• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Relative Significance Of Marshall Aid To Moves Towards European Integration Between 1945 and 1954.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess The Relative Significance Of Marshall Aid To Moves Towards European Integration Between 1945 and 1954. The Marshall Plan lasted for four years between 1948 and 1952, and offered $22 billion in American aid to Europe. This essay believes that Marshall Aid was significant in moves towards integration in the post war years, and will show this by looking at the Marshall Plan, the Schumann Plan and the Pleven Plan. The Marshall Plan (1947) was, effectively, a result of US self-protection, designed both to bring West Germany back into the diplomatic process and to bring together Western Europe on the side of America - as Lundestad (1998, p29) puts it, "The Soviet Union and Communism had to be contained; the western zones of Germany had to be integrated with a revitalised Western Europe in general, and with France in particular." The offer of aid was open to all countries of Europe but, as the USA must have anticipated, the USSR and its allies turned it down: nonetheless, all European countries urgently needed the aid. ...read more.

Middle

changed their minds, with some sort of economic union now appearing to be "...a political and economic necessity..." (Dedman, 2000, p43). West Germany too was willing to enter into economic union with France and Europe, since it was the only way West Germany could ever be brought back into the fold: "...stability and union within Western Europe rested ultimately upon a rapprochement between France and West Germany." (Urwin, 1995, p44). The Schumann Plan duly delivered. It proposed the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), thus linking France and West Germany economically whilst also reassuring France by pooling the two most essential resources West Germany would need should it go to war again. This was a step closer to federal union in Europe - the ECSC allowed no veto, and involved loss of sovereignty for the participants. Only 6 countries joined, though, Britain being the most notable of those who did not take part: nonetheless, the ECSC consolidated the vital Franco-German relationship - according to Henig (2002, p25) ...read more.

Conclusion

The collapse of the most far-reaching plan, in integration terms, led to setbacks - "An alternative to the EDC had to be found." (Urwin, 1995, p69), and the USA went back to its original plan of rearming West Germany through NATO. The Pleven Plan was thus significant in demonstrating that the countries of Europe were not yet ready for high level integration. In conclusion, all three of the Marshall Plan, the Schumann Plan and the Pleven Plan were significant, in some way, to European integration in the period 1945 to 1954. The Pleven Plan was significant in that it showed that integration in terms of high politics was a little too much for Europe at the time; the Schumann Plan was arguably the most significant of the three, since it paved the way for the creation of the European Economic Community a few years later; but the Marshall Plan was nearly as significant, since it united the whole of Western Europe and demonstrated that integration was the best way forward in the post war years. Thus Marshall Aid was quite significant to moves towards European integration between 1945 and 1954. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. 'Economic Integration within the European Union: Have MNEs driven the Commission's decision to adopt ...

    By developing and integrating Europe's exchanges, Euronext has been able to generate synergies by incorporating each individual exchange's strengths and assets (Anon, Unknown, a).

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    The Soviet type socialism, on the other hand, was promoted to be in conflict with the interest of the Western sphere, i.e. areas of economic and political influence, free flow of capital, goods and so on. In a short span of time, both superpowers combined their global political objectives with their military capabilities, i.e.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    One has to believe that the High Contracting Parties understood the fundamental nature of citizenship in redefining the nature of the Union -- and it is this understanding, rather than misunderstanding which lead them to the desultory Article 8. But why, then, open Pandora's box at all?

  2. Evaluate the view thatEuropean integration and not, extended cooperation between states, was the onlyconceivable ...

    communist states installed: the American feared of spreading communism in parts of Europe. The Marshal Plan, therefore, offered financial and food aid to Europe to assist mainly its economic recovery, and the offer of the aid was under certain conditions requiring joint action of European states.

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    Interest and inflation rates are much lower. You buy, sell and borrow within a larger and more competitive market. Managing your business is easier and less expensive. Disadvantages of the EU and the Euro We can say that EU is united although has at the moment 15 countries with different

  2. EU army

    The establishment of the common army is a three-stepped process and all these steps must be taken by each member state for the reunification of military forces. The first step is to ensure that an atmosphere of European patriotism prevails in the country.

  1. C1 Analyse the factor, which contribute towards an effective team.

    As our team didn't work effectively we failed to recognise our roles and duties. As the days went by there was no one to motivate the members and the team leaders lost their motivation. The members didn't really know what they were doing, as the managers didn't carry out any meetings or communicate with each other's.

  2. La mthode Monnet: What were the main driving forces behind the supranational integration of ...

    was thought that a closer union with Europe might threaten this position. Britain supported the idea of rapprochement between France and Germany, but disliked the High Authority aspect of the ECSC. Politically, being involved in European integration simply was not of immediate importance to the British government at the time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work