• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Relative Significance Of Marshall Aid To Moves Towards European Integration Between 1945 and 1954.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess The Relative Significance Of Marshall Aid To Moves Towards European Integration Between 1945 and 1954. The Marshall Plan lasted for four years between 1948 and 1952, and offered $22 billion in American aid to Europe. This essay believes that Marshall Aid was significant in moves towards integration in the post war years, and will show this by looking at the Marshall Plan, the Schumann Plan and the Pleven Plan. The Marshall Plan (1947) was, effectively, a result of US self-protection, designed both to bring West Germany back into the diplomatic process and to bring together Western Europe on the side of America - as Lundestad (1998, p29) puts it, "The Soviet Union and Communism had to be contained; the western zones of Germany had to be integrated with a revitalised Western Europe in general, and with France in particular." The offer of aid was open to all countries of Europe but, as the USA must have anticipated, the USSR and its allies turned it down: nonetheless, all European countries urgently needed the aid. ...read more.

Middle

changed their minds, with some sort of economic union now appearing to be "...a political and economic necessity..." (Dedman, 2000, p43). West Germany too was willing to enter into economic union with France and Europe, since it was the only way West Germany could ever be brought back into the fold: "...stability and union within Western Europe rested ultimately upon a rapprochement between France and West Germany." (Urwin, 1995, p44). The Schumann Plan duly delivered. It proposed the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), thus linking France and West Germany economically whilst also reassuring France by pooling the two most essential resources West Germany would need should it go to war again. This was a step closer to federal union in Europe - the ECSC allowed no veto, and involved loss of sovereignty for the participants. Only 6 countries joined, though, Britain being the most notable of those who did not take part: nonetheless, the ECSC consolidated the vital Franco-German relationship - according to Henig (2002, p25) ...read more.

Conclusion

The collapse of the most far-reaching plan, in integration terms, led to setbacks - "An alternative to the EDC had to be found." (Urwin, 1995, p69), and the USA went back to its original plan of rearming West Germany through NATO. The Pleven Plan was thus significant in demonstrating that the countries of Europe were not yet ready for high level integration. In conclusion, all three of the Marshall Plan, the Schumann Plan and the Pleven Plan were significant, in some way, to European integration in the period 1945 to 1954. The Pleven Plan was significant in that it showed that integration in terms of high politics was a little too much for Europe at the time; the Schumann Plan was arguably the most significant of the three, since it paved the way for the creation of the European Economic Community a few years later; but the Marshall Plan was nearly as significant, since it united the whole of Western Europe and demonstrated that integration was the best way forward in the post war years. Thus Marshall Aid was quite significant to moves towards European integration between 1945 and 1954. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. 'Economic Integration within the European Union: Have MNEs driven the Commission's decision to adopt ...

    Attention is now turned to the internal level. Globalisation of the world's economy has lead to increased interconnections and integrations between countries and firms alike (Flower and Ebbers, 2002). Flower and Ebbers (2002) believe that "MNEs are the principal actors in the globalization of the world economy...The principal problems faced

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    The collapse of Berlin Wall caused such a radical change that in this transformation period, Germany needed American support in dealing with Soviets and French support in dealing with the rest of the Europe. The United States solution for the big Germany was NATO: in other words continuation of the Cold War hegemony, with Germany as their special partner.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    Indeed, Community was a fine word to capture that value. Now the operational rhetoric is Union, not Community. We have come full circle. The deep irony is that the full circle has come on the ideological level alone. In the way it related to individuals, supranationalism was about the diminution of nationality as a referent for transnational intercourse.

  2. Evaluate the view thatEuropean integration and not, extended cooperation between states, was the onlyconceivable ...

    communist states installed: the American feared of spreading communism in parts of Europe. The Marshal Plan, therefore, offered financial and food aid to Europe to assist mainly its economic recovery, and the offer of the aid was under certain conditions requiring joint action of European states.

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    The European Union has now welcomed a further ten countries in eastern and southern Europe: all of them have signed the Accession Treaty in Athens on 16 April 2003. The countries are Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia.

  2. EU army

    The only way of achieving this dream of being a political superpower is establishing a European Common Army. This army should be trained as a rapid reaction force and must consist of the best soldiers of all member states. A minimum number must be decided for each country proportional to the country's population and the number of trained soldiers.

  1. La mthode Monnet: What were the main driving forces behind the supranational integration of ...

    So despite being a key player in Europe at the time, Britain was not a driving force for supranational integration. The United States of America had very different motives for European integration to those of the European states. In the difficult years after World War Two Europe divided and two global superpowers emerged.

  2. C1 Analyse the factor, which contribute towards an effective team.

    * Incentives- targets, rewards for co-operation, and rewards for teams as whole As we carried out the business our reward was the profit. Our team leaders encouraged members to sell the tickets. The managers told the members that if we aren't selling tickets we might not get any profit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work