• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that most power in modern western societies is held by people who have not been democratically elected.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that most power in modern western societies is held by people who have not been democratically elected. It is believed that people who have not been democratically elected hold most power in western societys, however how true is this? Throughout history people have been born into positions of power, if your father was a lord, you would most likely also be a lord. Marxists believe that this division of power still exist in modern society today. Unlike Functionalists who believe in a fair merocratic society, Marxists believe that the social class you are born in is where you'll most likely end up staying. However this theory is critised for being far to deterministic as many people from the working classes are able to make there way up the social ladder. Marxists believe that everything designed in society is there to favour the bourgeois, from the State to the legal system. Althusser believes that economic determinism needs to be rejected. According to Althusser, societies comprise of 3 levels: The economic, the political and the ideological. Although the economy is 'determinant' in the last instance', the political and ideological levels are not mere reflections of the economy but have 'relative autonomy' and don't have effects on the economy. Stephen Lukes identified three ways in which sociologists have approached the study of power. Each involves studying a different dimension or 'face' of power. He argues that an understanding of power requires an awareness of all three faces. ...read more.

Middle

Robert Dahl conducted a study of local government in New Haven and found that no-one group is seen to actually dominate the decision-making; power is therefore shared among a range of groups. The idea is rejected by pluralists that democracy is possible in a one-party state, since there must be opposition parties and a range of pressure groups to represent the views of those who disagree with the governing party. Pluralists claim to have solid evidence for their view of the distribution of power from case studies of decision-making on a local level (Dahl) and at a national level (Hewitt) There have been many criticisms of pluralism, first of all it is believed that measuring power by examining decisions ignores non-decision making. It also ignores the fact that that people may accept and even welcome decisions which are against their interests and its is shown that some groups exercise more power than others and so is an unequal representation of interests and many interests may not be represented at all. Marxists also argue that the pluralists' focus on the decisions taken by local and national governments ignores the possibility that the real centre of power is elsewhere. As a result of the criticisms of pluralism many classical pluralism supporters modified or changed their positions. Robert Dahl has accepted that the unequal distribution of wealth and income in the USA makes equal political influence impossible. ...read more.

Conclusion

He identified 3 key institutions as the centres of power, The Federal government, the major corporations and the military. Mills believed that these 3 elites are closely related because of their similar origins, education and kinship and because there interests are in twined. Critics of Mills argue that he only showed that the elites in the USA have potential for control, he failed to show that they had actual hold control. In addition pluralist disagree with this theory and argue that there are many other elites such as pressure group leaders, religious, trade unions and so on, who can provide a counterbalance to these more powerful elites. Marxists also reject the notion of a power elite, arguing that real power in capitalist societies derives not from positions in institutions but from ownership and control of the means of production. In conclusion it seems as though there are many different approaches to the view on power in society, whether the people are in power because they were democratically elected or whether there, there because they were born into it. However many of the views tend to ignore the problems with black people and women. Why are there only 25% of women in parliament and why are there only 6 black MP's? Although functionalist believe we live in a fair merocratic society it's becoming fairly obvious that we don't. Though many views have may have some truth behind them it extremely hard say that one person's opinion of power in society is wrong. It really depends if you believe in the power of the people or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    But, for whom is the good produced?" For oneself; egoism? For everyone else's benefit but oneself; altruism? For everyone's benefit, one's own benefit being calculated equally among all other recipients; universalism? Different answers to these questions produce radically different obligations.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    Almost all of the laws which will contribute to maximum utility will be allowed by the harm principle. The laws which might contribute to utility, but are not allowed by the harm principle, could only be passed if a government allowed exceptions to the harm principle.

  1. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    Due to the competition of groups it means each must look to win votes, thus it means that groups will not follow their own interest but seek to follow interests that will be popular for the public. To summarise " inter group competition...

  2. Describe Jean Baudrillard's concept of the orders of simulacra in relation to design in ...

    These forced increases in demand and therefore production are evident in the contemporary world market. Important to the development of Capitalism is the use of money which abstracts labour and commodity values to a common unit for the purpose of trade.

  1. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    Another common criticism of pluralist theory is that groups are dominated by small elites or oligarchies. Disagreeing with Truman's main ideas, that interest groups serve to protect the interests of their members, many observers argue that private associations often aim to enhance the well being of their officials rather than the majority.

  2. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    These are all necessary but not sufficient for a pluralist account of political power as without all of them being there, then it is impossible for the states political power to be pluralist. It is these necessary conditions that are central to the major differences between pluralist and ruling elite theories.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Prior to the collapse of the Soviet regime, parly development, limited though it was, reflected demand-side politics. Since these new parties were allowed no official standing, they developed as grassroots organizations, offering electoral support to candidates who supported their reform agendas, an offer that was eagerly accepted by many candidates.

  2. Examine the history of and different types of Anarchism

    Kropotkin argued that species survived by working together. He claimed that competitive capitalism threatened the further evolution of the human species. Individualist anarchism Individualist anarchists believe that the sovereignty of the individual is impossible in a society ruled by law and government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work