Many historians are divided over the reasons for why the liberals wanted these reforms. Some historians, such as Searle argue that the liberals were just trying to gain support for the liberals through reforms. He writes “Lloyd George and Churchill’s main concern was to capture working – class support and, by doing so, to marginalize the labour party”. Other historians argue that the reforms were put ion place to gain some prestige for the party by reforming the current, embarrassing state of the governments provision for the people. This was highlighted by Lloyd Georges visit to Germany and by Churchill’s visit to New Zealand. Both of these countries were once seen as lesser than Britain, yet at this time they both had welfare states in place that were helping the people, they had very little of the poverty cited by Rowntree and booth in their studies. Although, for whatever reason, the liberals did introduce a number of reforms. They were divided into four sections, reforms for the young, elderly, sick and workers & unemployed.
It has often been said that the reforms for the children were the most important to the liberal party. In 1906 the first reform to be introduced by the new liberal government was the school meals act. This meant that schools could provide free meals for under privileged children, although at this time it wasn’t mandatory. The committee on physical deterioration noted “it is said to be the height of cruelty to subject half-starved children to the process of education. By 1910 9 million school meals a day were being provided. In 1907 a clause was added ot the ‘Education administrative provisions act’ to allow health visits to junior schools. The most important Liberal reform for children was the ‘children’s charter’. This was the consolidation of 39 previous statutes that covered a wide area of topics from negligence & cruelty to the problem of young offenders. The government was very fast to pass reforms relating to children for two reasons, they saw it as important that they keep the nation fit in case of war and an army was needed and also because these children would be future voters.
The Liberals felt that the government should give something back to the elderly after they had worked for so many years. Many committees had looked at the issue of the elderly, and concluded that old age was a main cause for poverty. In 1908, in the budget, an idea for state pensions was introduced. It was agreed that people of the age of 70 and over would receive 5 shillings a week as long as their income was below 31 pounds a year. The plan was very popular and also helped the liberals in another way as well. The liberal party were losing by-elections. Lloyd George once remarked “it is time we did something that appealed straight to the people – it will I think help to stop this electoral rot and that is most necessary”.
The reforms for workers and the unemployed were a way that the liberals could keep both the workers and the rich happy. The