• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess The Success Of Attempts To Develop Comparative Theories Of Revolutions.

Extracts from this document...


Assess The Success Of Attempts To Develop Comparative Theories Of Revolutions The social revolutions that have occurred spasmodically throughout history are an important area of study, forming a distinct and drastic pattern of sociological change.. Unique to social revolutions is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur together in a mutually reinforcing pattern, and it can be asserted with a fair degree of accuracy that changes occur through socio-political conflicts in which class struggles do play a role. In studying revolutions, the use of theory has been employed in an attempt to provide an explanation (within a context) that enables us to predict for the future which consequences should follow which events. Theories over the causes, course and consequences of revolution have developed significantly; early theories becoming limited in their aims and objectives. Instead, today comparative historical methods are a major influence on theoretical interpretation of revolution that gives breadth from the use of examples. The main difficulty encountered by historians in attempting to generalise revolutions using the theoretical approach has been the failure to test and modify explanations in light of subsequent historical cases. ...read more.


Wolfenstein's theory, which sought to explain revolution in terms of personality have also failed as it is not possible to apply clinical methods to past political leaders and it appears only valuable to look at the role of leader in a wider social context. Having said this, Gurr's ideas of relative deprivation do help in understanding a major aspect of revolution in giving a greater insight into what gives rise to discontent. Systems/Value Consensus theories explain revolutions as violent responses of ideological movements to severe disequilibrium in social systems. Chalmers Johnson's Revolutionary Change theory sees revolution as 'the purposive implementation of a strategy of violence in order to effect a change in social structure' that will change core-value orientations, which have become out of balance between the state and its institutions and the people. A successful revolution will accomplish the resynchronisation of a social system's values and environment that the old regime was unable to accomplish. The other most significant approach to revolutions comes in political conflict theories the most important of these being Charles Tilly's From mobilization to Revolution. This theory puts the conflict between government and opposing groups at the centre of it explanation of collective violence and revolution. ...read more.


The old regimes also had a number of broad similarities, in that all three revolutions occurred in wealthy and politically ambitious agrarian states. In revolution, all three cases saw the conjuncture of the incapacitation of the established central, widespread rebellion by the lower classes (particularly the peasantry), and attempts by mass-mobilising political leaderships to consolidate a revolutionary state. This again highlights the possibility for there to be consistent factors across revolutions - a large presumption that theories of revolution make. In light of this, and whilst paying significant attention to the key differences that also occur, it can be seen that, 'the similar socio-political features of the French, Russian and Chinese revolutions can be highlighted and explained in ways that would purposefully be missed by analysts determined to keep them in separate type categories'1. It is therefore clear that whilst general theoretical explanations of revolution can adapt to the many and varied forms necessary, they lack the applicability of grounded, specific case studies. It is a catch-22, in that neither can effectively be achieved without neglecting the other, but these theories have played a large part in sociological history, and this certainly, should not be ignored. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    'In terms of late medieval political theory his ideas were revolutionary, for they challenged the theological assumptions which underlay the traditional medieval doctrine of the supremacy of the Church over the State.'3 'The cultural consensus of Europe based on universal participation in the Body of Christ was broken, never to be restored.

  2. Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our ...

    Finally, it is in contrast to Frank's dependency theory and internalist. The factors that determine whether or not a country can develop are internally generated within any one society. So if countries so not develop in the manner described, it is because of problems with themselves and, of course, nothing to do with the world system.

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    actions would bring about the greatest happiness, then you could measure pleasure. The quantity of pleasure can be measured according to Bentham using the Hedonic Calculus. It does not matter if an action goes against the law, at least the result will be maximum pleasure.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    To call them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call them to give up a condition that requires illusions'. Karl Marx, a political scientist, came up with the idea of the so-called perfect society, where everybody shared everything they had: money, property, jewels, and e.t.c.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Pointless because as long as there was more for others in the common store, one was not infringing on another's natural rights. Irrelevant because property production or the use of labor was completely individualistic and one should not be able to control another's labor as it is an infringement on their natural rights.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    concentration of capital bring in their train an ever more detailed subdivision of labor, an ever greater improvement of old machines, and a constant application of new machine - a process which goes on uninterruptedly, with feverish haste, and upon an ever more gigantic scale.

  1. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    of the characteristics of the "I" or "me" and the perceptions of the relationships of the "I" or "me" to others and to various aspects of life, together with the values attached to these perceptions. (Rogers, 1959, p.200) This gestalt is a fluid and changing process, available to awareness.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    parties and to identify the party that best represents their own orientation, as well as the presence of four parties that have competed in all three election cycles, suggests change has taken place in the party system as the parties have gained experience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work