch (owner of The Sun, The Times and The News Of The World) having so much of an influence on voters. Television debates also played a huge part in shaping voting behaviour in 2010 as it gave the public an insight into the personalities of party leaders.

  2. The strengths of the UK constitution outweigh the weaknesses. Do you agree?

    There has been much debate recently over whether Britain should establish its own Bill of Rights, as it currently is reluctant to write down its rights and relies on ?residual rights?. In America citizens can readily access to and are able to learn their rights should the need arise, however

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work