• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) :

Extracts from this document...


Assess the arguments in favour of the greater use of Direct Democracy in the UK (25) : Direct Democracy is Government by the people, for the people; and allows citizens of a municipality or state to have a direct effect on both how they are governed, and the outcomes of certain issues; for example, in cases when a referendum is required. Referendums are a good example of Direct Democracy; voters can vote either 'Yes' or 'No' to express their opinions, and the majority wins. However, they rarely take place; normally only at a time of constitutional change, or when the issue is serious and based on public opinion. There hasn't been a UK wide referendum since 1975, though Scotland has had several since, for example to do with the dissolution of their Parliament. However, there are issues with this form of Democracy; as although it is direct, it is not necessarily fair, and this is the issue at hand. Referendums allow for 'tyranny of the majority' to occur, whereby the views of minority groups are insignificant, as the majority win despite issues with accurate representation in the results. ...read more.


In this particular referendum, 67.2% of voters said we should remain part of the European community; however, as the voter turn out for this referendum was only 64.5% of those eligible, only 43.3% of the population actually voted 'Yes'. This may therefore render redundant the argument that increased Direct Democracy in the UK, would allow people to have more of an opportunity to directly effect decisions normally made on their behalf. People cannot have more of an effect, if they are not turning out to vote. Other issues are to do with the suitability of the decisions made, as by increasing Direct Democracy in the UK we would need to have a more informed populace. The argument that greater use of Direct Democracy would result in a more informed citizenry, and therefore a more efficiently run country, can be called into question, mainly because these citizens may not want the responsibility of making these decisions. By electing representatives in General elections, they are trusting that these people who have the education necessary to use their vote wisely, will vote on their behalf, and in their interests. ...read more.


But whilst this may go someway towards improving the Governments public image, the problems remain that it is difficult to organise Referendums, and doing so on a regular basis will cost a lot of time and money. The Government can also make it difficult for a referendum to actually be passed, so it is arguable whether the people in reality would have more power than previously, or whether it would be an illusion to allow the Government to save face. In conclusion, I think that whilst the theory behind a greater use of Direct Democracy sounds good; 'People can make their own decisions, be more informed, take a greater role in politics' etc; putting it into practice in a fair manner would be pretty much impossible. However, the current system of an electing a representative to vote on the behalf of an area of the populace has also proven to be flawed, and so whilst not the best solution, a country run by Direct Democracy may be a better alternative to the current situation. Though of course, it would be extremely difficult and expensive to implement, and is therefore never likely to actually happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - A well structured essay that contained the key components of evaluation and argument throughout. The question was addressed.
Where the answer had weaknesses was that the concept of direct democracy was mainly referred to in quite theoretical terms - the answer would have been stronger had there been greater use of examples of direct democracy in practice.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Impact of government policies

    3 star(s)

    The National Audit Office report on reserve forces in 2006 notes that over 12,000 reservists have been deployed in Iraq since 2003 and they contribute approximately 12 per cent of the fighting force. Reservist medical recruits have been very important in the army as they have operated up to 50 per cent of the field hospitals in the conflict.

  2. The importance of democracy

    It also guarantees that minorities have a free voice and are free from discrimination. Indeed, democracy is sometimes described as a political system where minorities rule. Of course, popular democracy can become little more than government by the majority, and early forms of democracy looked like this.

  1. Is Britain an elective dictatorship?

    In between elections the government is still held accountable. The scrutiny and control of the executive is carried out in Prime Minister's question time, opposition days and back bench rebellions. Also the presence of collective cabinet responsibility means the cabinet has to side with government policies and therefore the Prime Minister usually has to have agreement from his cabinet.

  2. Conservatism is more a state of mind than a political ideology

    The new right preaches economic freedom with free markets, no government interference and the acceptance of change. Faith in the neo-liberal view should be placed in the market not on the government.

  1. The argument that the media have an effect on political attitudes and opinions is ...

    newspapers than others, with the obvious example of an openly biased newspaper being the once strong pro-Conservative party line of The Sun, and now radically switching to favour Labour. It is not just the tabloids who are biased, however, for it would be difficult to argue that The Telegraph is

  2. To what extent would the wider use of referendums improve democracy in the UK

    If these decisions are made by the public most of the time then people might feel that the government is powerless, and that they are not representing them enough. In a representative democracy we put our trust into politicians so that they can make important decisions because sometimes the public

  1. From what extent does the UK suffer from a participation crisis?

    This took away the limelight of the real politics and the problems that were most important and the readers had very little information on the political stories. The people do not know what is going on so therefore cannot be well informed enough to get involved in the politics that is happening.

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    So overall we see that the HRA is unsuccessful, as it has seen many gaps that people have used to contradict its purpose. The Freedom of information act (effective from 2005): The publics right to see official documentation. This gives the power to see the documentation that the government or organizations have on themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work