• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the reasons why Britain's reactions to European co-operation changed in the period 1945-63.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the reasons why Britain's reactions to European co-operation changed in the period 1945-63 In the years after WW2 there was strong opposition in Britain toward possible European integration. Britain had not faced Nazi occupation and still retained her Empire unlike her European ' cousins'. However, by 1961, she was deeply involved in European affairs and organisations. This shift in policy was not a sudden change of thought but a gradual adherence towards European opinion. How did this change come about? Initially, Britain's main resistance to any form of integration within Europe stemmed from two concerns, firstly that it would require power to be handed over to a supra-national organisation, resulting in the loss of her prized national sovereignty. Secondly, fear that such integration had the potential to cut across her economic and political ties with its Empire. The British Empire still stretched across the world and Imperialistic attitudes still remained. At the end of WW2 many still held the view that Britain, and its Empire, could become the 'Third World Power' behind the U.S. ...read more.

Middle

At the same time as the establishment of the ECSC, European countries were also considering the establishment of an integrated, multi-national European Army responsible to a European Organisation, as first put forward under the Plevin plan in October 1950. Britain's initial reaction, exemplified by Bevin and Attlee, was to dismiss this plan, at least until the U.S. showed its full support for it and for German rearmament. Even then, constant bickering between France and Britain resulted, often about the need to make firm commitments regarding the exact deployment of troops. It was only when Germany was admitted to NATO that progress finally occurred as British worries over the creation of a supranational European organisation dissipated and the British could maintain its foot in two camps, Europe and the US. With progress occurring on many fronts (e.g. ECSC, NATO) it was not long before European countries were looking for more general economic and political integration. Such integration, provided it included Germany, would give others such as France access to the biggest and fastest growing economy. ...read more.

Conclusion

was pressurising Britain into joining. Essentially the main reason was that EEC was performing well and Britain's EFTA was performing poorly. But the application was turned down by De Gaulle who, ironically, used Britain's concerns over supranationality as an excuse for his refusal even though France, itself, preferred inter-governmental co-operation between sovereign states as a basis for the continuing operation of the EEC. The 1960's showed Britain continuing its effort to join the EEC, without success. Initially its Commonwealth links could be used by France as a reason for refusing EEC membership as these economic links might potentially undermine France's determination to maintain a highly subsidized Common Agricultural Policy. Unfortunately, Britain's reliance on US Polaris submarine capabilities, its inability to generate sufficient resources to pay for expensive military equipment (e.g. Blue Streak), or to act independently in a military capacity (e.g. Suez Crisis) but particularly its recognition that the world was passing it by as new political and economic alliances were being forged, meant that EEC membership applications had to continue even if national pride was damaged by each refusal. The Britain of the 1960's had fallen behind European countries because of its refusal to lay down old concepts and start afresh. Ian Chandler ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    French President Chirac was incensed by the political maneuvers of the letter-signers, and openly castigated them, saying that they had "missed a good opportunity to shut up."15 The Effect of the Iraq Crisis on CFSP Earlier in this paper we saw that forging a "common" foreign policy among fifteen (let alone twenty-five)

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    pillar of the Union, known as "Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)", with the goal of strengthening the European institutionalization. In Washington Summit NATO, officially comply with the ESDP policies of EU. Up to this point, the bargain between two sides of the Atlantic was rather challenging.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    On this reading, its significance must be seen at the symbolic level. For some, it could be the symbolism of accountability and democracy. But then, why so empty? There is another possibility. In its rhetoric Maastricht appropriated the deepest symbols of statehood: citizenship, defense, foreign policy -- the rhetoric of a superstate.

  2. Evaluate the view thatEuropean integration and not, extended cooperation between states, was the onlyconceivable ...

    At this time of period, "European integration was not to be achieved in one great act of political will, because the will was not there"(George & Bache 2001). In 1947, national governments were not remotely willing to surrender their national sovereignty to any extent.

  1. La mthode Monnet: What were the main driving forces behind the supranational integration of ...

    The Soviet Union became an increasingly intimidating presence in the East and what was once an enemy became a useful ally in the Cold War. Dell believes that 'the Truman Administration began to develop a key role for a strong and prosperous Germany in the confrontation of the two superpowers'4.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    The poles at this point are governing by actively searching for the common good or to reconcile individual interests. From the extremes on these two axes, four distinct governance styles can be derived as shown in table 1. Classifying typical EU governance on the organizing principle of political relations is rather easy.

  1. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    This was a delayed entry that was to cost Britain the loss of potentially significant economic gain. The consequences of Britain's decision to opt out of European unity plans were extensive; hindsight tells us this. However what the essay seeks to underpin is the events, reasons and justification behind Britain's

  2. Assess The Relative Significance Of Marshall Aid To Moves Towards European Integration Between 1945 ...

    (Urwin, 1995, p18). The OEEC was essentially an intergovernmental body, but it did have some institutional organisations, especially the Council of Ministers, which had one representative from each of the 16 member states. However, it was not "...as France for instance had wished, a supranational authority with the ability to control national economies."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work